It almost looks like a transparent transformer!

Looks like a booger on the camera lens! 

OH, worse!  It's a Madbum snotrocket!

 

Wow! hears another one. Oh wait its a guy in a jet pack.

 

16 minutes ago, charliearon said:

Looks like a booger on the camera lens! 

 

That was my first thought. The camera moves independantly of the object though. So I'm thinking if it is debris, then it must be on some kind of window in front of the camera and the camera panning behind it.

Without knowing what took the images and how the camera was designed, its hard to say. People are of course embarrassing themselves on the internet claiming its a cloaked alien ship. 🙄

I'm convinced its a guy in a get pack. The translucence is an artifact of the background ghosting across him because of the frequency of the camera which is to low to keep up with the pace the object across the background. I'm very familiar with this phenomenon because I see it all the time in my very bad MSFS graphical setup!😁 There is something hanging down from the jet pack that's about the same length as his legs and because its so grainy (as usual!) along with his legs it looks like tentacles.

On second thoughts I like the smudge theory too. I can imagine that camera being on a gimbal in a glass dome. That would also give the impression that it was the object that was being tracked when it fact its just purely incidental to the observations being made.

Edited January 10, 20242 yr by FBW737

We need to see the part where it allegedly goes under water for several minutes then resurfaces and flies off at a high speed. I wonder why Corbell didn't release that part.

"Argument from Ignorance".

Full video.

 

 

1 hour ago, FBW737 said:

I'm convinced its a guy in a get pack.

 

Actually, it really does look like a guy in a jet pack. 🤔 Unusual place to fly one though, over Iraq.

2 hours ago, FBW737 said:

I'm convinced its a guy in a get pack.

Except jet packs are noisy, aren't they? This one flew over four people and they didn't look up.

 

1 hour ago, martin-w said:

Full video.

But no diving into the water. Does that mean they were told about that part of the video but couldn't obtain it?

"The UAP displayed low observability - The UAP was not visible with Night Vision (IR) and appeared to jam the targeting capability of the optical platform."

What do they mean by "optical platform"? 

I’m the last one to jump on the UFO/UAP bandwagon, but with the number of occurrences all over the world, there must be something to it. Whether it’s a doctored video (as a fair number are) or a reasonable explanation of some sort. Don’t know how many on here have seen the Mystery at Skinwalker ranch series, but these are reputable persons of science trying to determine what’s happening there. They’ve captured video of of many objects, one of which passed through one side of a mesa and out the other. Anomalies that exhibit the characteristics of black holes.

So, what ever is going on, I’m certain that the governments of the world are keeping the general public in the dark about it.

I do agree I with Christopher Low, it does strongly resemble a transparent transformer being super imposed on the video.

If I ever see it, I’ll just pour another glass of bourbon (or switch brands).

This video, like many others, looks fake.  That flying object looks superimposed on the background video.

It is interesting to me that over the past few years the UFO argument has gone so mainstream, with even parts of the govt. acknowledging the issue. It is being hyped by the media, and that alone tells me to be distrustful.

This govt. acknowledgement is a red flag to me.  The U.S. govt. in particular uses psyops like this to distract from what they don't want the public to know about or focus on.

Dave

Looks like a drone with a costume to me... similar to the LAX jetpacks.  The "costume" appears completely rigid with no movement or flex, and the flight path looks consistent with a drone (static mostly, with some smooth change of altitude only).