Take note, this sim is not ready for flying airliners.

[Chock 17,769]

I suggest that they change the name of active pause to 'engage insane behaviour pause' 🤣

[devgrp 1,233]

1 hour ago, Colonel X said:

It's just that some people either do not recognise these stutters, or they ignore them.

 

Well, you're arguably running one of the best systems money can buy these days. Of course you get high performance. You're still getting the same stutters as everyone else. 

How do you know he's getting stutters? I'm not getting any and I'm running 4k on high settings 

 

 

 

 

[Slides 1,552]

2 hours ago, Boby said:

Its not meant for hardcore simmers. Its meant for console players using a joypad shouting: "look mom, im a real pilot" while they loop a 747. 

Want to have proper physics and navigation, go DCS

 

I love DCS but proper navigation and DCS are not something that I would use in the same sentence. Systems depth is amazing of course

Also if you REALLY want proper edge case aerodynamics, try the latest version of IL2.

[Slides 1,552]

2 hours ago, Colonel X said:

Sure. It never even came close to filling my 16GB (11GB at most). Also VRAM is usually utilized less than 50%.

That's not how memory utilization works. The more RAM you have, the more aggressive Windows and apps will be to allocate memory

[WestAir 2,522]

2 hours ago, Boby said:

Its not meant for hardcore simmers. Its meant for console players using a joypad shouting: "look mom, im a real pilot" while they loop a 747. 

Want to have proper physics and navigation, go DCS

 

I don't even think you can loop the 747 in this. I think the ailerons lose authority once you knife-edge, and you just nose over and overstress the airframe / end the simulation. The bare bones aerodynamics in the default aircraft are still beyond the fidelity of other sims.

[Lotharen 287]

23 minutes ago, Chock said:

I suggest that they change the name of active pause to 'engage insane behaviour pause' 🤣

Lol, also wheres that video you promised? 😁

[virtualstuff 758]

14 minutes ago, Slides said:

I love DCS but proper navigation and DCS are not something that I would use in the same sentence. Systems depth is amazing of course

Also if you REALLY want proper edge case aerodynamics, try the latest version of IL2.

Exactly however I love the F-14 🙂

[Chock 17,769]

5 minutes ago, Lotharen said:

Lol, also wheres that video you promised? 😁

On the way, good things take time. I'm not one of those 'bang it out quick to ensure hits on youtube before anyone else, and screw the quality' kind of guys.

[z06z33 763]

33 minutes ago, Lange_666 said:

I'm with Colonel X on this.

I had some high hopes when seeing the pre-release video's, but then my hopes took a hugh dive seeing the YT video's of people over the last 2 days. They all have stutter, and most have a lot.

So this morning after some hassle to get the download working, i got a return from the sim that i had a medium system (fair enough): i7 4470K @4,5, GTX180ti, 32GB 2400 Ram, 2560x1440 G-Sync monitor, a few SSD's, 300MBit Internet (rest of the hardware is not that important).

After running the setting where set to overall medium, i had a little run, performance was imho just terrible. Lot's of stutter, big and small. Looked for a way to get at least the FPS to display, went into developer modus and got the ingame data to display.

First thing i noticed was the 100% load on the CPU, everytime it hit the 100%, the FPS figure took a dive. So i played around with the settings a bit:

Game setting LOW: Cessna 152: still stutters but FPS hits 60 here and there but is not very constant. RAM used: 8-9 GB !!! (out of 32GB), VRAM used, 2.5!! (out of 11GB).

On this setting i then lowered the FPS cap to 30. FPS was more constant but even then, still stuttering, short and long but overall a bit smoother. Even less RAM and VRAM was used.

Game setting: ULTRA: Cessna 152: FPS can barely make it to 20, lots of stutter, long and short, not playable at all. But... RAM use: 13GB out of 32, VRAM use: 8 out of 11 available. CPU hits 100% almost constantly.

 

I wonder: what people with a low end system do?

And oh, i also run DCS, smooth as butter, same res, mix of medium and high settings overall, FPS there is +/- 90 on average.

I'm overall highly dissapointed in the performance, even at everything at low settings (the only thing i'm happy for is that i changed the deluxe pro into a standard, for the moment this sim is wasted money in my eyes)

 

PS: Colonel X: i feel your pain.

Odd having no issues with my laptop  I7-7700HQ at 3.2ghz (laptop CPU so way less performance than your 4790K) 32GB ram and GTX1070 with 8GB Vram

[ttbq1 347]

Guys, today for the first time I saw while flying above NYC my RAM usage reaching 19GB and my 1080TI VRAM almost 10.2GB...my i7 9700k at 70%-80% usage and the FPS Locked at 30 with RTSS Scanline/2. At 80% 4K resolution. The rest on ultra except couple of things (reflections med, no bloom, tress and building at high).

Not a single stutter flying the bonanza for about 35 mins..I was happy.

Now, having said that, my experience on the airliners is not that good. It was expected, that’s why I still have my P3DV5 on the other SSD.

Edited August 18, 2020 by ttbq1

[wim123 761]

38 minutes ago, Lange_666 said:

I'm with Colonel X on this.

I had some high hopes when seeing the pre-release video's, but then my hopes took a hugh dive seeing the YT video's of people over the last 2 days. They all have stutter, and most have a lot.

So this morning after some hassle to get the download working, i got a return from the sim that i had a medium system (fair enough): i7 4470K @4,5, GTX180ti, 32GB 2400 Ram, 2560x1440 G-Sync monitor, a few SSD's, 300MBit Internet (rest of the hardware is not that important).

After running the setting where set to overall medium, i had a little run, performance was imho just terrible. Lot's of stutter, big and small. Looked for a way to get at least the FPS to display, went into developer modus and got the ingame data to display.

First thing i noticed was the 100% load on the CPU, everytime it hit the 100%, the FPS figure took a dive. So i played around with the settings a bit:

Game setting LOW: Cessna 152: still stutters but FPS hits 60 here and there but is not very constant. RAM used: 8-9 GB !!! (out of 32GB), VRAM used, 2.5!! (out of 11GB).

On this setting i then lowered the FPS cap to 30. FPS was more constant but even then, still stuttering, short and long but overall a bit smoother. Even less RAM and VRAM was used.

Game setting: ULTRA: Cessna 152: FPS can barely make it to 20, lots of stutter, long and short, not playable at all. But... RAM use: 13GB out of 32, VRAM use: 8 out of 11 available. CPU hits 100% almost constantly.

 

I wonder: what people with a low end system do?

 

 

PS: Colonel X: i feel your pain.

i am on  a below spec machine and i am very very happy with the performance. perfect for bushflying.

its way way better than i expected.

[Lotharen 287]

I can't wait to test it out after I get home home from work. 

[BIGSKY 316]

I got rid of the flight plan way points,and went GPS direct,I just flew around RJAA Tokyo,in and out of the clouds and shot the ILS to 16R on Ultra,my frames are now 30 in VC and 60 exterior.

[hangar 661]

10 minutes ago, BIGSKY said:

I got rid of the flight plan way points,and went GPS direct,I just flew around RJAA Tokyo,in and out of the clouds and shot the ILS to 16R on Ultra,my frames are now 30 in VC and 60 exterior.

 

You're welcome 🙂

[BIGSKY 316]

4 minutes ago, hangar said:

 

You're welcome 🙂

Looks like a 3090ti is in my future...