I was think about getting a 767 add on for FSX but can't decide which one to get. I've narrowed it down to 2 options.The Level-D 767 or the Aerosoft 767 Captain Sim.Could someone please tell me the good and bad points for both. I have a relatively good system so could you mention about the frame rates.Thanks

If you want ultimate realism, all systems working like in the real airplane, buy Level-D. If you don't care about so realistic aircraft, and want simplified but better graphics, get Captain Sim's 767.

level d. great customer support (although so does aerosoft), much more realism and excellent if you have hardware that can be interfaced! Although the captain sim looks more aesthetically pleasing, level d has the realism and systems ;)

I'm thinking about the same thing, and can't decide on which 767 to go for. There's a third option to confuse things, the CLS 767.Several people have said that the Level D doesn't look as good as the CS for example - does anyone have any comparison pics showing them (or even all three)?Thanks,Dave.

I'm thinking about the same thing, and can't decide on which 767 to go for. There's a third option to confuse things, the CLS 767.Several people have said that the Level D doesn't look as good as the CS for example - does anyone have any comparison pics showing them (or even all three)?Thanks,Dave.

Just google CS, QW, and LvLD .. all the sites have screen shots for comparison.... 

Level-D! Have it and the CS757, no comparison. Everything has worked on the 767 since the day I installed it, can't say the same for the 757. Been a pain in the butt and I don't bother with it anymore because it feels like half speed and the sound puts me to sleep. And CLS shouldn't be in the conversation, its a souped up default airplane...

The Level-D was the first add-on aircraft I bought for FSX and despite handing out lots of money since on other aircraft, I remain convinced it has been the best buy all round. As a comparison I have the CS 757 and while it sure looks pretty, I haven't found it as reliable or pleasureable to fly as the level-d. Not that the CS is a bad apple, I just found the level-d easier to fly and with reasonable framerates on my mediocre machine.My flying skills aren't great, but the level-d does everything I need and just works. Its as complex as you want it to be, a great jack of all trades. The VC and 2d panels do the job, some would say that it is perhaps looking a little lack-lustre compared to 'newer' releases, but it is not bad. I'd rather have a good solid performance than an eye-catching jewel which doesn't quite hack its primary purpose, ie fly well. If I had not bought the level-d, my inclination today would probably be the QW 757 package. From what I've seen, it offers lots of models, good performance and pretty looks. Could do worse than download the manuals from your shortlist and get a feel for whats on offer.

There's a third option to confuse things, the CLS 767.Dave.

Actually, there's also a fourth option to confuse things even further: http://www.aerosim.co.jp/eigo/a-product_e/fsx_e/b767300fsx_e/b767300fsx_ss_e.htmBut, that's pretty light on systems, however, as with most of their FSX birds, it can be made fairly good with ISG gauges and some other stuff forced into those cockpit gauge slots. All the Aerosim birds I have get very good FPS and the models are good, but it's pricey considering it is a 'lite' sim.Al

The CLS 767 is definitely the last resort for me. While I do agree with you guys about LVLD's model, the reason why I'm extremely reluctant in using it is all because I have such a weak computer. Yes, I also realize that the Overland 767 is definitely "pants", but it's still worth the disk space since it's very FPS friendly. The CS 767 is such a resource and FPS hog, thanks to its features. Also, the Aerosim 767 will never be a primary choice for me, since the model itself does not have any repaints. Dave.

I'm for Captain Sim's 767. It is rather good after 3 SPs and better then old one from LVLD

Just to add my 2 cents. I would go with the Level-D.Flies very very well and is less of a resource hog than the CS.

If you want to fly it.. Level-D. If you want to look at it.. CS.

If you want to fly it.. Level-D. If you want to look at it.. CS.

the CS aircraft dont fly?

the CS aircraft dont fly?

:( No, seriously... they do fly but are a huge resource hog in comparison to Level-D and really not better in systems simulation. For me, I can fly into EGLL (UK2000) with LVD without problems, all is smooth... if I do it with CS.. well, no so smooth, mildly said.

Another thumbs up for the Level-D 767.