Potential Prepar3d V3 Clue in FSUIPC Log 4.942 Release

[WarpD]

But those things happen even with a P3d 2.5 hotfix.

Which is still the responsibility of the developer(s), not L-M. The developer(s) chose to step outside the 'sandbox' that L-M provides... there's a cost and it's not L-M's responsibility.

 

As a developer, if I choose to step outside the sandbox... I take full responsibility for the consequences. As it should be.

[mgh]

It was ever thus - Because FSX code was static for years some developers chose to hook into it. etc. P3D is being now under development those hooks are no longer reliable.  Simply check those developers who have to change their add-ons when P3D changes.

[Poppet]

Happy Saturday to everyone  :smile:

[JLuis]

[DutchAir]

so this is how a thread dies!

[Skywolf]

Thank You everyone, for making this thread into one epic thread.  It time to say good bye to this thread (since I created it).  Rob - Can you lock this thread.  It has truly run its course....

 

Or

 

We just keep it alive till P3Dv3 gets released

 

Cheers,

[GSalden]

Last I checked, neither P3D nor FSX uses a lot of VRAM to begin with. So I dont see how thats applicable. Alot of folks have 3-4 GB cards and I doubt even a GPU intensive 64 bit P3D could make them bottleneck.

With my 3 monitor setup I can make my graphics card use up to 4.6 Gb...

Lucky me with a Titan X ( 12 Gb )

[WarpD]

With my 3 monitor setup I can make my graphics card use up to 4.6 Gb...

Lucky me with a Titan X ( 12 Gb )

Now, now... we've been told that's just not possible.

[ferangel2000]

Nice to heard that....

regards from Costa Rica.