Heres my bit of input:1. I say PMDG Should NOT produce a Boeing 777, They already have a MD-11 and a 747 which are both long haul/wide body heavies. And for those who own the collection, would want something a bit differentWilco Publishing/feelThere already has a 777, Its pretty decent Its the best 777 out there with operatable fuctions that are pretty well simulated, however Im sure if PMDG created a 777, it would be better simulated than Wilcos most likely. But Since its already done, why re-do it?2. I strongly agree and say YES to PMDG Creating something, NO COMPANY has done before. But it would be a well-known aircraft thats still in use today. As others said they should produce a Boeing-717. Its a great aircraft, I know the interioris a bit like the MD-11, they way the panels are set up. Now there was some small group I believe made a crappy freeware one, with GPS Navigation and it was just awful. So they dont even count. But we would love to see a Boeing-717 from PMDG. Im sure it will create a lot of profit as well. Because there is a somewhat high demand for it, as no one has created it, I think it would be a huge blowout. With the past products PMDG has offered to us, and the detailed manuals, aircrafts a 717 will be a hit.Who Agrees?

Heres my bit of input:1. I say PMDG Should NOT produce a Boeing 777, They already have a MD-11 and a 747 which are both long haul/wide body heavies. And for those who own the collection, would want something a bit differentWilco Publishing/feelThere already has a 777, Its pretty decent Its the best 777 out there with operatable fuctions that are pretty well simulated, however Im sure if PMDG created a 777, it would be better simulated than Wilcos most likely. But Since its already done, why re-do it?2. I strongly agree and say YES to PMDG Creating something, NO COMPANY has done before. But it would be a well-known aircraft thats still in use today. As others said they should produce a Boeing-717. Its a great aircraft, I know the interioris a bit like the MD-11, they way the panels are set up. Now there was some small group I believe made a crappy freeware one, with GPS Navigation and it was just awful. So they dont even count. But we would love to see a Boeing-717 from PMDG. Im sure it will create a lot of profit as well. Because there is a somewhat high demand for it, as no one has created it, I think it would be a huge blowout. With the past products PMDG has offered to us, and the detailed manuals, aircrafts a 717 will be a hit.Who Agrees?

I would definitely vote for a 717! There is an older payware out there that comes with a package of liveries and missions/adventures to fly. I don't have it. I can't really identify it as crappy, but it doesn't appear to be the quality of PMDG. I think it was Perfect Flight or something like that. It's the only payware 717 I am aware of. Keith

I voted and hope for a 777; most ideas here besides the Airbus idea are not realistic as it doesn't make economical sense to produce a sim airliner which isn't distributed in large numbers over the whole world.Only Boeing, Airbus, Bombardier and Embraer Jets are realistic. As we have two very good 757s and 767s on the market and the new Embraer E-Jet Series now too i would say A & B are realistic choices.But Airbus is covered already by 2 companies, Wilco and IFDG. Perhaps not PMDG standard, but i think good enought for most sim flights, esspecially for all the ones who fly online where only "normal" flights without major problems are simulated.PMDG now covered the 744, MD11 and soon will cover (speaking for FSX) the 737.The only aircraft missing is the 777, the Wilco one isn't really deeply simulated, much lower than their E-Series and Airbus series planes...And if you guys choose to work on a 777 after the 737NGX i hope you consider making all the models available:77A, 772, 772ER & LR, 773 and 773ERI don't know much about the specific systems, but i hope/think they are similar and just the look, MTWO, range and other "data" differ. Correct me if i am wrong...

I voted and hope for a 777; most ideas here besides the Airbus idea are not realistic as it doesn't make economical sense to produce a sim airliner which isn't distributed in large numbers over the whole world.

SSTSIM concorde ????I bet they wish they had your insight :( Mark

Only Boeing, Airbus, Bombardier and Embraer Jets are realistic. As we have two very good 757s and 767s on the market and the new Embraer E-Jet Series now too i would say A & B are realistic choices.

