March 8, 20242 yr 9 hours ago, Luis Hernandez said: Does it still take ages to load? It does, but in my experience it is strongly CPU-related. Could take up to 5 mn with my old 10700K, takes under 2mn with my brand new 7800X3D. Anyway, such a masterpiece, it could take 20mn to load, I would not fly without it. 😁 Edited March 8, 20242 yr by RockOla
March 8, 20242 yr Works fine on my system. Framerates vary between 30 (Gatwick + FSTL + real weather) to upper 50s. Overall, performance seems much smoother than previous builds. I have nothing to complain about.
March 8, 20242 yr Have in mind that GSX also slows down the Startup of MSFS by Minutes (not seconds). If you don´t use it, unlink it in the FSDT-Installer.
March 8, 20242 yr 17 hours ago, Luis Hernandez said: Does it still take ages to load? It's on my system not that long (80 seconds to be precise), but the 3d stuff and textures are less heavy in the fps and vram department... running the aigtech controller on my e-cores 😎 Live traffic is great but for me personal not that important since I fly on different times in the sim... André
March 8, 20242 yr 7 hours ago, ErichB said: I'm definitely experiencing reduced FPS following the B2 upgrade. Is here local great at AMS 100 + fps with AIG 50% and 2K ultra settings... André
March 8, 20242 yr framerate is working well for me with my outdated system I7-7700K oc. / 1080Ti, adjusted for 30fps and most sliders at 100, have a main 55" and 4 instruments at 2 additional screens with Panel Popout Manager and most of the system functiones set to external hardware from Goflight. Ralf Andreas
April 29, 20242 yr I'm finding MSFS and this Fenix A320 heavier than P3D and FSLabs... (I could be doing something very wrong...) PS: I don't like FG. 13600KF - AIO - 32GB DDR4 - RTX4070 - UW1440p GSync - USB DAC - 2TB NVMe - Windows 11 Pro - Gladiator NXT EVO - 1 Gbps Fiber - MSFS 2024
April 29, 20242 yr 34 minutes ago, Juliett Alfa Romeo said: I'm finding MSFS and this Fenix A320 heavier than P3D and FSLabs... Turn down MSFS to P3D visuals and I doubt that FPS will be lower in the Fenix A320. Greetings, Chris AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 2x32GB DDR5 6000MT/s RAM, MSI RTX 4090 Ventus 3X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS2024
April 29, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, AnkH said: Turn down MSFS to P3D visuals and I doubt that FPS will be lower in the Fenix A320. Turning off photogrammetry? for that I wouldn't have bought MSFS... What makes all the difference with P3D is the photogrammetry, TAA and the "lighting" ambient/effects. I honestly thought that the leap in performance that everyone was talking about would be more obvious... PS: The 737NG is lighter in terms of FPS. Edited April 29, 20242 yr by Juliett Alfa Romeo 13600KF - AIO - 32GB DDR4 - RTX4070 - UW1440p GSync - USB DAC - 2TB NVMe - Windows 11 Pro - Gladiator NXT EVO - 1 Gbps Fiber - MSFS 2024
April 29, 20242 yr 27 minutes ago, Juliett Alfa Romeo said: Turning off photogrammetry? for that I wouldn't have bought MSFS... Are you perhaps mistaking photogrammetry (i.e. Google Earth-style buildings) for orthographic scenery for the entire world? Orthography/photoscenery for the ground in MSFS is fantastic (far superior to landclass textures). The often 'melted buildings' PG, not so much. And certainly not for the performance hit you can have when airliner flying. Edited April 29, 20242 yr by F737MAX AMD Ryzen 5800X3D; MSI RTX 3080 Ti ; 32GB Corsair 3200 MHz; ASUS VG35VQ 35" (3440 x 1440) Fulcrum One yoke; Thrustmaster TCA Captain Pack Airbus edition; MFG Crosswind rudder pedals; miniCockpit FCU; CPFlight MCP 737; Logitech FIP x3; TrackIR MSFS; Fenix A320; A2A PA-24; HPG H145; PMDG 737-600; AIG; RealTraffic; PSXTraffic; FSiPanel; REX AccuSeason Adv; FSDT GSX Pro; FS2Crew RAAS Pro; FS-ATC Chatter
April 29, 20242 yr 31 minutes ago, Juliett Alfa Romeo said: Turning off photogrammetry? for that I wouldn't have bought MSFS... What makes all the difference with P3D is the photogrammetry, the TAA and the "lighting" effects. I honestly thought that the leap in performance that everyone was talking about would be more obvious... PS: The 737NG is lighter in terms of FPS. I flew P3D for years. After flying MSFS, going back to P3D is like going back to a dial up modem.
April 29, 20242 yr 17 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: Much better FPS with the Fenix since I started using Auto FPS I'll try it out. 13600KF - AIO - 32GB DDR4 - RTX4070 - UW1440p GSync - USB DAC - 2TB NVMe - Windows 11 Pro - Gladiator NXT EVO - 1 Gbps Fiber - MSFS 2024
April 29, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: I flew P3D for years. After flying MSFS, going back to P3D is like going back to a dial up modem. It's not that. I'm not feeling the leap in performance that everyone is talking about... 13600KF - AIO - 32GB DDR4 - RTX4070 - UW1440p GSync - USB DAC - 2TB NVMe - Windows 11 Pro - Gladiator NXT EVO - 1 Gbps Fiber - MSFS 2024
April 29, 20242 yr 10 minutes ago, F737MAX said: Are you perhaps mistaking photogrammetry (i.e. Google Earth-style buildings) for orthographic scenery for the entire world? Orthography/photoscenery for the ground in MSFS is fantastic (far superior to landclass textures). The often 'melted buildings' PG, not so much. And certainly not for the performance hit you can have when airliner flying. (oh God the MSFS's loading time...) I'm talking about this: It's not something I want to turn off... 13600KF - AIO - 32GB DDR4 - RTX4070 - UW1440p GSync - USB DAC - 2TB NVMe - Windows 11 Pro - Gladiator NXT EVO - 1 Gbps Fiber - MSFS 2024
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.