I see.  Well, since I never interact with circuit breakers and always interact w/ an interactive checklist, I'll happily ignore the VALUE for me, for circuit breaker implementation. 

Thanks, and Cheers

On 3/20/2024 at 6:19 AM, Vali said:

If they nail the engine sounds for the Fokker F70&F100, I am sold 🙂 (of course not only :D)

Engine sounds are unfortunately one of the greatest general disappointments of the sim.

On 3/20/2024 at 6:19 AM, Noel said:

I bought it for P3D and flew it regularly and IMO the main reason this bird was looked at so favorably, then, had far more to do with its performance profile relative to the rest of the flock, and P3D needed all the help it could get in that regard.  That is no longer an issue at all w/ this type of bird for MSFS/MSFS2024 and TBH in terms of complexity in fidelity it's dwarfed by so many other planes.  I never liked Majestic as a company. That they've taken this long to release a previously well-developed model as the Crash 8 was is hard to fathom.  The resident troll on their forum who went by "SNAVE", which I thought was clearly a portmanteau for, "Snotty Nave", contributed to my negative attitude for Majestic, who clearly tolerated the troll.

I don't understand this criticism...

Are you complaining that a highly regarded "super" High Fidelity add-on is somehow redundant?

There isn't anything comparable presently available in MSFS, and it's a gap that needs filling.

In terms of why they (and FS Labs) aren't here yet, I agree. It's puzzling to the degree Im concerned for their future.

Perhaps their commercial contracts are too consuming/profitable. But that situation will change as MSFS continues it's advancement...

On 3/20/2024 at 8:00 AM, DavidP said:

Frankly, I see them going the way of Level-D.

Their ongoing secrecy and the flat out refusal to give any indication on where they are at, their future plans etc. means users will lose interest given other high-end options are available.

It would seem we can add Quality Wings to that list, too. 😔

9 hours ago, jon b said:

A lot of these new aircraft will be too late for me as my flight simulation season is drawing to a close now spring is here, time to get the motorbikes out instead.

"...season..."????

Night Time is Flight Time 😁

3 hours ago, UrgentSiesta said:

I don't understand this criticism...

Are you complaining that a highly regarded "super" High Fidelity add-on is somehow redundant?

There isn't anything comparable presently available in MSFS, and it's a gap that needs filling.

In terms of why they (and FS Labs) aren't here yet, I agree. It's puzzling to the degree Im concerned for their future.

Perhaps their commercial contracts are too consuming/profitable. But that situation will change as MSFS continues it's advancement...

Nope, nothing about redundant.  My criticism is just an expression of my experience while owning the plane and using the forum.   We have folks like Virtuali who is a one-man show and I would say converting GSX to MSFS would be every bit as challenging as Q400 to MSFS.  Who knows why they have been so lukewarm sounding ever since pre MSFS.

5 hours ago, UrgentSiesta said:

I don't understand this criticism...

Are you complaining that a highly regarded "super" High Fidelity add-on is somehow redundant?

There isn't anything comparable presently available in MSFS, and it's a gap that needs filling.

In terms of why they (and FS Labs) aren't here yet, I agree. It's puzzling to the degree Im concerned for their future.

Perhaps their commercial contracts are too consuming/profitable. But that situation will change as MSFS continues it's advancement...

The pricing is going to be a major factor since well Fenix is cheaper than most high fidelity products if not is the cheapest of them all? If they want to release the A321 at $39.99/£40 doubt it will be this price but I'm going to guess region of £50+ I doubt it will sell well.

On 3/20/2024 at 2:03 PM, ndflieger said:

There's also the Just Flight A300B4

https://www.justflight.com/in-development/a300-b4-professional

 

This one i am waiting for, i belive this is much better than inibuilds A300 in case of performance and fluid and maybe more, with the inibuilds one i have a lot problems with performance and i belive there are a lot memory leaks with that plane.

At a last flight i had a hold about a Minute and a lot long stutters over my flights .