I would agree with a push for Embraer Jets. There's the ERJ-145 PIC, and the Level D 767, but please assist me to identify the very good 757 for FSX. There are multiple posts here that identify the Captain Sim and Just Flight products as problematic with problematic to no customer support. For now I'll let my vote be whatever value it may be and keep hoping for quality regional aircraft for short routes. Have a great day! :( Keith

One might find my answer old fashioned and/or narrow minded:Boeing 747-400 with revised system logic.That simple it is,delcom

If you havent checked out the new FBW vid from Airsimmer, you should check it out, it really is the business.I have been following that forum, for a long, long time and I can tell you that they are really close to releasing this product.That is why I voted for the 777, because firstly it is a wonderful aircraft, and if it is going to be at the quality of the MD-11 and 747, then in the long run it could be a an even bigger seller than the 747, secondly there is no good 777 out there. :( I have proof from the team (I wrote to them) and only the things in the January Update is what is left, you never knw this could be a April, May release.Here is the update if you haven't seen it:http://www.airsimmer.com/support/index.php...t=0&start=0 and the FBW video:http://www.airsimmer.com/snap/fbw_demo_1.wmvRegardsAlexei BUtterwick :( :(

Heres my bit of input:1. I say PMDG Should NOT produce a Boeing 777, They already have a MD-11 and a 747 which are both long haul/wide body heavies. And for those who own the collection, would want something a bit differentWilco Publishing/feelThere already has a 777, Its pretty decent Its the best 777 out there with operatable fuctions that are pretty well simulated, however Im sure if PMDG created a 777, it would be better simulated than Wilcos most likely. But Since its already done, why re-do it?[/size]

I don't agree with you on that, I have the WIlco/FeelThere 777-200. And its a real dissapoinment.The FMC is utter garbage - you CANNOT add neither SIDS or STARS to your plan, its frustrating.It just doesnt appeal to pro simmers, you can only use the most basic buttons on the overhead. The night lightning is horrible.Exterior model is pretty decent actually, and it got cool details on the landing gear. And it maneuvers qiute well.To bad it's a load of trash (ya, there I said it) :(- Philip

If you'd going to do a regional jet I would think that the CRJ series appeals to the wide audience with the most real world operators and routes. It would be nice to have a PMDG quality level regional jet so that I don

Count me in among those who would love to see PMDG do a 777. The Wilco 777 has severe bugs in the FMC, and they have not shown any interest in even continuing to support the product. A realistic 777 from PMDG would be awesome on so many levels. This is one of the major holes in my fleet, aside from a realistic 737NG. If PMDG did a 777, I would buy it without hesitation...and I'm unemployed at the moment. :(I wouldn't mind seeing PMDG do a 717, Dash-8, or BAe 146 (or Avro RJ) as well.

MY Vote is for 777 because there are no decent simulations aroundOk is another mid long aircraft but PMDG is launching 737 NGX V2 for short mid range, so this is the situation for me:747 PMDG is perfect 767 LEVELD is perfect757will be released by LEVELD in a short time and if it was valid as the 767 there would be no need for meAirbus situation is quite good The planes from Wilco are not so bad a part some switch not simulated and few bugs that were finally corrected380 simulation ? I think it's an airplane too recent and complex at the time to reproduce, the same is true for 787It would be nice a reproduction of Learjet aircraftsBut i wish to fly a PMDG 777

Wilco Publishing/feelThere already has a 777, Its pretty decent Its the best 777 out there with operatable fuctions that are pretty well simulated

Well.. you can't be serious? :( The Wilco T7 is utter bs. PSS version is much better but still a LOOOOONG way from being a good enough product for the serious flight simmer. We crave a little better realism and quality.So a 777 from the hands of PMDG is something over half of the voting pilots in her want,and probably something 99% in here would purchase and fly anyway. Plus... all those other pilots not really bothered to have an account here. I'm sure that group is 10 times larger than those with an account here. So, a 777 is really in demand! Please make one.Apart from the lack of a really good 777,something I miss is a really good Gulfstream! THAT...would be a treat to the flightsim community! :(

Well, not alot of interest in a A380. this really suprises me. How great would it be to fly this one. Certainly PMDG would do it right with all the advances in technology for the 380...So there ya go..A380.Capn OzPeter Osborn

But would not an BAc 146 be much more interesting than a CRJ?:D

While I do like the BAE-146 and think it is an interesting aircraft I

While I do like the BAE-146 and think it is an interesting aircraft I