This looks too good to be true! The best I have seen in a sim. Probably not to be released this year, EFHK is their first big airport and they work on details like crazy. Please support this amazing team by spreading the word and do yourself a favor, if it's not already done: buy their other sceneries.

 

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.557779357591798.1073741837.464622066907528&type=1

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.547427308627003.1073741836.464622066907528&type=3

 

This is quite possibly the most detailed scenery model ever, with 99.9% of everything modeled exactly, and I mean *exactly* as it appears in real life. Now, that's no small feat to accomplish, but given that we, the designers, are for the first time taken aback by our own work (gasp) -- you can expect us to be making flightsim history here.. We prefer to start on home soil for simplicity, but once we cross the pond, the sky's the limit...

 

 

Pascal

Ooooh, those buildings look amazing. Hope they can do some 3d grass as well; some of those ground textures look very 2d.

Ooooh, those buildings look amazing. Hope they can do some 3d grass as well; some of those ground textures look very 2d.

Keep in mind this is early WIP, the ground in EFTP is excellent, and here it's evident they didn't even start to work on it.

OMG, the level of detail amazing! 

 

Everything looks so real and the reflection of the trees on one of the glass buildings is just beautiful. 

 

This really shows the capabilities of XPX and the future possibilities.Or should I say, what the future holds for XPX!

 

Outstanding work indeed!!

This does look very impressive. 

 

It does beggar the question tho'  In a flight simulator, what is the need for that level of detail? 

 

I am not singling out this developer, every FS developer is doing this these days Orbx etc...  But how much does it actually improve the sim experience?  You don't notice it and 500 feet agl.

 

To me a stable 30 FPS is more important than knowing the road signs are correct.

 

 

To me a stable 30 FPS is more important than knowing the road signs are correct.

 

 

I totally agree with you,  I too prefer a stable/fluid simulation experience rather than all the eye_candy with 22fps. But unlike you and I, there's people that are willing to except low fps as long as the eye_candy is there.

 

Of course if we can have both, then by all means bring it!

To me a stable 30 FPS is more important than knowing the road signs are correct.

 

I totally agree with you,  I too prefer a stable/fluid simulation experience rather than all the eye_candy with 22fps. But unlike you and I, there's people that are willing to except low fps as long as the eye_candy is there.

 

+1.

 

That's (one of the various reasons) why I'm using XP since over 6 years :yahoo:.

 

 

Of course if we can have both, then by all means bring it!

 

True :good:.

This scenery is something else, I can't wait to see it done and out.

That looks really good.

Looks good but why only Sweden?  Developer of this talent could make more money building airport for USA.  Just a thought.

 

 

Looks good but why only Sweden?

Finland my friend.

I think they are based in Finland, so it's probably easy to get high detail photos of the airfields, and IIRC, they are doing the sceneries for some commercial companies, i.e. flight schools etc...

 

Either way, they certainly do amazing work, for their chosen subjects.

This does look very impressive.

 

It does beggar the question tho' In a flight simulator, what is the need for that level of detail?

 

I am not singling out this developer, every FS developer is doing this these days Orbx etc... But how much does it actually improve the sim experience? You don't notice it and 500 feet agl.

 

To me a stable 30 FPS is more important than knowing the road signs are correct.

Hey, agree with 100% there. The big picture is important seems some miss that point.

Finland my friend.

I stand corrected!  Btw, how's the FPS for these sceneries?  Having been burned with FSX-looking-real-good-unflyable sceneries, I don't want to make the same mistake in XPX.

If they manage to optimise it well, FPS will be no problem. XP and FSX are entirely different rendering-wise.