October 31, 20214 yr 7 hours ago, beep747 said: For some, the cabin and the cabin details are very important, and I understand. For me, the systems and the flightdeck are. I never visit the cabin. I would be nice to have the option to not load the cabin details and gain extra FPS. As it stands, too heavy on the frames for me. Jos. As long as the cockpit door is closed (and the camera is not inside the cabin) the cabin is not loaded. So, these features do not use up any performance unless you're in the cabin looking at them. The main sources of performance hit with this plane is the SASL coding and lots of 4k textures in the cockpit. The systems and flight modeling is fantastic as expected but I can confirm a significant performance hit on my higher-end system, cabin or no cabin. I'm thinking of resizing all the textures to 4k in gimp or photoshop or something to at the very least keep it above 19.90FPS wherethe FM starts running in less than real time. Edited October 31, 20214 yr by avgaskoolaid
October 31, 20214 yr Author Here are the performance comparison this morning from KLAX/Orbx TE/Enhanced skyscape Default Cessna : 48 fps ToLiss A321neo : 45 fps Zibo 738 : 37 fps iniBuild A300 36 fps FlyJSim Q4XP : 31 fps TBM 900 : 27 fps System Spec 1: Nvidia RTX 4090, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, Res 5120x1440, HP Reverb G2System Spec 2: AMD Radeon RX 7900XT, Intel I-9 9990K, Res 3840x1080, HP Reverb G2
October 31, 20214 yr Video of the performance I am getting https://fsprocedures.com Your home for all flight simulator related checklist.
November 1, 20214 yr After nearly three years of development on the project since the announcement, FlyJSim has wrapped up development and has released the highly awaited aircraft. FlyJSim’s Q4XP can be purchased for $79.95 at the X-Plane.org Store now. As aforementioned, no discount is offered to Q400 Legacy owners. José Luís | Flightsimulator: | MSFS | Add-Ons: | PMDG Douglas DC-6 | PMDG 737-700 | Fenix A320 | Maddog X MD82| FSW CESSNA 414AW CHANCELLOR ||
November 1, 20214 yr Would love to buy it, but i'll wait for it to be available for XP12. I see no reason to further invest into XP11 at this point. From the fps above, well, ouch.. Hopefully there will be some more optimization running. Chock 1.1: "The only thing that whines louder than a jet engine is a flight simmer."
November 1, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, Pastaiolo said: Would love to buy it, but i'll wait for it to be available for XP12. I see no reason to further invest into XP11 at this point. From the fps above, well, ouch.. Hopefully there will be some more optimization running. It all depends on how long it'll take for XP12 to get released. I'm not that sure about it being near, so, with actually no alternatives for civil flight simulation I decided to reinvest in XP11, specially when authors say they will freely port their addons into XP12. I was considering this Q-400, used by SATA which also operates the Q-200, as well as the Toliss A346 🙂 Enhanced Skyscapes brought me a very nice alternative for weather rendering, and latey I am revisiting some great freeware projects, one being that amazing freeware Aeroworx C-47 Alexis linked, as well as Thermal-X https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/130227-aeroworx-douglas-c-47/ Therm-X and a few gliders said to be top-notch for XP11 are my next try 🙂 Edited November 1, 20214 yr by jcomm Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
November 1, 20214 yr 36 minutes ago, jcomm said: It all depends on how long it'll take for XP12 to get released. I'm not that sure about it being near, so, with actually no alternatives for civil flight simulation I decided to reinvest in XP11, specially when authors say they will freely port their addons into XP12. I was considering this Q-400, used by SATA which also operates the Q-200, as well as the Toliss A346 🙂 Enhanced Skyscapes brought me a very nice alternative for weather rendering, and latey I am revisiting some great freeware projects, one being that amazing freeware Aeroworx C-47 Alexis linked, as well as Thermal-X https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/130227-aeroworx-douglas-c-47/ Therm-X and a few gliders said to be top-notch for XP11 are my next try 🙂 Even if it took XP12 10 more years, i'll wait for that for the simple reason XP11 visual wise holds no value compared to other competitors and as much as i enjoy the flight dynamics (it is what made me switch from FSX to XP10 and then XP11 after all) the eye wants to see something too. And, in my opinion, what we have graphics wise are small band aids (some great attempts too, like Enhanced Skyscapes, but still attempts). I had the Majestic Q400 for FSX and it was a fun bird, i am sure this will be too. If i was you, i would go for this since it offers a different style of flying (while the A346 likely won't compared to another smaller Bus). Chock 1.1: "The only thing that whines louder than a jet engine is a flight simmer."
November 1, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, jcomm said: It all depends on how long it'll take for XP12 to get released. I'm not that sure about it being near, so, with actually no alternatives for civil flight simulation I decided to reinvest in XP11, specially when authors say they will freely port their addons into XP12. I was considering this Q-400, used by SATA which also operates the Q-200, as well as the Toliss A346 🙂 Enhanced Skyscapes brought me a very nice alternative for weather rendering, and latey I am revisiting some great freeware projects, one being that amazing freeware Aeroworx C-47 Alexis linked, as well as Thermal-X https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/130227-aeroworx-douglas-c-47/ Therm-X and a few gliders said to be top-notch for XP11 are my next try 🙂 I dare to ask how long ? Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus
November 1, 20214 yr Author 4 hours ago, Pastaiolo said: Would love to buy it, but i'll wait for it to be available for XP12. I see no reason to further invest into XP11 at this point. From the fps above, well, ouch.. Hopefully there will be some more optimization running. Both A346 and Q400 will cover X-Plane 11 and X-Plane 12. Aerobask also mention they will support X-Plane 12. At this late stage, I imagine all developer will make their aircraft supported by XP12 otherwise nobody will buy them. "X-Plane 11Support for X-Plane 11 and X-Plane 12 when availableWindows, Mac or Linux4 GB VRAM Minimum - 8 GB+ VRAM RecommendedDownload Size: 1.5 GBCurrent version: 1.0 (October 30th 2021)" System Spec 1: Nvidia RTX 4090, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, Res 5120x1440, HP Reverb G2System Spec 2: AMD Radeon RX 7900XT, Intel I-9 9990K, Res 3840x1080, HP Reverb G2
November 1, 20214 yr Nice article on why SASL and other plugins eats frame in Xplane 11 https://www.thresholdx.net/article/pluopt https://fsprocedures.com Your home for all flight simulator related checklist.
November 1, 20214 yr 23 hours ago, Sims Smith said: Here are the performance comparison this morning from KLAX/Orbx TE/Enhanced skyscape Default Cessna : 48 fps ToLiss A321neo : 45 fps Zibo 738 : 37 fps iniBuild A300 36 fps FlyJSim Q4XP : 31 fps TBM 900 : 27 fps Unless I misused my calculator, that's a ~35% FPS hit. A bit worse than the usual 30% with other SASL-driven aircraft (FJS 727, etc.). 7950X3D + 7900 XT + 64 GB + Linux | 4800H + RTX2060 + 32 GB + Linux My add-ons from my FS9/FSX days
November 2, 20214 yr 9 hours ago, mjrhealth said: Got it few hrs ago. Its abt a 5 to7 fps according to plugin manager Great! That is only about 6%!
November 2, 20214 yr @fogboundturtle Thanks for that link !!! Excellent !!!! Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
Create an account or sign in to comment