April 13, 201610 yr Just curious which is more compatible with P3D Nvidia or AMD? Or should I say which brand helps P3D perform better or is there really no difference, and in that case it would come down to price.
April 13, 201610 yr With P3D v2 the consensus seemed to be that It preferred Nvidia cards. Not so sure about v3 though. Shanan ASUS Z170 PRO, I7 6700K @ 4.85ghz (HT ON), ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 1080TI GTX (OC), 16 GB DDR4 G.SKILL TRIDENTZ RGB @ 3230MHZ CL 16-17-17-33 (OC) 4X SSDS : WIN 10 (NVME 960 EVO) + P3D + OTHER GAMES, 2X WD BLACKS RAID 0 + 1 SEAGATE BARRACUDA, CORSAIR AX860i PSU, CORSAIR 760T CASE (BLACK), 27 INCH IPS PREDATOR GSYNC 165HZ 1440p + 24 INCH IPS DELL 1080p, THRUSTMASTER HOTAS FCS THROTTLE + FCS16000M CORSAIR K95 RGB + CORSAIR M65 RGB + CORSAIR MM800 POLARIS RGB, CORSAIR H115i v2, CREATIVE GIGAWORKS 7.1 + ASUS D2X XONAR
April 13, 201610 yr Just curious which is more compatible with P3D Nvidia or AMD? Or should I say which brand helps P3D perform better or is there really no difference, and in that case it would come down to price. Just simple Nvidia... actually for the FS series it has always been Nvidia. André
April 13, 201610 yr I'm always hearing Nvidia, and it is all have experience with. 980ti runs p3d3.2 incredibly well. <p>Dassault Falcon, Lear, Embraer and Challenger and Cessna Mechanic.Broadcasting live from former Soviet Missile Silo.Rhys Legge
April 13, 201610 yr anyone used the amd r9 390 8gig of ram sounds great for prep3d v3 I have a 970 and struggle in heavy weather, heavy scenary on a triple monitor setup. Colin hodds I7 9700K,nvidia 3090 ,ssd ,32gig 3200mhz ram ,win10,prep3d
April 13, 201610 yr Prior to FSX I always found ATI better ( just my experience ) but for FSX & P3D I have found Nvidia works best. Pete Richards I've owned every version of flight simulator since Flight Simulator 3.0 in 1988. Windows 11 Pro loaded on a 4TB Gen5 Crucial T700 SSD, 4TB Samsung 990 Pro SSD, Ryzen 9 7950x3d, AS Rock X670e Taichi Motherboard, Gigabyte Gaming RTX 4090 OC 24GB, 64GB (2x32GB) Viper Venom DDR5-6000MT/s, MSI 32" MAG 321UPX QD-OLED 260hz 4K Gaming Monitor.
April 13, 201610 yr I had both, and i can vouch that nvidia is better for flight simming...and in average for other games also, with similar cards of course...except for dx12, but thats another discution Marques Ryzen 7 [email protected] | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360| RTX 4070 ti | 32GB Ram @5600MHZ| Crucial MX 200 M.2 500GB |Crucial MX200 SATA 500GB | HTC Vive | XIAOMI 43" 4k TV | Acer Predator 27" G-Sync | AOC 32" Freesync
April 13, 201610 yr After several Nvidia boards over the years, including Titan, I decided to switch to the AMD R9 390 with 8 gig of ram. I am well pleased with it and for the price, it's amazing. For me from now, it's going to be AMD as my 1st choice. Phil
April 13, 201610 yr Moderator I concur, nVidia is the way to go. I've always used EGVA branded cards with nVidia chips and have never had an issue. Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator
April 14, 201610 yr Author I don't mind getting 3 nvidia cards but trying to do a 3 monitor setup someone told me that 3 AMD R9 cards do better in a 3 monitor setup is that true? Nvidia is the Gold standard for flight simming. That is what I had gathered so far.
April 14, 201610 yr After several Nvidia boards over the years, including Titan, I decided to switch to the AMD R9 390 with 8 gig of ram. I am well pleased with it and for the price, it's amazing. For me from now, it's going to be AMD as my 1st choice. Phil Interesting I was wondering this only negative twice the power consumption of a g t x 970 Colin hodds I7 9700K,nvidia 3090 ,ssd ,32gig 3200mhz ram ,win10,prep3d
Create an account or sign in to comment