August 16, 20205 yr 6 hours ago, ckyliu said: Do note he is capturing with OBS and then transcoding to YouTube that is known to introduce stutters. He did also say in the comments that he noticed litte difference from 16 GB RAM in the alpha to the 32 GB he now has with the beta, and that clouds don't really seem to make much difference to framerate. Although I do agree that we should focus less on numbers and more on feel, I don't think you can really do that until you have it sat i front of you. Pretty sure Squirrel mentioned the stutters with OBS. I agree with the 100% GPU utilisation - absolutely how it should be these days, no good having CPU on 100% with your GPU on 80% for instance. New PC Ryzen 9850X3D - 32gb ddr5 6000Mhz - MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk wifi - Gigabyte wind force gaming OC 5090 - 2TB Sabrent NVMe. Old PC - Ryzen 5900x - 32gb 3600Mhz RAM - Asus Strix X570-F Motherboard - ASUS TUF OC RTX 3090 - 1TB Sabrent NVMe. AOC AGON 32" 144Hz - Honeycomb Yoke - Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog. T Flight Rudder Pedals - Trackir.
August 16, 20205 yr Resources are there to be exploted. Like RAM, this sim uses it at all, only a few hundres of MB are left to avoid paging (using HDD/SSD like more RAM, but a lot slower). But there you will need room for any kind of addons to breath. You will need more RAM for a future demanding scenery or more VRAM for a future Orbx textures... At least nowadays, apps can optimize resources by loading unloading unused textures and stuff like that to run fine.
August 16, 20205 yr 12 minutes ago, Sethos said: Heh, remember all the threads in the P3D forums where people were frustrated because their cards and hardware wasn't being maxed out, sitting at 50-60% Now it's finally being maxed out, then that's a point of worry too. I remember not long ago users complaining about VRAM issues in P3Dv5 DX12, but the good news is you can splash out on a new GPU soon 1500-2000+ Raymond Fry.
August 16, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, martin-w said: Works in FSX you say. Got any reviews of that, in FSX? Yes it works in FSX and P3D some addons ex the717 had flasings, i run P3D for more then 1 year 2x1080TI. XP11 not work in SLI , when run both P3D and XP11 i put one single 2080TI i have 2 2080TI one in my web pc and sim pc, have 2 1080TI in a drawer that do nothing. Edited August 16, 20205 yr by westman http://
August 16, 20205 yr 23 minutes ago, westman said: Yes it works in FSX and P3D some addons ex the717 had flasings, i run P3D for more then 1 year 2x1080TI. XP11 not work in SLI , when run both P3D and XP11 i put one single 2080TI i have 2 2080TI one in my web pc and sim pc, have 2 1080TI in a drawer that do nothing. My post is in reference only to Nvlink which only runs on 2080 cards, Titan cards, and Quadro cards. 1080’s would have been in sli configuration and would have been relying on the software developer to enable specific support for sli, or hacks that allow for it. the young man in the video was using two 2080ti cards in Nvlink. I have no reason at all to believe that Asobo will support sli in the new sim. I spoke to one youtube fellow who was running two 1080ti in sli, and he stated that the second card did not activate, so I wouldn’t believe the final release would be any different. Nvlink is a completely different animal altogether. Edited August 16, 20205 yr by FrankR409 I9-13900kf - rtx4090 32gb ddr5 4800mhz, 2TB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD internet - 300+ mbs / Honycomb Alpha yoke / Saitek Throttle Dell 43” 4K
August 16, 20205 yr I'm not a computer guru, but why would you not want your gpu to run at its max? Isn't that pretty normal in most games these days? I know my 1080ti runs 99% in most games i play. Isn't thats what producing the graphics and such we see, kinda makes sense.
August 16, 20205 yr CPU threads are heavier than GPU ones. The new XBOX Series X can do 12 teraflops with it's AMD Ryzen. Regards bs AMD RYZEN 9 5900X 12 CORE CPU - ZOTAC RTX 3060Ti GPU - NZXT H510i ELITE CASE - EVO M.2 970 500GB DRIVE - 32GB XTREEM 4000 MEM - XPG GOLD 80+ 650 WATT PS - NZXT 280 HYBRID COOLER
August 16, 20205 yr 43 minutes ago, FrankR409 said: My post is in reference only to Nvlink which only runs on 2080 cards, Titan cards, and Quadro cards. 1080’s would have been in sli configuration and would have been relying on the software developer to enable specific support for sli, or hacks that allow for it. the young man in the video was using two 2080ti cards in Nvlink. I have no reason at all to believe that Asobo will support sli in the new sim. I spoke to one youtube fellow who was running two 1080ti in sli, and he stated that the second card did not activate, so I wouldn’t believe the final release would be any different. Nvlink is a completely different animal altogether. probaly SLI (NVLINK) is broken as in the Asabo The Crew2. I have run a lot bench with 2080TI now how it works here is my best timespy score https://www.3dmark.com/spy/7015803 http://
August 16, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, FrankR409 said: Yes..check out youtube for one. I will open a thread on my results Tuesday or Wednesday on my dual 2080ti setup as well. Thanks.
August 16, 20205 yr 6 minutes ago, westman said: probaly SLI (NVLINK) is broken as in the Asabo The Crew2. I have run a lot bench with 2080TI now how it works here is my best timespy score https://www.3dmark.com/spy/7015803 I would love to see the setup of the 1% that had a better result than yours! I9-13900kf - rtx4090 32gb ddr5 4800mhz, 2TB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD internet - 300+ mbs / Honycomb Alpha yoke / Saitek Throttle Dell 43” 4K
August 16, 20205 yr 9 hours ago, EmaRacing said: *Laughs in jerry-rigged 120mm Noctuas on my 1070 Yep, de-shrouding and sticking a pair of Noctua's on your card can make temps and noise plumett. Will definately do the same if required.
August 16, 20205 yr 10 hours ago, atlflyer said: I noticed on some videos that the GPUs are running at near full speed. I have never played a game where it ran further than 50-60% power. 99% seems like a stress test! I usually play at adaptive half refresh 30 FPS so I can enjoy a smooth experience and not tax the GPU hard. I know my machine could run it faster but to the expense of burning out the card? Any video game not being bottle necked by the CPU or running with a frame rate limit will run at 99% GPU load, always. Lian Li 011 Air Mini | AMD 9800X3D | Asus ROG STRIX B650E-F | Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 280mm RGB | 2x32GB G.Skill DDR5-6000 | ASUS TUF RTX 5090 | Seasonic Prime Platinum 1000W | Pimax Crystal Light
August 27, 20205 yr RE MSFS2020: My GPU (RXT2070) is at 100% and my CPU (i7-8700 @ 4.2Ghz) is a 50% Seeing 30 FPS on Medium graphic setting, dropping to 20 in heavy scenery areas. What should I upgrade to get better FPS? A faster CPU (i7-10k) A faster GPU (2080 ti)? Of course 'both' would be best, but just wondering where I should expect to see most bang for my buck on FPS. Thanks Edited August 27, 20205 yr by robs113
August 27, 20205 yr Didn't read all replys but 99 percent GPU use is fine. Would you really want new software to come out that only uses a bit of the card? Not me. I would rather it use the full potential. As long as it is stable (I have had my issues already). There are other AAA games that use 99 percent as well. This is future proofing. In 2-5 years there will be new cards to be had.
August 27, 20205 yr Why buy an expensive CPU and GPU when you only use them at 50% performance. Just buy a cheaper CPU and GPU.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.