Kermit_70

Many thanks! Is it also possible to hide it completely and call it back with a keyboard stroke?

Hello, just one quick question or suggestion for potential future feature: is it possible to work with a minimal version of the GUI on the screen? I mean just the SpeechAssistant/Clear/SayIt/PTT/? section. Personally I prefer to use the GPS, weather radar, radios, transponder on my aircraft virtual cockpit, and keep P2A only for realistic ATC communication. Would then be possible to maintain P2A as a small window on top of Full Windowed FSX? Even better if I could make it appear/disappear with the click of a button (maybe through FSUIPC?). Is that currently possible? Thanks!

OK, i didn't know that FSUIPC could "read" the traffic conditions, as I only use it to program my switches and controls. Does anybody here know which AI Traffic add ons can report traffic status to FSUIPC? I think this would be good information for Dave, to put in a future manual or Q&A page in support of his product. Thanks!

That sounds fantastic, Dave. Thanks. Will that work with any third-party add on injecting AI traffic in FSX? For example, I am currently using UT2. It would be great to hear back reports from users who actually see all this in action.

Hi there, congrats again for the amazing speed this product is taking shape. I can't wait for final release. Could the developer please elaborate and explain a bit what is the "AI Traffic awareness" built in release v2.0.0.26? Does it mean that now runway assignments and takeoff/landing clearances take into account the movements of existing (not controlled by P2A) AI traffic? That would be a great thing! Thanks

Hi Mike, I posed very similar questions in my post "Pilot2ATC & other add ons", and was suggesting the developer to have potential customer vote for most desirable new feature. Please take a look and leave a message if you think it might be a good idea. My impression is that right now P2A is mainly aimed to carefully planned IFR missions (airliners?), The fact that it currently ignores simulated AI traffic and simulated weather (it does work with real weather, yes!) is a bit disappointing. Potentially a great product, though.... cheers

Thank you for your clear and quick reply, Dave. I know that building a truly complete ATC add on for FSX is a big task, but I also recognize it is a commercial opportunity. Personally I am Certainly willing to pay for an addon that simulates the real-life reason of ATC: keeping me separated from traffic, both on the ground and in the skies, and in doing so coordinate approaches and landings according to both traffic and weather. An ATC service that is blind to both weather and traffic sounds a bit "light"... Please don't take this as a hard criticism, as I understand P2A does take in consideration real weather, and this is indeed a good starting point. I am just wondering how important are to potential customers simulated weather and traffic, that is what is actually going on in the simulator. I would like to offer a simple suggestion: would it be too difficult to set up a sort a electronic board on your website, where potential customers vote on possible improvements to put in your to-do list? This would take away most of the guess work on your side about what should be on top or bottom of your priorities. You might be surprised to see that a lot of us are not necessarily flying airliners in long and standard IFR routes, but maybe enjoying shorter VFR routes in Ga aircrafts, where ATC is equally important and enjoyable. You could require that people sign up to some news mailing list, before being able to vote on the list that you set up. So they would already become "potential customer". Trello might an easy platform for that, but anything would do, really. Looking forward to seeing the new improvements during beta, and wish you the best luck with this very promising product! Cheers

Hello, I have been looking for a complete ATC product for my FSX setup, and I am really impressed about this product, and I am trying to understand more its features before purchasing it. I read the manual of version 2 (beta), which covered most of my questions. I read threads here, but I still have a couple of unresolved questions. Basically it all comes back to the way Pilot2ATC is set to interact with other add ons: Weather (I use ASN or REX Architect) and AI traffic (I use UT2). (1) AI traffic I understand that P2ATC does not inject or control AI, but I think it is aware of it. What I don't understand is to which extend ATC takes in consideration AI in the sim: (a) is the active runway used by P2ATC the same used by AI in the sim? (b ) does P2ATC make me taxi/hold according to AI on the ground? ( c)) does P2ATC provide adequate separation with AI traffic in flight? (2) Weather I understand that P2ATC gets its live weather conditions online, BUT reads ATIS from the sim. Is it still true? The obvious problem is when flying with simulated weather (e.g. ASN historical or REX Weather Architect), which will generate a mismatch in ATIS and runway assignments. I know there is an option to override runway assignment in P2ATC, but it is not very elegant. Has this been fixed? Overall I have to give "two thumbs up" to the developer. Really a nice piece of work so far! Any sense of when the beta will finish? Thanks

