I have their Citation II but was looking at their CX version 2.0But before I buy would like some opinions both good and bad regarding this product from those who've had it awhile and have flown it a good bit.What say y'all? :smile:Ummm... the title should read HEAR not HERE... :(

It's very good, particularly in the systems and VNAV areas. Textures aren't incredibly detailed, but the performance is very good. It's one of the best business jets available for FSX.

I have quite a few hours in the Eaglesoft Citation X 2.0. it's one of my favorite planes to fly. The systems and FMS are very detailed, exterior modeling and paint are fantastic. I do most of my flying in dusk or night conditions and I really appreciate the excellent night lighting in the VC cockpit. It's one of the best FSX purchases I've made.Chris

My opinion: like all ES aircraft, it has:- (+)Great systems representationGreat Flight modelPretty good frames(-)Definately not masters of texturing in the VC.... VC looks dated and well below par against other contemporaries. Contains some 3D but still looks very flat. Cheers.

Definately not masters of texturing in the VC.... VC looks dated and well below par against other contemporaries. Contains some 3D but still looks very flat.

I like es planes but I do have to agree 100% with the above statement.Especially the " well below par" part.

Im looking into this jet and it may be my next buy! Corp jets are my weakness and i try to find as many as possible for fsx.

I bought it in December and it is pretty much the only thing I have been flying since. I have the PMDG MD11 and the F1CS MD80, the CX v2 system wise and texture wise is on par with these. If you have anything like the MD11 or MD80 keep in mind that all aircraft operate differently so there will be differences, for starter the FMS operation.As far as the VC, it looks great to me.

(+)Great systems representationGreat Flight modelPretty good frames(-)Definately not masters of texturing in the VC.... VC looks dated and well below par against other contemporaries. Contains some 3D but still looks very flat.

I own it and agree. Navdata updateable through Navigraph is a huge plus for me as well.Note: You need a registered ver of FSUIPC to get the functioning fadec. Without it you manually engine thrust.

What they said. :)I thought the VC was gonna be a bigger deal than it was. The plane is fun to fly, systems are modeled well and after about 5 minutes you forget that the VC could be a little more detailed. Good purchase.

My main concern is system and flight model fidelity. I like 3D and VC cockpits, but they are below systems and flight model on my lists of must have things.

I like the CX very much. It is my main airplane and I have no gripes at all. The flatness of the VC does not bother me as I use a modified 2D panel 99% of the time.

Thanks for all the input!

Systems good, exterior model very good, interior very bad. Personally I don't care how good the systems and FDE are if I feel like I'm looking at a painted cardboard panel and cockpit - visuals are too important to me in terms of immersion. I wouldn't buy it today and no longer have it installed.