snapshot21

I hope that developer's name starts with FS and ends with Labs. Afterall, they were the ones who first implemented full integration with GSX in P3D if i recall correctly.

In defense of heatblur, it was out of their control, the F4E was ready by that time. But ED always packages new releases with patches for the main sim and other products. The showstopper that prevented the release was on one of those and not with the F4E. So it was ED who pretty much took all the flak with the delay, similar to what PMDG experienced. I think its just the nature of the flightsim community.

No, I think PMDG's RSR deserves that title. -RR (not a burner account)

A2A is the best msfs dev that could make this. They own the actual plane and were able to get the flight test data they needed to develop it. Right before it had its belly up landing 😞

She looks like she's going 300 miles per hour just sitting there!

Last couple of updates for the PMDG 737 line have been bug fixes for the UFT/EFB.

- PT-6 Engine simulation - Flightmodel, specifically how floaty it is.

It probably went the way of the dodo. Sorry ill show myself the way out now.

I would not get my hopes up for the fenix Block 2. Dev said October is still the target but not a hard deadline and it will change if they decide it is still not at the quality they want. Just manage expectations and it will be a pleasant surprise when they do deliver 😄

Love the changes with the 1.1 update. The takeoff roll feels much better using the recommended takeoff trim settings. A couple of issues noticed during first flight though: - Why is the NG rising during climb to cruise level? NG should remain constant due to the PT-6 being an NG Governed engine. - Pressing the TOGA button still does not give a TO pitch guidance.

Also regarding the takeoff trim setting. Setting the rudder trim to the recommended takeoff range made for a very sketchy takeoff roll. The flightmodel seems to not have enough yaw tendency to the left when on takeoff power.

First flight so far, great plane but it really needs an improvement in the PT6 Simulation. 1. Taxi Range is unusable, it needs too much throttle to break away and start rolling forward. Even Taxi range should be enough to taxi as that is the purpose. 2. Noticed not much TRQ decrease during climb to cruise level. Im really glad to finally have an analog TBM so I hope the PT6 simulation gets improved and it will then be the perfect plane 😄

What in the.... I thought I woke up in a parallel universe where McDonnell-Douglas merged with Airbus instead of Boeing.

No need to worry, the Majestic Q400 is one of the best planes in P3D in terms of Performance (FPS)