The A350 runs extremely well in 2020. I was worried but I couldn't be more happy with the performance. On my 4th flight today to airports such as KMCO, KDTW, KATL and KMSP. Smooth as can be with traffic and Ultra/High settings. 

I wanna buy this just so I can compare VRAM usage between the Sims.  

And maybe I can do a ACJ paint lol

Has anyone done that yet?  

 

for 2024 the inimanger gives the option to install lower res textures.

there's also a option in the EFB to unload model parts the camera isn't looking at. Again only for 2024 I believe as it uses a new feature added in 2024.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Tuskin38

People forget how heavy FENIX was at launch and how long it took them to optimize the A320. Inibuilds has been doing a great job in bringing A300, A310, A320N, A321 (FS24), A330 (FS24) and now A350 with really great results.

I am having a really good time flying the A350 in FS2024 beta SU1.

3 hours ago, ttbq1 said:

People forget how heavy FENIX was at launch and how long it took them to optimize the A320. Inibuilds has been doing a great job in bringing A300, A310, A320N, A321 (FS24), A330 (FS24) and now A350 with really great results.

I am having a really good time flying the A350 in FS2024 beta SU1.

True but none of the inibuilds aircraft are near the level of fidelity of the Fenix A320/321 or 319 and that same level of detail applies to the FS Labs A321 and Leonardo Maddog X. Not saying Ini products are bad or anything but they are not on the same level. PMDG is up there too.

PS Ini is a major partner with a multi billion company who happens to own the rights of this title.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by JBDB-MD80

36 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

True but none of the inibuilds aircraft are near the level of fidelity of the Fenix A320/321 or 319 and that same level of detail applies to the FS Labs A321 and Leonardo Maddog X. Not saying Ini products are bad or anything but they are not on the same level. PMDG is up there too.

I beg to differ. The A350 is on the level of Fenix or will be when inibuilds clean up some things and add some future systems that can only be done in FS2024. Give them sometime like we gave Fenix to mature into a very well-done aircraft.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Bigmack

3 hours ago, ttbq1 said:

People forget how heavy FENIX was at launch and how long it took them to optimize the A320. Inibuilds has been doing a great job in bringing A300, A310, A320N, A321 (FS24), A330 (FS24) and now A350 with really great results.

I am having a really good time flying the A350 in FS2024 beta SU1.

FENIX is small developer compared to ini and yes I admit it’s been a long journey.. but Fenix has more deeper systems than ini and much more complex aircraft on their hand and still they pulled it off..

 

1 hour ago, Aboodyking said:

FENIX is small developer compared to ini and yes I admit it’s been a long journey.. but Fenix has more deeper systems than ini and much more complex aircraft on their hand and still they pulled it off..

 

To be fair, Fenix piggy backed off of ProSim for the original A320 release. Although since the release in 2022, they may have restructured or even removed some of the ProSim code and replaced it with their own custom code (I don't know if they did, I just know the original A320 they released in 2022 was using the ProSim engine).

I think that's a reason why the Fenix A320 was so in depth when it was released back in 2022 (but there may be other reasons).

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by abrams_tank

Performance is really bad...what a disappointment, 20fps less than PMDG 777 in the same airport, taxi is horrible, back to PMDG

Performance in MSFS 2020 is excellent for me, just did delivery flight LFBO-EGLL, got the usual fluidity - even with PSXT/AIG models shown via ADS-B on the ND 🙂

Happy Inibuilds customer here.

13 minutes ago, SierraDelta said:

Performance in MSFS 2020 is excellent for me, just did delivery flight LFBO-EGLL, got the usual fluidity - even with PSXT/AIG models shown via ADS-B on the ND 🙂

Happy Inibuilds customer here.

+1 after initial issues, running great here in MSFS2020. Very happy! 🙂

2 hours ago, miguel370 said:

Performance is really bad...what a disappointment, 20fps less than PMDG 777 in the same airport, taxi is horrible, back to PMDG

I'm running my settings at Ultra/High and my differences between the A350 and the 777-300ER are around 10 FPS. I give the slight difference due to the glass cockpit of the A350. 

I'm at iniBuild KLAX, 25R with static aircraft, and I average around 100 FPS with Frame generation. Both planes are smooth on taxi and departure and FPS for both flux +/- 10FPS. 

On my system they are both comparable in performance. I also find the plane taxis great using my Cat3Design airbus tiller.

A350 FPS Native FPS

A350 FPS with FG

777-300ER Native FPS

777-300ER FPS with FG

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Wise87

I have watched streamers who say turning the cabin off makes a huge difference.  I don’t own this plane though so no idea.

1 minute ago, jspilot said:

I have watched streamers who say turning the cabin off makes a huge difference.  I don’t own this plane though so no idea.

This topic is about the 2020 version. It doesn’t have a cabin so it’s off already.

So, it has a terrible performance in FS20 (FS24 is the same probably?), only inventing frames with FG DLSS etc. solve it, with the people that like, want, and can use that, so the terrible performance is there if you like or not.

The worst of all flying next to them in online even is the 350, it is lamentable how developers abandon over the time and don´t do they work to their customers that are paying for that, with their online aircrafts and optimise they online model represented to other users in online.

350 is the king of bad performance, then FBW 380, then PMDG 777, very close between them, if you have bad performance take in account if you have these aircrafts near you also in online, if you don´t have the generics optimized online planes in options, DLSS FG etc. etc. etc. doing the job that developers don´t do.

In VR is terrible. I don´t have the Fenix to compare but if it is similar to the former, no thanks.

Anyway great to bring this plane to MSFSs, really thanks, and hope they want to optimize it and do a better work.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by peloto