3 hours ago, regis9 said:

If you build a flight plan in Simbrief and import it into both MSFS and the CRJ you should have matching plans without having to manually enter it.  

Except the Simbrief nav data, CRJ nav data, and MSFS nav data are not the same, so some navaids may not be correct in all locations.

Anyone has an idea why do I get delta P (differential pressure warning)? I use SPEED climb and last few thousands feet using VS 1500fpm, but still have problem with this warning! Thanks in advance! 

4 minutes ago, marsman2020 said:

Except the Simbrief nav data, CRJ nav data, and MSFS nav data are not the same, so some navaids may not be correct in all locations.

I don't subscribe to Navigraph, I just buy one month ( I subscribe and then cancel it before the next month renewal)  That way it costs about $10. With that I am good easily for a year, since this data does not change that often anway, Then you can install that data in your aircrafts that Navigraph supports, as well as the sim, EFB if you use it,  and Simbrief etc.... Almost never have an issue.

7 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

Anyone has an idea why do I get delta P (differential pressure warning)? I use SPEED climb and last few thousands feet using VS 1500fpm, but still have problem with this warning! Thanks in advance! 

Did you set the landing elevation of the airport at pre-flight.

Just now, Lenny777 said:

Did you set the landing elevation of the airport at pre-flight.

No!

5 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

No!

Cabin rate also set to zero.

3 hours ago, Farlis said:

Most definately not.

It clearly uses what was already programmed for the older versions and was then translated using the new programming tools. What is probably completely new is the flightmodel.

But the avionics modelling is likely to be 95% a portover translation.

Same with the model. 

What I’m getting at was that it was touted by Mathijs Kok for example as being “all new code”. 

But yes, with bugs carrying over from sim to sim for years now, it is clearly a rehash once again. 

1 minute ago, Lenny777 said:

Cabin rate also set to zero.

OK so I change landing elevation to 300ft and it fixed delta P. But the question is how to set it correctly? Airport elevation +1000 ft?

3 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

OK so I change landing elevation to 300ft and it fixed delta P. But the question is how to set it correctly? Airport elevation +1000 ft?

Destination airport elevation exactly.

9 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

OK so I change landing elevation to 300ft and it fixed delta P. But the question is how to set it correctly? Airport elevation +1000 ft?

Whatever the elevation to your airport is your landing at.

37 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

I don't declare emergencies, but but there is a key that brings up all the hotkeys that are working in the frequency you are tuned to. So you just look up the one that you want like, 4 for emergency ( just making that up cuase I never use it) and you have declared an emergency. I use FSUIPC to assign the keypresses I use all the time to my joystick. I never use VR, tried it twice and hated it. 

Yeah without VR it is a lot easier. I actually tried to assign hotkeys and I can kind of see it working but it is ALOT if you want to actually use all of the functions. Sure if you basically just use 0 to advance through the atc and don't change anything it is easy. Also there is another HUGE drawback. No navigraph implementation at all. So ATC never assigns you any approaches. While the default ATC is a bit wonky from an UI perspective that works perfect. ATC assigns me an approach and I can ask for a different one or accept it. 

The biggest flaw is that you have to ask for vectors and no unable function, but with those flaws the other atc options are not much better and really expensive too.

11 minutes ago, JRBarrett said:

Destination airport elevation exactly.

OK, I got that now I got cabin altitude warning LOL!

I remember there was an issue of pressurization with the P3D version that not advancing the throttles to TOGA  would not initialize the pressurization system properly.  Did anyone know if this was fixed?

8 minutes ago, kakihara123 said:

Yeah without VR it is a lot easier. I actually tried to assign hotkeys and I can kind of see it working but it is ALOT if you want to actually use all of the functions. Sure if you basically just use 0 to advance through the atc and don't change anything it is easy. Also there is another HUGE drawback. No navigraph implementation at all. So ATC never assigns you any approaches. While the default ATC is a bit wonky from an UI perspective that works perfect. ATC assigns me an approach and I can ask for a different one or accept it. 

The biggest flaw is that you have to ask for vectors and no unable function, but with those flaws the other atc options are not much better and really expensive too.

Well I agree, PF3 will not tell you to climb 10,000 feet when you are 5 miles from the final approach Fix.  You don't have to ask for vectors in PF3, you are given them, unless you selected that you are flying a Star. I got my PPL in one of the most congested airspaces in the world, South Florida, Miami area. PF3 to me, is the closest thing to real ATC that I have been able to find in a sim program. 

46 minutes ago, marsman2020 said:

Except the Simbrief nav data, CRJ nav data, and MSFS nav data are not the same, so some navaids may not be correct in all locations.

I use navigraph to solve that issue.