August 25, 20223 yr I'm not associated with the vendor in any way. It popped up on my browser. Probably because I own the P3D version of the 310?Cessna 310P Custom Airplane Model | Custom Cessna Aircraft Model (aviatorgear.com) Hardware: i7-8700k, GTX 1070-ti, 32GB ram, NVMe/SSD drives with lots of free space. Software: latest Windows 10 Pro, P3Dv4.5+, FSX Steam, and lots of addons (100+ mostly Orbx stuff).
August 25, 20223 yr 16 minutes ago, bofhlusr said: I'm not associated with the vendor in any way. It popped up on my browser. Probably because I own the P3D version of the 310?Cessna 310P Custom Airplane Model | Custom Cessna Aircraft Model (aviatorgear.com) Is it compatible with the Garmin 750? If not - not interested! Rob (but call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind). I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio. Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's. Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.
August 25, 20223 yr My wife already thinks I'm a little too obsessed. Imagine if I put that down on the sideboard 😁 9950X3D - X870E Aorus Master- TUF 5090 OC - 64GB DDR5 - 1500W HXi - Titan 360 RX LCD - 9100 Pro x 2 - LG 45GX950A - HOTAS Warthog with Ava Base
August 25, 20223 yr How are the flight dynamics? If I throw it, will the cruise range be accurate ? 😂 Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
August 25, 20223 yr Author 4 minutes ago, St Mawgan said: My wife already thinks I'm a little too obsessed. Imagine if I put that down on the sideboard 😁 The trick to making your significant half very very happy about your flight sim purchases is to show them how much money you are saving them from not buying the real thing. Send them the picture below. And make sure you tell them also that the price below doesn't include the cost of installation! Lol. Hardware: i7-8700k, GTX 1070-ti, 32GB ram, NVMe/SSD drives with lots of free space. Software: latest Windows 10 Pro, P3Dv4.5+, FSX Steam, and lots of addons (100+ mostly Orbx stuff).
August 25, 20223 yr The Milviz c310 is the most in depth modern GA addon. (That old school boing 247 I think is the most in depth but I'm not sure how many people are flying it). Supports no gps, stock GNS 530, 2x TDS GTN 750 Xi and the PMS 750/650. I highly recommend it - flight model is spot on. SP1 is coming soon TM. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
August 25, 20223 yr 13 minutes ago, ryanbatc said: The Milviz c310 is the most in depth modern GA addon. (That old school boing 247 I think is the most in depth but I'm not sure how many people are flying it). Supports no gps, stock GNS 530, 2x TDS GTN 750 Xi and the PMS 750/650. I highly recommend it - flight model is spot on. SP1 is coming soon TM. I agree, the C 310 is the best GA aircraft so far in MSFS..
August 25, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Bobsk8 said: I agree, the C 310 is the best GA aircraft so far in MSFS.. I prefer the C414 but it's not as in depth as the C310. I do fly the 310 fairly often though as it's challenging to get it into a short strip - I'd say the flight model has a wing up (lol) on the 414. The 414 is the best in the visual department though. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
August 25, 20223 yr Author 27 minutes ago, ryanbatc said: The Milviz c310 is the most in depth modern GA addon. (That old school boing 247 I think is the most in depth but I'm not sure how many people are flying it). Supports no gps, stock GNS 530, 2x TDS GTN 750 Xi and the PMS 750/650. I highly recommend it - flight model is spot on. SP1 is coming soon TM. The only reason I hesitate to buy is because I prefer the panel of their 310 in P3D: P3D: Hardware: i7-8700k, GTX 1070-ti, 32GB ram, NVMe/SSD drives with lots of free space. Software: latest Windows 10 Pro, P3Dv4.5+, FSX Steam, and lots of addons (100+ mostly Orbx stuff).
