Couldn't help but notice that the shot of the -900 doesn't have that extra pair of emergency exit doors? I'd hate to speculate but does this mean that only the -900 was modeled, or that both the -900 and the -900ER were both modeled? Well i guess i'll have to wait and see.

Oh man I hope that it isn't just the old and obsolete -900 series. That would be an almost worthless varient. But like you said, we will just have to wait and see. But I will also keep my fingers crossed for the 900ER in the package.

TURKISH AIRLINES TC-JFV please !!! :)Turkish Airlines B737-800 Fleet: 52 ------- Orders: 25Turkish Airlines B737-900 Fleet: ----------- Orders: 20

@PMDG,I would love to see Ryanair and Caribbean Airlines if that is ready to be shown :)

TURKISH AIRLINES TC-JFV please !!! :)Turkish Airlines B737-800 Fleet: 52 ------- Orders: 25Turkish Airlines B737-900 Fleet: ----------- Orders: 20

+1!! :D

Dear PMDG,To be honest, KLM looks pretty good!! However I like it to fly in a little little bit dirty planes, but you've said several times that we can choose between dirty or clean exterior and dirty or clean cockpit. Really looking forward to some dirty liveries, new (dirty) cockpit shots, the coming video and ofcourse ... the release!

Ill take a Manchester United livery for sure!Number 19!!

And please don't forget about American Airlines' AstroJet...

we can choose between ... dirty or clean cockpit.

When did they say this? I seem to remember them saying that the dirty cockpit was the only one.

I'm holding out for a look alike for the Navy P-8A Poseidon.

I'm holding out for a look alike for the Navy P-8A Poseidon.

Wow, that's quite a bit of vortex generators.

Wow, that's quite a bit of vortex generators.

Are you referring to the PIGS ears? Ray

Are you referring to the PIGS ears? Ray

No, the many on top of the fuselage... Unless those are no Vortex Generators? What i meant was that there are many compared to the 1-3 typically found at the top of the pax varient.

When did they say this? I seem to remember them saying that the dirty cockpit was the only one.

That is what I recall. But I could easily have missed a post stated otherwise. Regardless of that fact, if PMDG has or is thinking about implementing this, I am all for it. A good work space is a clean workspace, and I would very much like the option to fly in a flight deck that isn't covered in total filth.

And please don't forget about American Airlines' AstroJet...

+1. For sure that is a must have.Michael Cubine

Wow, that's quite a bit of vortex generators.

Vortex Generators?Look like aerials to me.They've taken that long to release the 737NGX that both the Virgin Blue (which is now Virgin Australia) and the Qantas livery are out of date.

Wow, that's quite a bit of vortex generators.

Those are various aerials and many of the fuselage protrusions, bumps etc are sensors. Remember the P-8A is a maritime recon/anti-submarine aircraft. Boeing's idea with the P-8A is to replace the Lockheed P-3C Orion/Aurora/Arcturus, depending on the country - Aurora/Arcturus is Canada's variant of the P-3C, the CP-140 turboprop recon aircraft (modelled after the Lockheed L-188 Electra.A cool looking airplane though, different from the venerable NG we all are used to seeing - with the raked wingtips. Interesting thing is those big portholes on either side of the fuselage, those are observation windows where a spotter would be seated there and they identify ships and whatnot as they fly up and down the coast or out to sea. Cheers,