ludekbrno

CPU is very old. Maybe reliable, but very slow. It cause low performance MSFS.

The pilot is responsible for avoiding the terrain in a real life, not ATC 😉 ATC is responsible only for avoiding the other traffic. So you always must use the approach charts for IFR flights.

It simply isn't possible, because with MSFS updates usually comes some changes on server components of MSFS. So it allways must match the MSFS client version with server components version and it is not possible keep many different version of server components live at the same time. Therefore, it is not possible downgrade MSFS only on client side as you want, like this 737MAX add-on, for example.

Hmm, I think, that SU3 performance problem will not be solved. Asobo tells about a biger airports areas, but there are heavy performance problems in a many locations very far from any big airport.

Do you have installed some clearing or "optimizing" software, like CCleaner, Advanced system care, Glary utilities or similar?

If you are flying still in the same small area, the rolling cache can lower utilisation of your SSD. But if usually you are flying in a diverse areas, there isn't any reason to use the rolling cache, because it cache data, what you never use again or only small piece of this.

Yes, we paid so much for it. Three Dollars! 🙂

If you do not fly only still the same small area, you don't need the rolling cache at all. So you can deactivate it.

I was fly B787 no so often, but now i tried it. I set only 25% of fuel and about 70% of payload. I set speed for take-off according to FMC and fly. Take-off was ok, climbing not so quick, as expected, but I reach FL270 as I wants (only short flight). But if I was in approach, I select flaps 25° and 163kt in the FMC for landing. And if I gradually extended the flaps according with the FMC, then the landing gear, the plane was not able to keep the desired speed. It slowed down until the speed was just above the stall and then the stall protection lower the nose and plane was in permanent descend about 1000ft/min. So there wasn't any chance keep the plane in horizontal path even with engines run on 100%. I tried disconnect AP and A/T, but still wasn't possible to stabilize vertical path and reach the G/S and airport. I hit the ground about 2NM before the runway treshold. I think, that ASOBO was disproportionately decreased the engines thrust of the some jetliners (I tried only A320NEO and B787), because there is a very slow climbing of the A320NEO after update too. Is it only my some mistake with plane control or ASOBO disable jetliners for the Christmas? 🙂

I think it's sure, that it will must broke mods. There are too much changes to keep mods working.

Yes, you can make an image of drive before update will come, but if you use this image after update release, in first MSFS start you get update again and MSFS will not start, until you install the update. Updates are mandatory, not choice 😉

Ok, so you can return back to any older sim. Will be scenery better, than MSFS? I think, that many of people rapidly forget, what default scenery we get with every older sims. Yes, I know, that everything isn't perfect, but always you can find some places, which are repesented perfectly in MSFS. I think, that enjoing good places is much better, that crying on places, what aren't perfect yet. With highlights on "yet".

Why are you thinking, that ASOBO refuse this? Couldn't be only because they fix bug in their order and priorities? It's sure, that ASOBO knows about this problem, so we must wait for fix.

All of us knows, that the MSFS jetliners are close to unusable condition in this time yet. It's a shame, but it does not make any sense to fight various bugs and still wait for the monent, when autopilot try to kill you 🙂 . Is much more better to use aircrafts, which are i good development condition and it is possible use it bugless. I believe, that jetliners will be fixed sometime in the future. But I have a lot of fun with smaller planes now.

What exactly is gone? 🙂 Or what do you expect for more? Yes, we all knows, that there are some bugs and jetliners are near to completely missing, but why can't you enjoy the small planes and exploring the whole world with a various weather and light conditions? Maybe you only don't have enough ideas for interesting flights 🙂

The same for me 🙂 . In FSX I was fly 90% of all time with PMDG 737 NG. I miss it in MSFS, but there isn't any way to go back after some flights in unbelievable real weather and light conditions over the fantastic real scenery in MSFS. Now for me TBM930 is the best plane for IFR longer and higher flights (light replacement instead of PMDG737) and Cessna 152 for lower slow flying and enjoing the scenery 🙂 .

Yes, it's just you 🙂 . I miss very much some advanced airliner, but flying with small GA aircraft is not comparable with older sims. It is much many times funner, due scenery, weather. lighting and flight dynamics, than previous sims.

Why are you thinking, that we didn't get this flight model? It has nothing to do with controller sensitivity settings.

Are you sure, that you connect your monitor directly to graphic card output and not to mainboard output? 😉

There are some very important things. Make a clean instalation of Windows 10, upgrade it to the last version and NEVER USE an external cleaners, like CCleaner, Tune Up or similar softwares and NEVER USE an external antiviruses, like Avast, AVG, ESET... only use an integrated Defender. If you will follow this recommendation, you will don't get any problems with instalation of MSFS.

Are you really sure, that do you have set the flight model as "modern" and NOT as "legacy"???

And what rendering scale do you use?

THX very much, I bought Android version and works perfectly for me! 🙂 I have some small idea for improvement. If possible, I would be very happy with some distance measurement. I'm thinking about simple distance indicator between the plane position and finger touch could be a very useful feature. But only if it is technically possible. Thanks! 🙂

Not >100$, only 60$...

Thank you very much for your work! I'm looking forward to an android version. It looks as a very useful product!