First let me say I have good internet speeds and my PC can handle 2020 and 2024 with now issues. What I don’t like is how 2024 loads texture data right in front of me as I’m flying along. Reminds me of the old P3D days. Is there a setting that can have data load faster? I flew around downtown Atlanta, unless you’re right on top of the city it looks like it was melting. I have LOD set to 200 and upped cache to 64. I know 2024 is my cloud based but it kills the immersion. 

Edited December 1, 20241 yr by Wise87

Crank up LOD.

 

In the tech alpha, everything was seamless. I cant recall ever having to wait for textures to load. Nor watching any streamers have the issue. 
Now in the full game, I do.

Theyre having server issues (despite what they say). Just wait until its resolved.

Edited December 1, 20241 yr by FedDriver

1 minute ago, FedDriver said:

 

Theyre having server issues (despite what they say). Just wait until its resolved.

If this ever happens, i am not shure about that, this streaming ( the whole infrastructure ) should be overworked so there Server has less to load, means they should give the using people more data to save so the amount of data to the Servers is more less.

And if you apply that to all users who use MSFS2024, it will definitely add up to a lot of data and I think that would really help with streaming performance. It wouldn't bother me one bit if the MSFS2024, for example, took 15 minutes to load but streamed much better.

cheers 😉

13 minutes ago, pmplayer said:

If this ever happens, i am not shure about that, this streaming ( the whole infrastructure ) should be overworked so there Server has less to load, means they should give the using people more data to save so the amount of data to the Servers is more less.

And if you apply that to all users who use MSFS2024, it will definitely add up to a lot of data and I think that would really help with streaming performance. It wouldn't bother me one bit if the MSFS2024, for example, took 15 minutes to load but streamed much better.

cheers 😉

Yes. I purchased a 4 TB M.2 SSD exclusively for MSFS 2024, now I have 60 GB on this drive.

Just now, Nemo said:

Yes. Some months ago, I purchased a 4 TB M.2 SSD exclusively for MSFS 2024, now I have 60 GB on this drive.

 

6 hours ago, Wise87 said:

First let me say I have good internet speeds and my PC can handle 2020 and 2024 with now issues. What I don’t like is how 2024 loads texture data right in front of me as I’m flying along. Reminds me of the old P3D days. Is there a setting that can have data load faster? I flew around downtown Atlanta, unless you’re right on top of the city it looks like it was melting. I have LOD set to 200 and upped cache to 64. I know 2024 is my cloud based but it kills the immersion. 

Crank up your Terrain Level of Detail.

Edited December 1, 20241 yr by abrams_tank

43 minutes ago, Nemo said:

Yes. I purchased a 4 TB M.2 SSD exclusively for MSFS 2024, now I have 60 GB on this drive.

You weren't paying much attention, eh? 😉

Just increase the size of your rolling cache to 1 TB then. That way most of the stuff you stream will stay on your drive.

It doesn't happen to me. I use 200 both LODS. DLSS Quality. Render preset ULTRA. My hardware specs are not top notch, to be sure.

Probably won't help but in general settings, try multiplayer channel equal  to USA West, or whatever it's called. That may connect you to USA West server for everything MSFS, I don't know. I live in Western USA, no problems with scenery loading during flight. I see on the official forum, some people are saying to try USA West.

Just an update. I turned off the Dynamic Settings. I had it set to my monitors refresh rate, 120  and it looks like DS was trying to keep me at 120 FPS so it would sacrifice LOD and texture quality in order to maintain it. Things are greatly improved, not perfect but much, much better then before now that it is off.  

10 hours ago, Wise87 said:

First let me say I have good internet speeds and my PC can handle 2020 and 2024 with now issues. What I don’t like is how 2024 loads texture data right in front of me as I’m flying along. Reminds me of the old P3D days. Is there a setting that can have data load faster? I flew around downtown Atlanta, unless you’re right on top of the city it looks like it was melting. I have LOD set to 200 and upped cache to 64. I know 2024 is my cloud based but it kills the immersion. 

I have high end system and 2gb internet.  Have same issue.  I will raise lod but the sim is really consuming more resources than it should as I have largely vanilla sim loaded.

12 minutes ago, Wise87 said:

Just an update. I turned off the Dynamic Settings. I had it set to my monitors refresh rate, 120  and it looks like DS was trying to keep me at 120 FPS so it would sacrifice LOD and texture quality in order to maintain it. Things are greatly improved, not perfect but much, much better then before now that it is off.  

