May 11, 20179 yr Just watched the DTG Twitch Stream about FSW. They said 7 aircraft are included, i noted 6. Is no. 7 a surprise or did i missed one? Piper PA-18 "Cub" Piper PA-28 "Cherokee" Piper PA-34 "Seneca" Piper PA-46 "Malibu Mirage" Diamond DA40 "Star" Diamond DA42 "TwinStar" Added: Van`s RV-7A Planes looking great, Windshield effects great, shadows smooth. But environment still looks like FSX. Popping autogen/textures, blurries, stutters. But in the chat Aimee said they have graphic improvement for the ground on the list. Overall i see a big improvement over Flight School, but still a lot to do.I`m not yet impressed, but there is hope again :)
May 11, 20179 yr So, is your glass half full or half empty? AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 4.2 32 gig ram, Nvidia RTX3060 12 gig, Intel 760 SSD M2 NVMe 512 gig, M2NVMe 1Tbt (OS) M2NVMe 2Tbt (MSFS) Crucial MX500 SSD (Backup OS). VR Oculus Quest 2 Windows 11 25H2 YouTube:- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC96wsF3D_h5GzNNJnuDH3WQ 2k+ Videos & Streams BATC and FSFO FB Group:- https://www.facebook.com/groups/1571953959750565 Flight Sim First Officer (FSFOv6) and SoFly Beta Tester Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation!
May 11, 20179 yr It is beyond me why they focused on aircraft, rather than on overall environment. Rain effect and wiggly gauges, but the same old land class issues leftover from FS9. They clearly have not listened to the community. Most of what is said on the Internet may be the same thing they shovel on the regular basis at the local barn.
May 11, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, Silicus said: It is beyond me why they focused on aircraft, rather than on overall environment. Rain effect and wiggly gauges, but the same old land class issues leftover from FS9. They clearly have not listened to the community. Nonsense, ofcourse they have listened to the community This early access sim looks very promising. I for one am going to approach this very positive. Cheers, Bert AMD Ryzen 5900X, 32 GB RAM, RTX 3080 Ti, Windows 11 Home 64 bit, MSFS 2024
May 11, 20179 yr Author 5 minutes ago, Marco Van Dam said: What about cloud shadows in FSW? They said it`s in development
May 11, 20179 yr All piston prop, no turboprops? I guess they can build on that later, but it feels like a narrow focus. Also the list looks like it's driven by licensing deals, so they may be leaning pretty hard on an "official version" marketing angle. That might work if it includes input, flight testing, etc. from the respective aircraft manufacturers. X-Plane and Microsoft Flight Simulator on Windows 10 i7 6700 4.0 GHz, 32 GB RAM, GTX 1660 ti, 1920x1200 monitor
May 11, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, Silicus said: It is beyond me why they focused on aircraft, rather than on overall environment. Rain effect and wiggly gauges, but the same old land class issues leftover from FS9. They clearly have not listened to the community. My guess being it was easier to introduce some GA planes, especially if made by known FSX/P3D developers, than get to the features that really requires a lot of work (autogen popping for example, blurries etc etc). Chock 1.1: "The only thing that whines louder than a jet engine is a flight simmer."
May 11, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, Rimshot said: Nonsense, ofcourse they have listened to the community This early access sim looks very promising. I for one am going to approach this very positive. 1 Same here I am positive, Let's not forget history here, how FSX or P3D looked back then. Asus Rampage VI Extreme Encore(water Cooled) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Hybrid, 64 DD4 @ 2800 2 x 2x M.2 in raid 0.
May 11, 20179 yr I hope they completely overhaul the lighting engine, its about time we had real lights that actually light things up, instead of bright colored textures that don't actually do anything. Lian Li 011 Air Mini | AMD 9800X3D | Asus ROG STRIX B650E-F | Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 280mm RGB | 2x32GB G.Skill DDR5-6000 | ASUS TUF RTX 5090 | Seasonic Prime Platinum 1000W | Pimax Crystal Light
May 12, 20179 yr 51 minutes ago, Pilot53 said: I hope they completely overhaul the lighting engine, its about time we had real lights that actually light things up, instead of bright colored textures that don't actually do anything. That's definitely not in this first release. There is PBR though that helps with reflections and better representation of lighting on the airplanes.
May 12, 20179 yr 2 hours ago, Paraffin said: All piston prop, no turboprops? In my opinion, it is pointless asking for turboprops and/or liners in the stock hangar of a product that will be launched at $/€ 25. This would be completely unrealistic. Complex aircraft are third party work.
May 12, 20179 yr 6 hours ago, angeli662 said: Same here I am positive, Let's not forget history here, how FSX or P3D looked back then. Ill join the positive gang too , i had only been around since fs95 and anything newer ill be willing to support too ... Image removed as image is no longer available.
May 12, 20179 yr I just watched the stream. I thought it looks good and some of the future development sounds very promising. I had to laugh during the stream when everyone was being derogatory and stupid in chat and then Cryss says " type !May18 for a free copy" everyone suddenly wanted a free copy
May 12, 20179 yr I have not seen the stream yet, but will also join the "positive gang". As I stated elsewhere on this forum, I hope that FSW is a success and becomes a worthy replacement for FSX. Early days yet. Douglas Ulyate
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.