When I had KMCO in FSX performance was fantastic and great  The developer has to fix this or he will loose plenty of sales!!!.I will never buy this product until he gets the pg issue fixed.

 

 

21 hours ago, Mace said:

scenery designers have to eat, too

if they made a decent scenery alot of people would buy it , and they would eat very well.

however churn out some half baked junk, that they have here  that no ones buys then yes, they will go hungry.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, fluffyflops said:

if they made a decent scenery alot of people would buy it , and they would eat very well.

however churn out some half baked junk, that they have here  that no ones buys then yes, they will go hungry.

The quality or lack thereof is not what I was commenting on.

just curious, any body bought KMCO ??

41 minutes ago, Sunshine13 said:

just curious, any body bought KMCO ??

Nobody I know has purchased it yet but someone finally made a video on it if you want to see the details. 

I watched the video, spend so much time showing the interiors, and then  u have to stay away from those taxi way bridges that have to be fixed, its just so tempting to buy, I had KMCO with FSX and it worked fine  I think its best to just hold off till we get some comments and reviews.  Its just so tempting!!  Thanks Wise87 for sharing the  video.

made a 360 u turn and instead bought CYYC, Calgary, Orlando will just have to wait!!   Fix those bridges!!

On 6/1/2023 at 5:39 PM, micstatic said:

I don’t agree with this at all. With the mods that were readily available in p3d, I was still able to enjoy mco and tpa up until the time I dumped p3d for msfs. 

Same - I can't say I flew to either airport often, but I would put them in the "decent performers" category with P3D. By the time I left that sim, no airport was a *stellar* performer.

I am with everyone else though - I'd love to buy this, but the PG is a no-go. I'd probably only want to fly into MCO to enjoy the beautiful PG 🙂

8 hours ago, Wise87 said:

Nobody I know has purchased it yet but someone finally made a video on it if you want to see the details. 

Oh well it's not *that* bad with the bridges. Just a slight hickup while moving over and flickering. Sure this should not exist, but I thought it was literally unsuable or visually unbearable from the comments.

Still way too overpriced for me.

Having seen that video I'm actually quite impressed with it. The bridges issue doesn't look disastrous for my purposes and the modelling generally looks great. Still top end pricing, so I'll hesitate still, but knowing me I'll probably weaken in the end. I do like a nice terminal interior. Although at this price I would like to see it populated, ideally with animated folk.

Still waiting for version 1.1 to release with the PG and other issues resolved. He said of FB that it will take "some days". I call you know what on that and it will likely turn into "some weeks". Ridiculous.

On 5/31/2023 at 11:45 AM, andy1252 said:

Agreed. 30 USD and you have to turn PG off? How did this make it out the door?

Shame, as it almost looks ok otherwise (if a little overpriced)

I agree, it's ridiculous. Having said that, I have had issues with airports, in particular with an Orbx release, where there were trees on the main taxiway! When I contacted the dev I was told that it is OK with PG turned on! I explained that I don't fly with PG turned on and therefore the product is of no use to me. I got a refund, but not after several emails. I was amazed at their stance. I have also experienced the same with Sydney cityscape, where a section of the bridge was misisng, once again, I was told it works with PG turned on. Now we have a dev telling us that the airport only works correctly with PG turned off. Crazy 

Edited June 5, 20233 yr by Rockliffe

33 minutes ago, Rockliffe said:

I agree, it's ridiculous. Having said that, I have had issues with airports, in particular with an Orbx release, where there were trees on the main taxiway! When I contacted the dev I was told that it is OK with PG turned on! I explained that I don't fly with PG turned on and therefore the product is of no use to me. I got a refund, but not after several emails. I was amazed at their stance. I have also experienced the same with Sydney cityscape, where a section of the bridge was misisng, once again, I was told it works with PG turned on. Now we have a dev telling us that the airport only works correctly with PG turned off. Crazy 

It‘s not the whole airport, it‘s one or two bridges, and they are actually working, it‘s just that your plane will take a little jump when going over them (with crashes enabled you might crash your airplane) and they are flickering. Annoying enough, but the airport itself is working.

1 hour ago, Fiorentoni said:

It‘s not the whole airport, it‘s one or two bridges, and they are actually working, it‘s just that your plane will take a little jump when going over them (with crashes enabled you might crash your airplane) and they are flickering. Annoying enough, but the airport itself is working.

Indeed, but why should I pay for any product that is not 100% functional? and only discover the fact after I have paid for it!

1 hour ago, Rockliffe said:

Indeed, but why should I pay for any product that is not 100% functional? and only discover the fact after I have paid for it!

I didn't say you should pay? You said the airport wasn't working, so I was just putting it into context.