Hi Randall, thank you for your comment, it helps. So you think it is not too basic/easy? I am already familiar with basic concepts of IFR procedures, but I was looking for an enjoyable way to practice them to become proficient. I am not a real pilot, but I like to be challenged. Thank you

hi there, did anybody try the newly released FS Academy On Instrument for FSX? http://www.fsvisions.nl/released-fs-academy-on-instruments/ I would like to have a honest review or at least opinion. I am using FSX boxed with tons of ORBX, REX and A2A GA Aircrafts. Cheers

Thank you GaryGB, much more clear now. Cheers

I still don't understand. It is really confusing, and clearly hard to explain. When you say "after FS has been re-started, the NewScenery.cfg file will over-write..." seems to suggest that it is not read yet as actual scenery.cfg? But that us exactly what I want, that my newly modified scenery becomes active now. Let's try again. Let's say I use the Scenery Editor to modify scenery list before I run FSX (so FSX is off); then I save the modified version as NewScenery.cfg (as suggested). Now I launch FSX, will it immediately read the NewScenery.cfg file or still the old scenery.cfg? Also, will the NewScenery.cfg be renamed and overwritten to old scenery.cfg at this time? I cannot think of posing the question in a clearer way, I hope the answer will finally clarify this... many thanks! And of course this sounds like black magic to me... What is FSX doing different when reads a NewScenery.cfg that would not do if reading a simple Scenery.cfg? This could help clarify the utility of this rather mysterious "convention"...

So, just to be clear, if before running FSX I use SCE to tick off unwanted scenery, then SCE will save it as NewScenery.cfg, when I start FSX this will use my new NewScenery.cfg instead of the original scenery.cfg? When will the NewScenery.cfg be renamed as Scenery.cfg, then? My question sounds a bit silly, I know, but I am confused. Thanks I will give you an example: I have FTX England and PNW, but also "third party" London VFR. If I want to flight in PNW I will select "North America" in FTX Central (which will deactivate FTX England), but Will also want to deactivate London VFR. I could do that through SCE. In this all process I would like the groups I made in SCE (for example of all my "third party" airports in UK) to be conserved as a structure, even though ticked off in SCE. Makes sense? Thanks!

Sorry guys, one more question on this topic. Maybe it has been answered, already, but I could not find it... I understand there are issues with FTX Central erasing SCE groups. I also understand it is strongly suggested not to mess up with ORBX sceneries via SCE. Ok, agreed. Now, the question: Can I do the following without being sorry: 1) Use FTX Central to select (activate) ORBX region. 2) Close FTX Central 3) Use SCE to untick all "third party sceneries" (to use ORBX language) that I won't use. Especially if previously "grouped" in SCE (e.g. London VFR, etc) 4) Save new as scenery.cfg 5) Close SCE. Launch FSX Comments? Previous experience? many thanks

Many thanks to all of you for very detailed replies! VoxATC is now officially in my wishlist. Cheers!

Hi Jay, thank you so much for your long and very detailed answer, very much appreciated. It all sounds quite exciting, but I am a bit disappointed by what you are saying about "being locked in VFR", even when transition from VMC to IMC. In real life this is an issue of much concern for safety, as VMC-to-IMC is the greatest cause of fatal accidents in GA. It is actually possible (and advisable) to file a IFR plan even if you departed VFR. It is unofficially called pop-up IFR, especially if you are already on VFR flight following. here is an article about it: http://www.avweb.com/news/system/183174-1.html I even heard people departing under VFR (weather permitting) and filing IFR in air, just to avoid long queues on the ground for IFR clearance (this becomes very much a reality in bigger, congested airports, as airliners must always get IFR clearances.). So I guess one follow-up question for you is: do you know of any way-around this with VOXAtc? I mean besides landing at an alternate a filing a new IFR plan from ground. Maybe some way to pause VOXAtc, and restarting it under IFR but starting right away with vectors from the point where you are to the next fix of your plan? Also, can you declare emergencies in VoxATC? I fly A2A aircrafts, where sometimes something fails... It would be cool to get on the com, declare emergency, and getting cleared to the closest avilable strip keeping all traffic out of the way. On another note, have you ever tried VATSIM/IVAO or even Pilot Edge? Would you care to comment on the different win experience between those and VOXAtc? Many thanks, again. Giovanni

