Jetstream96

You can go to their forum and ask for support: http://talk.pafs.wf/

Now 003 is available. Maybe you can try that.

That's exactly how an Airbus behaves. Large sidestick inputs are usually needed for Airbuses. I am also practicing my flare. lol See how real pilots fly the Airbus: Merry Christmas everyone!

Isn't EFB for those PDFs? lol

Aerosoft. For its Airbus X Extended.

If you want to see the wingtip just go to wing view. I don't understand why this is so important.

Very awesome! I enjoy this plane very much too.

http://forum.aerosof...-key-assigment/ By the way, I think those key assignments are on of my favorite features.

OK. I already reported in Aerosoft forums. Do you mean FLEX thrust? You can manually override that by simply entering a new temperature. What about "some are then getting different N1 settings"? I do not get it.

Anybody experience CTD with this Airbus? My first flight is perfect, but my second, third, and forth flights ended up with CTD during the climb. I don't know whether only a few people have similar issue, or this is a common issue?

I think you mean this one?

FSL Concorde +1

Have you tried to repair FSX before reinstalling. Sometimes the repair works.

What is the difference between FSrealwx lite and the opus? I've been using Active Sky for a long time. Today I tried FSrealwx lite for two flights and I feel it works nearly perfectly. It gives me the weather which matches nicely with metar and the wind is pretty smooth. I only noticed gusty wind transition once. I have to say Active Sky is not a real-time weather program, but what is the reason to go for OpusFsx?

Fantastic shots! The water and ground is very amazing.

Sure they are in fact so strong. Winds in stratosphere can be incredible. Sometimes you can see 200+ knots in some area.

You can enlarge the manual window by dragging it, or you can read that in your PDF viewer.

Not included for now.

Thanks for the info. This one is amazing and even easier to customize.

Although Aerosoft do not model every system, but they completed most of the systems which we simmers will use. (except for TRK/FPA, but I hope they will do it) I don't understand why some people keep asking for something like weather radar, fire simulation, system failures simulation, wing flex, etc. I believe, even developers model every system, 99.99% of simmers cannot operate them properly. PMDG almost get the NGX fully simulated, but who has read through thousands of pages to learn how to fly it? How many people understand the structure of air system? Then why people are expecting developers to make things which they don't know how to use? Sometimes we can think in a more realistic way. Full system simulation is definitely great. However, do we need that?

They've got the TCAS work on IVAO, and they are working this on VATSIM at this time.

I am also waiting here. Once the extended is out, it will be my ONLY aircraft.

I found a video demonstrating FSRaas, which is the free version. I've used it several times and I would say every function works fine for me. I don't know what are implemented in FS2Crew's version, so I can't compare the two. Are those functions listed below all? If so, the only "added" function is the altimeter setting (and maybe the options). I recommend you to try FSRaas and then decide whether to pay 30EUR or not.

That one works nicely. I think that free version is good enough for me, so I will not buy FS2Crew's.

Sorry but it is not about to release in months.