Dammit! Alright maybe not the best Analogy.Go Tiger !

;) :(

I wish they'd re-open the E.T. I'd join in a heartbeat.I think it would be totally worth it to help the project and team along. Just my opinion.

I wish they'd re-open the E.T. I'd join in a heartbeat.I think it would be totally worth it to help the project and team along. Just my opinion.

I doubt they need more people to test/report issues. What they need is the technical capability to address those issues so as to produce a stable working product for an acceptable majority of mature, not virgin fs9 user installations. It's a hell of a task for a first timer, and they clearly do not have the ability to do it yet.

It's a hell of a task for a first timer, and they clearly do not have the ability to do it yet.

Say's who?

Say's who?

If you sell payware and aren

Even the very simplified version has some serious coding under the hood. "Simply fixing" what's wrong is a much more difficult thing to do than you probably think. That said, they should have done this at least two months ago... But as they said, they are overhauling portions of the code. You know, if that makes the whole thing better, let them do it. Because, if they first start fixing the CTDs and then start overhauling the code, the work they did to cure the CTDs might have been completely worthless.But then again, I didn't buy the thing, so it's not my money that has gone down the drain...

If you sell payware and aren

Say's who?

Says THEM, by their own words, actions and unfinished products.

Then maybe you should wait for the defunct 'Airliner XP' then eh? :( They are still working on this and they are doing it for the likes of you and I Why are some people so bloody negative on here?

'the likes of you and I'??????????? First of all - Speak for yourself, secondly most of us in the real world know that payware devs don't stay in business for 'the likes of you and I', they do it to make a return on investment. Airsimmer is THE most patently obvious example of that with their unprecedented pay to beta ET, then the sudden appearance of a 'Basic' product which was nothing more than a buggy stripped down version of their original product which, again by their own admission, was released for financial reasons.Negative? You don't know the difference between negativity and factual observation.

hi! =) jus my two cents on the matter of Airsimmer and their product.frankly, its THE worst product i ever bought. period. i own alot of addon plane and this is the worst stuff ever.i for once have given up on airsimmer. i bought the plane back in november.. and from the start it was unflyeble.. then they promised us a patch that would fix everything at the end of december.. so i never went for a refund.well, that was my choice.. money isnt the matter here. they can have the money. what really amazes me is they way they conduct their business and customer service toward their PAYING customers.god forbid if u post any form of bad critics against airsimmer or their product. they ban u so fast ur head spin for a week.. trust me i know.. been banned 3 times, and if there is a sound and good thread going, with both good or bad critics in the thread,the allmighty mr Ryan Briggs locks the thread,again so fast ur head spinning, i really believed in airsimmer in the beginning, no doubt , this could be a great add on for FS9, but they really made a mess of it, big time! the product is so full of bugs its unflyeble.. my airbus been grounded since the realease ot the so called patch, and it stays in my hanger,well forever i guess,, cos i cant really see how they gonna fix this...and then nik comes back from the dead and say they run into a small problem with the code.. yea right,why just dont they admit that they are in way over their heads here,and,, what will happend to us poor suckers who believed in air simmer and didnt go for the refund.( again my choice)?how they gonna fix this?will we get the "new" airsimmer for free , cos frankly most of the paying customers are paying beta testers,what really amazes me is; how the hell did this alpha reales even get past the beta test stage????or did Aircammers just go past and realese it even knowing this product suxs?, well thats good business and good for the companys reputation, or not,i used to own my own business and if i was just 10% as much smart &@($* as airsimmer is id loose my clients so fast u wouldnt believe it..they way they behave and run airsimmer is really not good,and just because they running the company and selling over the net dont mean they can behave like this, bad form airsimmer..i will hopefully get the damn thing flying with a patch(or ten,, who knows)but i will NEVER buy anything from airsimmer again. they screwed me over once , not gonna happen again,just my two centscheersoh! btw!i tried out the new QW 757 at a friends place, the latest version. and wow! great plane. easy to fly and looks awesome and the sound is great. straight forward from the QW team,, no promises,, and happy customers,(mostly)learn from those guys airsimmers! how hard can it be?

If they did it merely for the fun of it, they'd release it as freeware. They're making a living out of this. So I think that paying customers have a right to complain when the product falls short of the promises made by the manufacturer. The whole "Extended beta" team must feel so betrayed. I'm really glad I didn't buy it. I'm standing by with my credit card as soon as the advanced model is out and has had it's obligatory initial patches. I'm pretty sure there are a LOT of other simmers who are thinking the same. I hope (but can't bring myself to believe) that the company won't fold before they make it to that point, like Digital Aviation did with their Fokker 70/100.

The whole "Extended beta" team must feel so betrayed.

The whole "Extended beta" team must feel so betrayed.

I know I do....But now I have moved on to FSX and will try to forget about this very bad experience.

I wish they'd re-open the E.T. I'd join in a heartbeat.I think it would be totally worth it to help the project and team along. Just my opinion.

If only you knew how many ET members threw in the towel long long ago and have since put the whole "experience" behind them, you wouldn't be saying this. Hard to say how many have completely removed the software from their systems as I have, but I know a bunch have mentioned it, plus so many are now on FSX only.

like Digital Aviation did with their Fokker 70/100.

Support for the 70/100 is being moved to the Flight1 forums and the VC is not being dropped. :)The 70/100 is still one of my favorite add-ons of all time.

I read (from Florian) that the VC was likley being dropped for the FS9 version.