March 3, 20215 yr 2080ti, i9-9900K, 32GB Ram I see people complaining about FPS but I don't see how unless they are on a lower end system...and what did you expect? MS put out the minimum, recommended and ideal specs before launch. I only fly VR now so have had to lower the settings a bit to medium...but medium in VR kicks word not allowed on ultra high settings with a monitor anyday so I don't care. 🙂
March 3, 20215 yr Author 1 minute ago, flightsimJim said: 2080ti, i9-9900K, 32GB Ram I see people complaining about FPS but I don't see how unless they are on a lower end system...and what did they expect? MS put out the minimum, recommended and ideal specs before launch. I only fly VR now so have had to lower the settings a bit to medium...but medium in VR kicks word not allowed on ultra high settings with a monitor anyday so I don't care. 🙂 Why can't you edit posts...at least for 5 minutes? Oh well its your database space...now you are going to get useless posts like this reposting edits.
March 3, 20215 yr OK. Thanks for your contribution. Edited March 3, 20215 yr by bobcat999 Rob (but call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind). I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio. Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's. Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.
March 3, 20215 yr 9 minutes ago, flightsimJim said: 2080ti, i9-9900K, 32GB Ram I see people complaining about FPS but I don't see how unless they are on a lower end system...and what did you expect? MS put out the minimum, recommended and ideal specs before launch. I only fly VR now so have had to lower the settings a bit to medium...but medium in VR kicks word not allowed on ultra high settings with a monitor anyday so I don't care. 🙂 Any prove for this? Intel i9-13900K | Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master | RTX4090 | 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 | Be quiet! Pure Loop 2 FX AiO | Win 11
March 3, 20215 yr 13 minutes ago, ThomseN_inc said: Any prove for this? Probably none whatsoever. That I can imagine anyway. It’s like me saying I have had my 911 to 190mph today no problems, so why do I need a Lamborghini. So there 🤪
March 3, 20215 yr External FPS tools sometimes show way more FPS then the actual in-sim dev mode FPS counter. I'm skeptical that anyone can get 100fps on the dev mode counter under any circumstances, you'd be Limited By Mainthread way before that. AMD 3950X | 64GB RAM | AMD 5700XT | CH Fighterstick / Pro Throttle / Pro Pedals
March 3, 20215 yr 1 hour ago, flightsimJim said: 2080ti, i9-9900K, 32GB Ram I see people complaining about FPS but I don't see how unless they are on a lower end system...and what did you expect? MS put out the minimum, recommended and ideal specs before launch. I only fly VR now so have had to lower the settings a bit to medium...but medium in VR kicks word not allowed on ultra high settings with a monitor anyday so I don't care. 🙂 You cant have both ultra high settings when on medium at the same time. Do you meen ultra resolution like 4K? And medium settings. Michael Moe Michael Moe
March 3, 20215 yr I think he is saying when he runs his VR setup at medium it looks a lot better than ultra on a monitor. 60-100 on ultra sounds like a joke though. Maybe in rural areas. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
March 3, 20215 yr 26 minutes ago, ryanbatcund said: I think he is saying when he runs his VR setup at medium it looks a lot better than ultra on a monitor. He must be in need of glasses then. No way does VR look anything like ultra at 4k.
March 3, 20215 yr Personally I see no need for 60-100 FPS. I have MSFS set to a 30 FPS limit and it runs smooth as silk at ultra settings, everywhere. Using a higher setting makes no discernible difference.
March 3, 20215 yr 15 minutes ago, cobalt said: Personally I see no need for 60-100 FPS. I have MSFS set to a 30 FPS limit and it runs smooth as silk at ultra settings, everywhere. Using a higher setting makes no discernible difference. The difference between 30- 60 and 90 FPS in a sim (at least to me) is massive. I learned that in the X-plane days, and especially so using vulkan.
March 3, 20215 yr 16 minutes ago, Ianrivaldosmith said: The difference between 30- 60 and 90 FPS in a sim (at least to me) is massive. I learned that in the X-plane days, and especially so using vulkan. The REAL difference between 30 and 90FPS is bragging rights LOL 30FPS using ultra settings for me is much more than acceptable and I really do not see getting 90FPS using lesser settings as a viable alternative. However, each of us know what we like and when we like it. Chasing the ultimate will always be the real goal of some and who is justified in denigrating that approach. I just love my simming, but am not really appreciating the work involved in fixing the updates that fix previous updates in MSFS. The end result is brilliant however (if the problem goes away until the next update) Why are so many people chasing the latest updates? LOL Tony Tony Chilcott. My System. Motherboard. ASRock Taichi X570 CPU Ryzen 9 3900x (not yet overclocked). RAM 32gb Corsair Vengeance (2x16) 3200mhz. 1 x Gigabyte Aorus GTX1080ti Extreme and a 1200watt PSU. 1 x 1tb SSD 3 x 240BG SSD and 4 x 2TB HDD OS Win 10 Pro 64bit. Simulators ... FS2004/P3Dv4.5/Xplane.DCS/Aeroflyfs2...MSFS to come for sure.
March 3, 20215 yr 3 hours ago, Ianrivaldosmith said: It’s like me saying I have had my 911 to 190mph today no problems, so why do I need a Lamborghini. So there 🤪 Hmm ... well here is one doing 8.44 169mph ... no launch control here
March 3, 20215 yr 3 hours ago, flightsimJim said: 2080ti, i9-9900K, 32GB Ram I see people complaining about FPS but I don't see how unless they are on a lower end system...and what did you expect? MS put out the minimum, recommended and ideal specs before launch. I only fly VR now so have had to lower the settings a bit to medium...but medium in VR kicks word not allowed on ultra high settings with a monitor anyday so I don't care. 🙂 YES R5 3600 - GTX 1070OC - 32GB 3200 - NVME - 3440x1440 160Hz - VR(Quest 2) GarbagePoster™
March 4, 20215 yr 3 hours ago, Ianrivaldosmith said: The difference between 30- 60 and 90 FPS in a sim (at least to me) is massive. I learned that in the X-plane days, and especially so using vulkan. so what have you found is the optimum FPS # ? Aside from 'higher is better' is there some sweet spot beyond where it becomes diminishing returns? SAR Pilot. Flight Sim'ing since the beginning.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.