August 25, 20223 yr 7 minutes ago, bofhlusr said: The only reason I hesitate to buy is because I prefer the panel of their 310 in P3D: You can't find one combo you'd like in MSFS? They have more options. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
August 25, 20223 yr Author There's something about how the panel in the MSFS version is laid out that bugs me. Perhaps it's those large blank spaces. Maybe I'm just being shallow? But with regards to MSFS, my graphics expectations are higher and different compared to older sims. Since I think I have way more planes in P3D than I'll ever get to fully use, I'm only looking for aircraft with features in MSFS that are not available in older sims. The 414 would be very nice after they add additional circuit breakers and if they add more maintenance items similar to what A2A did in P3D. Hardware: i7-8700k, GTX 1070-ti, 32GB ram, NVMe/SSD drives with lots of free space. Software: latest Windows 10 Pro, P3Dv4.5+, FSX Steam, and lots of addons (100+ mostly Orbx stuff).
August 25, 20223 yr Not sure if I understand this thread. Does the OP actually want input from 310 owners in MSFS in order perhaps to sway him over to purchasing it? I have the aircraft and along with the 414 it's one of my favourite GA in MSFS. But it does seem that the OP has already made up his mind? Sorry if I misunderstand, long day at work... 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
August 25, 20223 yr Author 8 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said: Not sure if I understand this thread. Does the OP actually want input from 310 owners in MSFS in order perhaps to sway him over to purchasing it? I have the aircraft and along with the 414 it's one of my favourite GA in MSFS. But it does seem that the OP has already made up his mind? Sorry if I misunderstand, long day at work... Sorry, no I'm not looking for input. I'm responding to @ryanbatc question. I should have quoted him. Btw, he mentioned that the 414 is not as in-depth as the 310. Out of curiosity and since you own both, I wonder if you know off hand why the 310 is more in-depth in comparison. Thanks. Hardware: i7-8700k, GTX 1070-ti, 32GB ram, NVMe/SSD drives with lots of free space. Software: latest Windows 10 Pro, P3Dv4.5+, FSX Steam, and lots of addons (100+ mostly Orbx stuff).
August 25, 20223 yr 48 minutes ago, bofhlusr said: Sorry, no I'm not looking for input. I'm responding to @ryanbatc question. I should have quoted him. Btw, he mentioned that the 414 is not as in-depth as the 310. Out of curiosity and since you own both, I wonder if you know off hand why the 310 is more in-depth in comparison. Thanks. No worries. I find both the 414 and 310 to be excellent and I find that the money I invested in them has been well worth it. The 414 lacks some of the more in-depth features that the 310 has (failures, maintenance simulation, dirt accretion over time), which I'm sure you're familiar with from P3D. I agree with Ryan that in terms of visuals the 414 is a tad better, but not by much. Ryan also mentioned that perhaps the 310 has the upper hand in terms of the flight model. As there also are other differences (the 414 has a pressurized cabin and flies higher and faster) I'm happy to have both, as they serve different needs. I'm sure @ryanbatc will be able to elaborate 🙂 Edited August 25, 20223 yr by Cpt_Piett 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
August 25, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, bofhlusr said: Sorry, no I'm not looking for input. I'm responding to @ryanbatc question. I should have quoted him. Btw, he mentioned that the 414 is not as in-depth as the 310. Out of curiosity and since you own both, I wonder if you know off hand why the 310 is more in-depth in comparison. Thanks. The 310 has working breakers that will pop with misuse - there is a failure model (can be disabled). Basically, abusing your aircraft will cause things to fail. The 414 doesn't really do that outside of a few default based items (can't remember those off the top of my head). I'd say the sound pack on the 310 has the upper hand as well. Both twins support the TDS and PMS GTNs. The 310 is a typical flyer in the 5000-10k altitude stratum while the 414 is better in the high teens to lower 20's FL. Down low they cruise about the same speed while higher the 414 wins - it's turbocharged and pressurized. Both are equipped for flight into known icing. Edited August 25, 20223 yr by ryanbatc | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.