3 hours ago, jarmstro said:

Was the new lighting model included in the patch?. Quite why you found it so annoying I know not.

Aww, how innocent 😇.

What would happen if I went to the MSFS forum when a new world update is out and ask: "Hi guys, does this update include replay, a particle system and the ability to set exact RVR?" 😆

52 minutes ago, Janov said:

What would happen if I went to the MSFS forum when a new world update is out and ask: "Hi guys, does this update include replay, a particle system and the ability to set exact RVR?" 😆

 

People would tell you what is included and what is not included and what a fail this is. Particle system btw is coming soon from what I hear.

People would probably NOT tell you how a real simulator doesn't need this and that and how this and that are only important for gaming kiddies - and how your expectations are entitled and you shouldn't be asking anything from the super sympa Garage Band software vendor because he is already doing aLL hE cAN!!!!

3 hours ago, GoranM said:

Can we just drop it and move on?

Fine by me.

1 hour ago, rka said:

Particle system btw is coming soon from what I hear.

Is it coming to scenery art assets too? Or are we mostly talking about stuff like contrails?

Particle System and FMOD for scenery is something that i'm eagerly waiting for in any platform, Xplane is allegedly doing that for their next-gen, but I hope MSFS get this too so we can have more alive and reactive scenery.

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by akita

I dont know how me using xplane makes me or anyone a word not allowed, I have my reasons for not using MSFS same reason I refuse to by apple.

 

Hm now my post is nonsense, maybe i shouldnt bother

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by mjrhealth

2 hours ago, rka said:

People would tell you what is included and what is not included and what a fail this is.

Maybe.

But most likely some folks would also burst a vessel and call me all sorts of names 🙄 - and rightfully so in this case, because I totally well know that the stuff I would be asking about is not included and I just asked them to *** people off.

8 hours ago, FlyBaby said:

Just an example of how you look to bring MSFS (be it comparison or otherwise) into the conversation...then sit back and blame others for debates about XP vs MSFS that leads to closed threads.

Dude, it was jarmstro who (as usually) brought MSFS into the conversation in page 2 of the thread!

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by Murmur

52 minutes ago, Murmur said:

Dude, it was jarmstro who (as usually) brought MSFS into the conversation in page 2 of the 

 

Does it matter?

 

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by jarmstro

26 minutes ago, jarmstro said:

 

Does it matter?

 

You brought up MSFS in a thread about a flight sim releasing a patch that didn't break something important,

Flybaby just can't tolerate that sort of thing.

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by mSparks

Alright, lets all try to get back to the original subject of this thread, shall we?

11.55r2 is the second beta for 11.55 which was described in detail here:

https://developer.x-plane.com/2021/06/crash-fixing-airports-photometric-lighting/

As Ben Supnik detailed, the main objective of 11.55 was to fix a lingering crash bug. Secondary objective was adding the latest Gateway airports. This did not completely work right in 11.55r1 (for example a lot of labels were "2D" instead of "3D" in the airport GUI), so a second beta was released to fix this.

Ben also talks about the new lighting and I think he made it pretty clear that it is not part of 11.55...and won´t be part of V11 at all.

Cheers, Jan

 

12 hours ago, mSparks said:

can bring p3d, dcs, war thunder and ace combat 7 into the conversion to.

Unlike MSFS, XP and Laminar aint got nothing to be afraid of from any of them.

But only MSFS is pretending to be something it isnt (a serious sim for serious aviators with serious money to spend - starting at $1000 just for exactly the same copy of xp11 you have installed)

Hey...My point is that if threads are closed due to debates....why are the XP gatekeepers constantly bring up MSFS in XP threads to start debates???

I am fine with coming into an XP thread, discussing XP only and not bothering to debate about the competition.

2 hours ago, Janov said:

and won´t be part of V11 at all.

where and how did you take away that message?

3 minutes ago, FlyBaby said:

I am fine with coming into an XP thread, discussing XP only and not bothering to debate about the competition.

Excellent, I look forward to it. Just don't expect anyone else to be so narrowly focused. Flightsim spans a few genres, and XP has a lot of all of them.

Edited June 28, 20214 yr by mSparks

4 hours ago, Murmur said:

Dude, it was jarmstro who (as usually) brought MSFS into the conversation in page 2 of the thread!

Actually it was @Janov (another XP gatekeeper) on page 1, you actually like that post. Not hard to fact check...

But it is typical for you to shift blame when someone shows that you tried to add fuel to the fire. Nice try...

 

10 minutes ago, FlyBaby said:

Actually it was @Janov (another XP gatekeeper) on page 1, you actually like that post. Not hard to fact check...

But it is typical for you to shift blame when someone shows that you tried to add fuel to the fire. Nice try...

 

Let's fly over the overt and constant trolling by jarmstro, in any case it wasn't me who brought up MSFS in this thread. I replied to jarmstro and his mentioning of MSFS.

2 hours ago, Janov said:

Ben also talks about the new lighting and I think he made it pretty clear that it is not part of 11.55...and won´t be part of V11 at all.

Where does Ben say that? All he says is that it's too soon to give a date. I can't see any reason why it can't be patched into 11.55 when it's ready? He makes no mention of XP12. (Seems like my question wasn't so ridiculous after all.)