nikita

depends on where you'll fly. If you'll fly in Europe, you'll have the most coverage with IVAO. For USA, go to VATSIM. If you'll stay just in England, you might consider VATSIM, they have good coverage there

I haven't seen any difference, it's just another update. But there's something for laptop users: fsx in DX10 mode doesn't find the Nvidia card anymore, only the in-built Intel one, thus i'm getting horrible performance. It was working earlier, don't remember if it was with 306 or 310.

I listen to brony musicians like Glaze, Living Tombstone and Aviators

If you fly in europe, use www.eurofpl.eu/finder It searches for the route and automatically checks the route in the cfmu considering every restriction active in that day. This validator is also used for checking real life airline flight plans, soyou can be sure it's highly realistic

Meigs field, why did they remove it :Cry:

It shoild be this one. Can you upload it on some external hosting website like mediafire?

Hi all, i remember that somebody posted a great excel sheet with tons of various calculations (around 5 pages, including almost everything from takeoff to landing, fuel plan and so on). Sadly i had to format the pc and was unable to backup everything, and now i can't find it anymore. Does somebody still have it in his pc? Or the download link?

So you're asking pmdg to develop a ''fake'' aircraft? I guess you'll wait for a loooong time. Also, where would they take all the datas?

Danny, for viewing ivao online traffic and atc, go to webeye.ivao.aero That's a very simple tool, if you're registered you can use ivae which is like vatspy

Both vatsim and ivao have a official ''flight school'' and lots of ''private'' schools. My personal opinion is that vatsim is quite more professional, but on ivao (they're also professional, don't worry) they're a bit more like a ''family'', especially here in the italian division. I'd suggest to use ivao if you fly in europe, vatsim in the usa

That's not fair!! You're posting real world pics!!! :P

We're not all like this. I'm in high school (16 years old) and i'm that type of guy ''no autopilot below 5000ft ;-)

+1 (i'm 16)

No chances for who's on IVAO? :Waiting:

That's my opinion IMAGE REMOVED

The ngx isn't realistic?? It's like saying water can burn :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: Nice troll by the way

A perfect day for vfr :LMAO:

Yes, i have it. But what i meant were not just airport sceneries, but big area scenery, like New Zealand, Central Rocky Mountains and so. There is the SIRX project but there are no news since may 2011

I think we should wait until we get a simulator done with this graphic engine

An ORBX scenery for Italy.. we don't have anything photorealistic here!!! :Cry:

1) should be possible 2) i highly doubt it. This would mean removing some other animations. I don't mind if it's something really hidden like the equipment hatch, but still, what would it add to realism? 3)you said it, those functions are useless to pilots. It's also forbidden to them to go there 4) as said many times, it's impossible to make a giid wx radar in fsx. The only thing i can think about is a radar that reads actual weather from external programs like active sky 5) i don't know 6) efb may be possible, but what about all the charts???

Awesome pics, not even a single blurry! What tweak did you use?

Who wants to derate her? FULL POWER!!!!!!! :(

the sounds are right for me, and for the feeling, it adds a lot in every situation, again especially for little planes (i have a video on youtube, ''the ultra short landing'', where i attempt a go around but i stall.. And for the first time i experienced a wing stall!). For example i can make way smoother landings now, it ''feels'' better (have to try again without accu-feel, i think it reduced the 737 's tendency to float...)

The best thing would be ezca: you can set all the views you want and assign each one to a hotkey (for example, i have 1 for main view, 2 for overhead, 3 for fmc and so on..)