July 19, 20169 yr I just started flying my C 172 this week after many months of only flying commercial passenger jets. I have the Mindstar 530 GPS, and tried programming flight plans into it and many of the waypoints to even appear. So I purchased a years subscription of Real Nav Data thinking that maybe the database is too old, and same exact issue is the result, which makes this GPS totally useless for flying with Pro ATC or any other flight plan generators. I see others have posted the same issue on the Mindstar forum. Now my question is, does anyone know of a better GPS that will work in the C 172 and be able to use common waypoints in the flight planning?
July 19, 20169 yr Bob, Flight1 has the GTN650 or GTN750 that work with the A2A C172 Fly safe Francisco Blas Windows 11 Pro | X-Plane 12 | ASUS Hero Z790 | Intel i9-13900K | G.SKILL 64GB DDR5 | ASUS STRIX 4090 | WD 4TB SN850X NVMe | ASUS Ryujin II AIO 360mm | Corsair AX1600i | Lian Li 011D EVO | DELL Alienware 38 G-SYNC
July 19, 20169 yr I have the GTN750 from Flight 1, It works great. A2A supports it well - you dont have to edit any config file or anything. You can download the GTN 750 trainer (Free) from Garmin and try it out. thx
July 19, 20169 yr Bob, Flight1 has the GTN650 or GTN750 that work with the A2A C172 Fly safe Yup, no question. GTN650 or GTN750 (preferred). Jon Skiffington
July 19, 20169 yr Author Here is an example of what I am going through with the 430/530 GPS. These waypoints will not even come up, with the latest Nav Data 1607. Is anyone able to pull up even one of these in the GTN650. I hate to spend another $70 and be in the same position I am now. On the other hand, maybe these GPS units just don't do waypoints, because i have no problem with it finding airports. and VORs. TEMPO BAPPY ENSOR NELLO HANKO CALCO KAZER
July 19, 20169 yr I am currently at work but I will look into I this evening unless someone else can verify it for you first. Fly safe Francisco Blas Windows 11 Pro | X-Plane 12 | ASUS Hero Z790 | Intel i9-13900K | G.SKILL 64GB DDR5 | ASUS STRIX 4090 | WD 4TB SN850X NVMe | ASUS Ryujin II AIO 360mm | Corsair AX1600i | Lian Li 011D EVO | DELL Alienware 38 G-SYNC
July 19, 20169 yr Hello Bob, I just ran all of your waypoints through the GTN750 and they are ALL there! Go for it!! Russ Master Sergeant, U.S. Air Force, Retired Former T-33A Crew Chief Former B-1B Crew Chief / Flightline Maintenance Expediter Former Learjet Corp. Quality Inspector Formerly Young (😩)
July 19, 20169 yr Here is an example of what I am going through with the 430/530 GPS. These waypoints will not even come up, with the latest Nav Data 1607. Is anyone able to pull up even one of these in the GTN650. I hate to spend another $70 and be in the same position I am now. TEMPO BAPPY ENSOR NELLO HANKO CALCO KAZER Why dont you try it for yourself, download the Garmin Trainer Lite from Flight1 (which is also required if you purchase the GTN650 or 750): http://www.flight1.com/link.asp?id=gtn its about 1.8gb Trevor
July 19, 20169 yr Author Last question, 650 or 750. I have read the info on Flight 1 website, but can't figure out which to get.
July 19, 20169 yr I went for the 750 and i'm very happy with it. Here is some food for thought, A great little piece from TJ If you like big moving map displays and magenta lines, get the 750. If you are an old school pilot who prefers to use the primary flight and nav instruments, get the 650, it is much less obtrusive. A GTN 750 in a 1960s Cherokee is like putting a modern automobile gps, backup camera, bluetooth/wifi interface in a 1960s car Not only does it spoil the look of the vintage VC, but if you are into realism, it would be very unlikely to see a brand new $25K USD piece of avionics in a 50 year old airplane worth about $30K-40K USD Even the 650 is pushing it but at least it is smaller and much less obtrusive. Yes it requires a few more clicks to get the same info, but at 110kts you have plenty of time to press buttons. I have both, and find the 650 perfect for typical GA cockpits. The 750 is ideal for extreme high performance aircraft like the Turbine Duke, in which things happen very quickly and you need info promptly, but for a much slower 182, Cherokee, 172, the 650 is plenty. Another point in favor of the 650, being the smaller unit, it will likely see more addon compatibility because it will require less panel redesign from the developers. Tandem/Single seat aircraft with fighter type cockpits will likely only have room for the 650 as well. CheersTJ
July 20, 20169 yr Author I went for the 750 and i'm very happy with it. Here is some food for thought, A great little piece from TJ Thanks, that is exactly the info I was looking for. The 650 will be it, you can't get much older school than me...... :wink:
July 20, 20169 yr Last question, 650 or 750. I have read the info on Flight 1 website, but can't figure out which to get. With the 650, the display is sort of small when compared to the 750. Keep in mind that both Flight1 units work in the VC of a number of aircraft by default and if you go to the official Flight1 forum for the GTN units, there is a thread that describes how to install the units into almost any VC. The only problem with the GTNs is that the user can't constantly update the Navaid database and one has to wait until Garmin has issued an update to the GTN trainer app. The most recent Navaids version is AIRAC Cycle 1513 and Flight1 has not yet updated this by default.
July 20, 20169 yr Just for clarification, Jay, let me get this right as this thread has intrigued me as I have several A2A aircraft. I have a Navigraph subscription so are you saying that if I opted for either of these GTNs from Flight 1 I would not be able to use the AIRAC cycles from Navigraph? Rick Almeida
July 20, 20169 yr Author Just watched the video on the Flight 1 site on the 750. Wow, that looks pretty cool... Might change my mind.
Create an account or sign in to comment