This plane needs a complete overwork, code and model itself like they did with KJFK and other Airports.. 

cheers 😉

14 hours ago, UrgentSiesta said:

"...season..."????

Night Time is Flight Time 😁

Yes, you have a valid point there.

On 3/21/2024 at 2:23 PM, Ron Lefebvre said:

Just Flight BAE Avro RJ is the one I wanted.

They made it sound before Christmas that is was just around the corner.

I hate that. Might just stick with the BAE-146.

 

Sorry if you thought it was just around the corner, what reference from us made you think that?  We put out a Dev update prior to Christmas with details on all projects, as that's what people had been requesting.  We explained the RJ would be the next Airliner release but don't think we intimated that it would be around the corner.  It's making good progress but the nature of the beast with this kind of project means tons of work happens but it's work not conducive to showing off as we go along.  We hope to have it ready for release middle of the year, all out to make that happen but obviously no guarantees at this point.  We will though be brining you a further update in early April to show the latest work and where we're at with things.  Hope that helps. 

16 hours ago, carlanthony24 said:

 

 

6 hours ago, JustFlightScott said:

Sorry if you thought it was just around the corner, what reference from us made you think that?  We put out a Dev update prior to Christmas with details on all projects, as that's what people had been requesting.  We explained the RJ would be the next Airliner release but don't think we intimated that it would be around the corner.  It's making good progress but the nature of the beast with this kind of project means tons of work happens but it's work not conducive to showing off as we go along.  We hope to have it ready for release middle of the year, all out to make that happen but obviously no guarantees at this point.  We will though be brining you a further update in early April to show the latest work and where we're at with things.  Hope that helps. 

You should release it right around the time it's ready 😉

VERY much looking forward to it. 👍

Edited March 23, 20242 yr by UrgentSiesta
Oops

On 3/23/2024 at 7:31 AM, JustFlightScott said:

Sorry if you thought it was just around the corner, what reference from us made you think that?  We put out a Dev update prior to Christmas with details on all projects, as that's what people had been requesting.  We explained the RJ would be the next Airliner release but don't think we intimated that it would be around the corner.  It's making good progress but the nature of the beast with this kind of project means tons of work happens but it's work not conducive to showing off as we go along.  We hope to have it ready for release middle of the year, all out to make that happen but obviously no guarantees at this point.  We will though be brining you a further update in early April to show the latest work and where we're at with things.  Hope that helps. 

"As work nears completion on the traditional systems, focus is now beginning to turn to the autopilot and navigation systems, two areas that differ significantly from the 146."

I think most of us stopped ready after "As the works nears completion"

Knowing its not before summer or even maybe by Christmas is fine. Heck even next year is fine if its a great product.  It's not having a timetable at all that is frustrating.

In the meantime I have been really enjoying your BAE-146.

I thank you for responding. Class act like your products.

 

3 hours ago, Ron Lefebvre said:

Knowing its not before summer or even maybe by Christmas is fine. Heck even next year is fine if its a great product.  It's not having a timetable at all that is frustrating.

Really?

You expect a "timetable" for release?   That really isn't how software development works.  What would the purpose of having a timetable be, if that timetable needs to be changed constantly.

Which other addon has ever provided a timetable for release?    All we ever get is hopeful estimates - up until the development is finished and (some) developers give a "it will release next Tuesday" announcements.

I think your expectations are misguided - and unreasonable towards the dev.

6 minutes ago, JYW said:

Really?

 think your expectations are misguided - and unreasonable towards the dev.

Ya I don't get it don't make much sense to me.

27 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Ya I don't get it don't make much sense to me.

No it is not. What kind of nonsense that.

You think I can tell my boss you will get it when you get . No. Some sort of  timetable exist and is needed.

They put the project out there. They are advertising it and I am their client.

It s not that hard to make a general timetable and say not expect something before 2025. This is not their first project. They have been there before.

By the way, they just gave us a timetable. Not before summer if all goes well. See. It is possible.