Hi Jay, I am in the same situation as BreTT, meaning "considering purchasing this product". I have been thinking about this for a while, but I think I need a bit of a push. I flight exclusively small GA, mostly VFR cross-country, but sometimes IFR (VMC into IMC scenarios). Even when in VMC sometimes I shoot IFR approaches, just for fun. Until now my ATC is (very poorly) handled by default FSX. I also run UT2 for AI traffic (with GA at 100%). In these conditions, would you say VOXATC is going to add much, or would it be an overkill? I like the idea of voice-recognition, but I will probably never fly full SID/STARS or other complex IFR procedures. Just VFR following and IFR published approach procedures. But I would enjoy requesting a runway change, or taxi clearances in towered airports, or being told to hold until a AI lands, or calling a "go around" and being vectored to a hold. Your typical ATC activity for small GAs. Is it worth it? What is the best feature of VOXATC that you personally enjoy when flying GA? many thanks!

What do you mean by "too much 'slop' between the shaft and the 'bearings'"? Do you you see space around the shaft, if you look at the unit front? That could mean the front bearing is not properly fixed in its slot. When you closed it the last time, did you make sure the 3 bearings (two in the back and now in the front) properly fit in their slots on the case? I had a similar problem last night, and had to take it apart again to put the front bearing in its slot. Now it is fine.

So I guess the rubber bands or lighter springs did not make it "smoother" but just "lighter"? Thanks

Guys, can I ask you the exact specs of the NEW springs you put in? None of my "local hardware stores" seem to have anything that could work, and I have to get them online. Could you please share the exact sizes you used? I am sure this would be helpful for lots of people... Thanks!

Hello all, following forum's advice I recently got a CH Yoke to substitute my previous Saitek. Although I feel the Saitek looked much better, I have to agree that overall CH provides smoother movements, due to its different internal design. I am reading in forums ll over the place that people have been experimenting with modifications on CH yoke to make it less hard to push/pull, at the expenses of even less centering force (elastic bands instead of metal springs). My questions for you expert simmers or real pilots: 1) is it desirable to have self-cantering yoke in flight sim, or does it get in the way with realism? 2) how does the yoke in a real GA plane (C172, Cherokee, etc) feel like in terms of self-cantering? 3) if you have tried the above mod, could you comment on your experience between original springs and elastic bands in CH yoke? many thanks!!

Dear all, I am reporting back after few days of experimenting and tweaking, taking advices from you. I am now settled on settings I am happy with. Given my hardware (listed in my first post in this thread), I finally settled for: FSX.cfg (only relevant entries) Affinity Mask = 84 (core 1,2,3 in use, not 0 and not HT cores) Texture_max_load=2048 Texture_bandwidth_mult=80 Fiber_frame_time_fraction=0.2 no Bufferpools entry (leave to default) Nvidia Inspector (only relevant entries) Antialiasing - settings (FSAA): 4xMS Antialiasing - transparency (TSAA): 2xSGSS Nvidia predefined FXAA usage: allowed Toggle FXAA: on Anisotropic filtering mode: application controlled Anisotropic filtering setting: off (linear) Frame Rate limiter: 30 (unlimited in FSX/settings) Maximum pre-rendered frames: 3 Vertical sync Tear control: standard Vertical sync: 1/2 refresh rate As a result, running REX4, ASN, ORBX FTX Full Regions, UT2, I get no visible shimmering, no noticeable stuttering, and FPS fluctuating between 20 and 30. Overall, I am really pleased with this. Many thanks to all for the great help! Please let me know if you have questions on my settings. I would be happy to help others. Cheers

I am doing some research... and it looks like my real bottleneck might be the PSU (FSP300-60HCN)... According to what I see, I could get in nothing more than a GTX 730, without changing the PSU as well... Would that be worth it, compared to the current GTX 650?

Many thanks, Jim. I am honoured you took the time to help me out... What a great community! Cheers!

I will have to start saving, then... or find a new job! Cheers is version 2.0.0 (24/11/2013) still the latest? Thanks