To be honest, you don't need 120 FPS for a flight simulator. Now I play on 1080 FPS, but I have my FPS capped at 25 FPS, because my graphics card (RTX 3060 Ti) is getting quite hot when it runs MSFS 2024.  25 FPS is fine for me, I honestly think it's smooth enough (I remember when FSX came out, I was playing off of 15 FPS at times).

When you lower the FPS, you have more room to crank up the rest of the settings in MSFS. For example, given a good system, you could run at 60 FPS at Ultra settings for everything, or you could run at 120 FPS at High settings for everything. I don't know about you, but I would choose 60 FPS for Ultra settings over 120 FPS at High settings, especially since the human eye can only differentiate between 30 FPS to 60 FPS: https://www.sighthound.com/blog/human-eye-fps-vs-ai-why-ai-is-better

120 FPS is only really needed if you are playing games like Counter Strike at pro level.  I doubt that even an amateur Counter Strike player needs 120 FPS, they are probably fine at 60 FPS.  Certainly for a flight simulator, anything over 60 FPS is probably indistinguishable, if that scientific study cited above is accurate.

Edited December 1, 20241 yr by abrams_tank

49 minutes ago, abrams_tank said:

To be honest, you don't need 120 FPS for a flight simulator. Now I play on 1080 FPS, but I have my FPS capped at 25 FPS, because my graphics card (RTX 3060 Ti) is getting quite hot when it runs MSFS 2024.  25 FPS is fine for me, I honestly think it's smooth enough (I remember when FSX came out, I was playing off of 15 FPS at times).

When you lower the FPS, you have more room to crank up the rest of the settings in MSFS. For example, given a good system, you could run at 60 FPS at Ultra settings for everything, or you could run at 120 FPS at High settings for everything. I don't know about you, but I would choose 60 FPS for Ultra settings over 120 FPS at High settings, especially since the human eye can only differentiate between 30 FPS to 60 FPS: https://www.sighthound.com/blog/human-eye-fps-vs-ai-why-ai-is-better

120 FPS is only really needed if you are playing games like Counter Strike at pro level.  I doubt that even an amateur Counter Strike player needs 120 FPS, they are probably fine at 60 FPS.  Certainly for a flight simulator, anything over 60 FPS is probably indistinguishable, if that scientific study cited above is accurate.

At last, somebody gets it Like you, I can live quite happily with 25fps in MSFS. My framerate is set to Unlimited, so it varies to a considerable extent. Nevertheless, I can still maintain playable performance at IniBuilds EGLL London Heathrow with 100% AIG AI active @ 1080p resolution.......on my 2015 specification PC.  I have to pinch myself sometimes to make sure that I am not dreaming....

1 hour ago, abrams_tank said:

To be honest, you don't need 120 FPS for a flight simulator. Now I play on 1080 FPS, but I have my FPS capped at 25 FPS, because my graphics card (RTX 3060 Ti) is getting quite hot when it runs MSFS 2024.  25 FPS is fine for me, I honestly think it's smooth enough (I remember when FSX came out, I was playing off of 15 FPS at times).

When you lower the FPS, you have more room to crank up the rest of the settings in MSFS. For example, given a good system, you could run at 60 FPS at Ultra settings for everything, or you could run at 120 FPS at High settings for everything. I don't know about you, but I would choose 60 FPS for Ultra settings over 120 FPS at High settings, especially since the human eye can only differentiate between 30 FPS to 60 FPS: https://www.sighthound.com/blog/human-eye-fps-vs-ai-why-ai-is-better

120 FPS is only really needed if you are playing games like Counter Strike at pro level.  I doubt that even an amateur Counter Strike player needs 120 FPS, they are probably fine at 60 FPS.  Certainly for a flight simulator, anything over 60 FPS is probably indistinguishable, if that scientific study cited above is accurate.

I was just as convinced as you are and was happily using 30FPS for years... until frame generation came along, turning 30FPS into 60 FPS, and now I cannot for the love of god return to 30 FPS.

29 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

I was just as convinced as you are and was happily using 30FPS for years... until frame generation came along, turning 30FPS into 60 FPS, and now I cannot for the love of god return to 30 FPS.

I was playing MSFS 2024 at 60 FPS, before I noticed my GPU was overheating.  I was lucky enough to have a 2 hour session once at 60 FPS without my GPU running into problems. Then I had to lower the FPS to prevent my GPU from overheating. Honestly, I can't tell the difference between 30 FPS and 60 FPS for MSFS 2024, but maybe need to play it side by side, one with 30 FPS on the left side, one with 60 FPS on the right side, to notice the difference.

Edited December 1, 20241 yr by abrams_tank