Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

abasa12

The Big "Why Not"?

Recommended Posts

So with a multitude of great developers for FSX, why are some huge, busy, famous and overall great airports being completely overlooked? Europe's mostly got it covered, with a great London, Madrid, Paris, Lisbon, Vienna, Amsterdam and an OK Frankfurt, mostly covered by Aerosoft, and North America is pretty OK, with relatively new NY, LA, DFW, Miami, Chicago and Tampa sceneries being covered by FT and FSDT, however Atlanta could really use a rework. As well, Asia is a totally undeveloped market, only covered slightly by ImagineSim, although their techniques are pretty dated. For example Beijing and Dubai are some of the largest and busiest airports anywhere. As well Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, KL, Taipei and Bangkok have no really good sceneries. Even Sydney, a huge airport and the base for Qantas, has not had a single developer accurately try to represent it. Even Africa, with OR Tambo, Cairo, Nairobi and Lagos has not been ven considered by some of the great developers of today's FSX market. Some other large airports that could really use a redo include Toronto, Moscow, Mexico City, Rio, Sao Paulo, Seoul, Auckland, Islamabad, Istanbul, Rome, Milan and Mumbai. Again these are just suggestions. Any response would be appreciated, so thanks in advance!


Derek MacPherson

At the risk of sounding cliche, I love planes.
GTX 770 / i7-4790K / 16GB DDR3

Boeing777_Banner_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because according to Aerosoft it is literally impossible to get AirSide Access to Airport in Canada/USA, its too bad. O well, FSDT and FlyTampa pull it off.


Ron Hamilton

 

"95% is half the truth, but most of it is lies, but if you read half of what is written, you'll be okay." __ Honey Boo Boo's Mom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recently read in a German magazine, that there are currently THREE (!) developers working on Dubai: A hobby developer (preview here) EvolutionSim (see here) and FlyTampa (couldn't verify that one).

And I agree on the need of redoing Moscow, Milan and Roem airports, though there is quite a good Sheremetyevo for FSX on avsim.ru.

 

Regards

Flo


Florian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, getting access to airside with a camera and or video recorder iin the USA without ending up at Guantanamo Bay is all but impossible these days...


A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So first you complain that there aren't enough developers doing airports, then you bash one of the few developers doing those types of airports, Imaginesim. Who also have done WSSS by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me answer your questions

 

Sydney Airport - it would prove extremely expensive to obtain an aerial image and getting a photoshoot of the airport is like trying to obtain secret documents. We could do it but it wouldn't be worth the money and effort put into it. You would be looking at around $50 at retail price and we would need to sell around 1000 copies before even attempting to break even! It is just the way things are.

 

Asia - easier said than done! Due to many government restrictions in many Asian countries it is next to impossible to get close to the airport with a camera let alone get inside it to take images. The only way we could ever do Dubia, Bangkok (etc) is to have a change in government policy or going on a photo mission by asking pilots and members of staff to take images, which they probably won't want to do.

 

Africa - it is in the process of being done by some developers but doing major airports is extremely uneasy to due the lack of access and more importantly the number of sales. The market research for major African airports suggest that people want major American and European airports more than African ones. It wouldn't be commercially viable.

 

Russia - very difficult to do because of the tight security of the Russian government. The aerial images are not the most expensive for Moscow but it is getting good images of the airport and a photoshoot which is difficult without getting into trouble. The smaller Russian airports are easier to do but no where as easy as doing American and European airfields.

 

Canada - we can do it but we would be paying more for the aerial image than the entire scenery project, that is money developers don't have in these economic times. We are in the process of doing one major Canadian airport but the economics don't add up. When you have purchased the image and completed the project you will need around 1000 sales at the price of $55 to make a decent profit and not many flight simmers will be willing to pay that much for an airport when other companies can make other major airports for more than half that price.

 

 

FlyTampa have done a Hong Kong scenery for FSX, just go to their website.

 

I hope this has helped you with the answers to your questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for Sydney I understand the owners were quite keen on an FSX rendition by Orbx but JV maintains it just isn't economic for them and very much on the back burner. Never-the-less it is a big gap as we have highly detailed Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra (at least how it looked two years ago) airports but not Sydney - I don't regard the only payware version (which I have) as highly detailed.

 

Bruce


Bruce Bartlett

 

Frodo: "I wish none of this had happened." Gandalf: "So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using Google images for a project is forbidden by their EULA. In order to do a project to FSX standards, devs need access to high-res aerial photos, and they're often very hard (if not impossible) to come by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Milano Malpensa was done by Sim Giants some years ago (http://www.sim-giants.com/product.asp?prod=8), but now the company looks out of business, although the product may still be available. There are some quirks, however, for example my RealAir SF-260 sometimes hit invisible obstacles - but nor RealAir nor SimGiants were able to tell me why - other planes have no issues.


LDS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much for all of the replies - makes sense!


Derek MacPherson

At the risk of sounding cliche, I love planes.
GTX 770 / i7-4790K / 16GB DDR3

Boeing777_Banner_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant you go but a ticket or 3 at an airport and take pictures. Maybe cheaper I dont know. Than maybe supliment with google. Just dont tell anyone.


Marc Lynn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    34%
    $8,560.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...