37 minutes ago, MaximumN2 said:

FSLabs is still ahead when it comes to Airbus. Fenix has some work to do to surpass FSLabs in terms of depth and systems

The msfs version of flabs still has a lot of issues under the hood.

4 minutes ago, Pilot53 said:

The msfs version of flabs still has a lot of issues under the hood.

True, but it's still the better Airbus simulation.

Maybe Fenix can surpass it one day, hopefully, but at the moment, FSLabs is still a fair bit more complete.

Not from what I'm seeing per bugs reported. Is better in some aspects but not many. If it truely was good you would see alot of streamers using it way more than the Fenix.

Edited Tuesday at 01:46 AM2 days by carlanthony24

5 hours ago, ahsmatt7 said:

Good job for Fenix. They are becoming what PMDG use to be for the community. They are top of the line with their airbii. I’m excited to see what comes from all the hard work they are doing.

Not becoming, already are and far exceeded.

The Fenix Airbus line is amazing.

Jase

6 hours ago, carlanthony24 said:

Not from what I'm seeing per bugs reported. Is better in some aspects but not many. If it truely was good you would see alot of streamers using it way more than the Fenix.

That's not the reason, but it's okay. The reason is the Fenix cult, the poor modelling (which is true, unfortunately), and the fact that it's just another Airbus when everyone already had one. It has nothing to do with which of them is the better add-on.

And "streamers" aren't a good source. They usually just follow what the masses do; and the mass are like kids who love good-looking toys like the Fenix. That's why you get people claiming that Fenix is the top-of-the-line developer and has surpassed PMDG by a wide margin. If you say something like that, you've lost all credibility and are obviously completely clueless.

I like the Fenix but I find hand-flying it really weird. I always end up to the right of the runway centreline and it feels like it does the opposite to what you'd expect when a crosswind is in place. The A319 especially seems to love to sink on approach (especially in CONF3) whereas the 321 flies perfectly fine.

No other Airbus (FSLabs, ToLiss family on XP, even the default A330 and Inibuilds 320 Neo) gives me the same result.

Maybe it's a sim issue though - I feel like it's gotten much worse with SU5.

What news is it that you seek ?

Can't wait for the updates! For me, Fenix is just on another level in MSFS. From my perspective, nothing else even comes close. The cockpit textures, displays, sounds, cabin interiors, performance, etc. are unrivaled. I honestly only use Fenix aircraft in MSFS 2024

Edited Tuesday at 11:52 AM1 day by juaness

1 hour ago, Max Kraus said:

What news is it that you seek ?

I just enjoy reading the updates as on their blog. Was wondering if they posted any new screenshots or short videos of the state.

4 hours ago, MaximumN2 said:

That's not the reason, but it's okay. The reason is the Fenix cult, the poor modelling (which is true, unfortunately), and the fact that it's just another Airbus when everyone already had one. It has nothing to do with which of them is the better add-on.

And "streamers" aren't a good source. They usually just follow what the masses do; and the mass are like kids who love good-looking toys like the Fenix. That's why you get people claiming that Fenix is the top-of-the-line developer and has surpassed PMDG by a wide margin. If you say something like that, you've lost all credibility and are obviously completely clueless.

It really is performance is just not where it should be and the bugs prove it especially when it still had P3D bugs on release. Seeing a video on the forum it cannot do a tear drop hold. Another video showing that it cannot meet a hard speed restriction. Streamers are good source. Some openly admitted they’re prefer the flare in the FSLabs but can’t get past the bugs and performance issues. Quite strange that a bug report showing for the flare in the NEO was broken though

Let’s be real it is a top tier developer like FSLabs and more so than PMDG. If you thinks it’s worst than PMDG you are the clueless one.

Edited Tuesday at 12:43 PM1 day by carlanthony24

2 hours ago, carlanthony24 said:

Let’s be real it is a top tier developer like FSLabs and more so than PMDG. If you thinks it’s worst than PMDG you are the clueless one.

As someone who has flown the A319, A320, and A321 for years and is now flying the 777, I can confidently say that the PMDG aircraft are more accurate in every single aspect.

What Real Life experience do you have that led you to a different conclusion?

Geez and I just came here for some Fenix news as I do not refer to discord? So I guess there isn't much new news?

19 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Geez and I just came here for some Fenix news as I do not refer to discord? So I guess there isn't much new news?

Look at my post near the bottom of page 1.

Edited Tuesday at 03:46 PM1 day by Tuskin38

1 hour ago, MaximumN2 said:

As someone who has flown the A319, A320, and A321 for years and is now flying the 777, I can confidently say that the PMDG aircraft are more accurate in every single aspect.

What Real Life experience do you have that led you to a different conclusion?

Enough to be able to be on the flightdeck has well. Have been typed on 320, 321 has crew. Other pilots also disagree with what you say. Crazy how far PMDG is below standard is not the once top tier dev they use to be and you see the Boeing type rated pilots on the other threads saying how IFly is way better now than PMDG.

Edited Tuesday at 04:22 PM1 day by carlanthony24

12 minutes ago, carlanthony24 said:

Enough to be able to be on the flightdeck has well. Have been typed on 320, 321 has crew. Other pilots also disagree with what you say. Crazy how far PMDG is below standard is not the once top tier dev they use to be and you see the Boeing type rated pilots on the other threads saying how IFly is way better now than PMDG.

Interesting, because the rate of climb of iFly is still incorrect, she climbs like a NG.

Edited Tuesday at 04:32 PM1 day by MaximumN2