Aerosoft CRJ released

[omarsmak30 4,068]

7 minutes ago, fogboundturtle said:

it's an MSFS issue. It has nothing to do with the CRJ. I am with aerosoft on this one.

Is this the famous performance issue that came with SU3?

[OzWhitey 3,353]

 

26 minutes ago, sidfadc said:

Haha what a noob

Wobby would be happy if he was here, this is what you get for calling it MSFS2020 etc

😉

[LouP 116]

Personally, I think it's nuts to introduce a complex aircraft into MSFS at this time.  The thing is a moving target at this point.  Every update seems to be changing the rules on 3rd party developers.

LouP

[Chock 17,769]

12 minutes ago, omarsmak30 said:

man Aerosoft support at its best 

https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/160569-performance-issues/page/3/&tab=comments#comment-1024997

There is memory problem and Hans locked the thread 😄. Anyway, has anybody noticed this issue that I posted Aerosoft thread?

Well at least they didn't downvote everyone who wasn't praising everything to the skies and lock it after one page like they normally do. 🤣

In fairness, I tend to agree with what they were saying on that particular thread, I too wish some flight simmers would stop obsessing about watching their FPS count and just get on with flying their toy aeroplane. But Aerosoft and the people who always kiss @ss on their forum still need to be a bit more professional on their support and stop downvoting everyone who doesn't say that Aerosoft is the best thing since sliced bread.

I wouldn't even bother posting on their forum personally, and I actually like Aerosoft generally speaking and think their products are great and don't easily get offended either, but that place is like going to a sycophants anonymous meeting.

Edited March 17, 2021 by Chock

[omarsmak30 4,068]

6 minutes ago, Chock said:

Well at least they didn't downvote everyone who wasn't praising everything to the skies and lock it after one page like they normally do. 🤣

In fairness, I tend to agree with what they were saying on that particular thread, I too wish some flight simmers would stop obsessing about watching their FPS count and just get on with flying their toy aeroplane. But Aerosoft still need to be a bit more professional on their support forum and stop downvoting everyone who doesn't say that Aerosoft is the best thing since sliced bread.

It is fine but at least when I posted, there is clearly a problem which I have no idea if it is the sim or the CRJ. If he said, look we can revisit this issue again after Asobo fix their mess with the performance, I will be like yeah that makes sense since really is hard to know, is a sim issue or  crj issue. But closing it like that, "oh I am tired of this so I am closing it", this is really like unprofessional, is not like a charity work or donation, people paid for that. 

[fogboundturtle 2,708]

1 minute ago, omarsmak30 said:

It is fine but at least when I posted, there is clearly a problem which I have no idea if it is the sim or the CRJ. If he said, look we can revisit this issue again after Asobo fix their mess with the performance, I will be like yeah that makes sense since really is hard to know, is a sim issue or  crj issue. But closing it like that, "oh I am tired of this so I am closing it", this is really like unprofessional, is not like a charity work or donation, people paid for that. 

I agree with you on that point. Maybe not the best communication method was used. 

[Nyxx 6,993]

Wow what a reply.

The problems with MSFS after update 3 are clear to see even 80% of the vote here showed it but AS....sums them up perfectly

Yer FPS droping to 5-17 is completely irrelevant!!!....breath taking as always.

Edited March 17, 2021 by Nyxx

[haskell 298]

1 minute ago, Nyxx said:

Wow what a reply.

The problems with MSFS after update 3 are clear to see even 80% of the vote here showed it but AS....sums them up perfectly

Yer FPS droping into away from 5-17 is completely irrelevant!!!....breath taking as always.

In fairness, that was on PAGE 3 of people moaning about FPS. *I* had actually had enough of it. LOL

[Nyxx 6,993]

Just now, haskell said:

In fairness, that was on PAGE 3 of people moaning about FPS. *I* had actually had enough of it. LOL

You must know there is a problem with MSFS at the monent AS say they have not seen it there and all is fine......yer. The arrogance is breath taking and always has been.

[flyinion 280]

44 minutes ago, omarsmak30 said:

man Aerosoft support at its best 

https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/160569-performance-issues/&do=findComment&comment=1025001

There is memory problem and Hans locked the thread 😄. Anyway, has anybody noticed this issue that I posted Aerosoft thread?

I've been having FPS issues as well today and not sure why.  Was perfectly fine yesterday, today massive drop.  Both days I've just been playing on the ground with the systems, haven't been able to set my yoke up yet to actually get a flight in (tonight for sure).  Yesterday I was running in the high 30's with the APU running.  Now I'm 29-32 for no reason, 47 before starting any power.  So weird.

[flyinion 280]

dup post delete pls.

Edited March 17, 2021 by flyinion

[Ricardo41 5,954]

Folks never learn. A leopard cannot change its spots. 

[JRBarrett 3,078]

55 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

Yes I started from C&D. Initially I picked FL400 but CRJ couldn't maintain level flight so asked ATC to descent to FL350. I tried emerg decompression to drop cabin pressure, manually decrease pressurization rate but neither thing helped

Yes, FL400 or 410 is a bit problematical unless the aircraft is lightly loaded. I’ll try doing the same to see if I can trigger the fault. In any case, best practice is to set landing elevation either before takeoff, or before reaching cruise altitude. 

[sd_flyer 6,045]

Just now, JRBarrett said:

Yes, FL400 or 410 is a bit problematical unless the aircraft is lightly loaded. I’ll try doing the same to see if I can trigger the fault. In any case, best practice is to set landing elevation either before takeoff, or before reaching cruise altitude. 

Thanks for advice. I posted on aerosoft forum. Will see what gives!

[Car147 2,279]

58 minutes ago, omarsmak30 said:

Is this the famous performance issue that came with SU3?

Yup, certainly sounds like it.