Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Poll: MSFS2024 performance

MSFS2024 vs MSFS2020 performance 299 members have voted

  1. 1. My performance in MSFS2024 is...

    • Better than MSFS2020
      51%
      154
    • Worse than MSFS2020
      33%
      99
    • Same as MSFS2020
      15%
      46

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

  • Author

This popped up in my YT feed today:

What they talk about, is that turning off certain monitoring items in MSI Afterburner can improve performance. In particular GPU and CPU power sensors. The creator of the video mentions the following: 

Quote

This is NOT exclusive to MSI Afterburner. It happens with CapFrameX and HWInfo too, as per the CFX dev. CapFrameX informed me that it's an issue with the NVAPI. The GPU in the video is a 4090. Also, my 12700K and 14600KF do not exhibit the same issue as my 7800X3D with MSI Afterburner, and I believe it is due to the e-cores.

It could be that the issue is less pronounced on the 7950X3D and similar dual chiplet CPU's (twice the number of cores). 

I haven't tested this the usual way with CapFrameX, but doing a test flight now. It seems to me that there are fewer spikes on the frametime graph i.e. fewer stutters. Even when there are stutters, they seem "milder" than usual. 

I also disabled all the sensors that aren't in the OSD (by unticking them - see red box that I added in screenshot below):

2h6kpQD.png

Edited by Cpt_Piett

7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5

  • Replies 148
  • Views 25.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Allright here we go... drumrolll... MSFS2024 vs MSFS2020 performance comparison! Situation: iniBuilds A320 Neo flying at 3000ft and 250kts from EGLL to EGLC.  Settings: 4K DLSS+DLAA, FG on,

  • I think it's time to stop thinking that your hardware and settings are the cause of stuttering and other existing problems. For me the major problem is their cloud server, no more no less. After FS202

  • When it's working for me, performance is better for me in 2024 than 2020. However, currently, 2024 CTD's on me about every third time, when I pick my aircraft (does not matter which one). That said, o

It should be a good sign that the majority are getting same or better performance at the beginning of 2024’s cycle. After a few rounds of optimization, and hopefully a good FSR integration, performance will be outstanding.

i910900k, RTX 3090, 32GB DDR4 RAM, AW3423DW, Ruddy girt big mug of Yorkshire Tea

  • Author

I've been giving myself a massive headache trying to troubleshoot VRAM overflow (with a 4090!) and terrible stutters overflying certain PG-areas. So far, the LA area has been the worst. Approach Asobo's KLAX from the east, it's a word not allowed stutterfest. AutoFPS cannot save the day. Even with a TLOD of 100, there are severe stutters. Also - 99% of the 24GB VRAM available on my 4090 was being used at times. 

Solution: I first disabled PG - significantly better, but still severe stutters on final approach. With both PG + Asobo's KLAX disabled, performance was great. 

I wonder how many other areas in the sim are like this? I guess I'll try Asobo's Heathrow next. 

7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5

26 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said:

I've been giving myself a massive headache trying to troubleshoot VRAM overflow (with a 4090!) and terrible stutters overflying certain PG-areas. So far, the LA area has been the worst. Approach Asobo's KLAX from the east, it's a word not allowed stutterfest.

 

I confirm this observation
I made a KLAX/ILS 25R approach with the 737 Max Asobo and KLAX MSFS. From 200 Ft, I switched to slide mode for: landing, taxiing, RWY exit and there I stopped !!!

•    Intel Core i7 12700KF
•    MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
•    RAM : 2 x 32 Go (64 Go) - DDR4 3200 MHz - CL14
•    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G

 

Edited by Area

Config : AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DMSI PRO B850-S WIFI6E - RAM G.Skill 2 x 32 Go DDR5 6000 MHz CL30 - MSI GeForce RTX 5080 16G VENTUS 3X OC PLUS - 2 WQHD (2560x1440) screens and only one of which is for MSFS

50 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said:

I've been giving myself a massive headache trying to troubleshoot VRAM overflow (with a 4090!) and terrible stutters overflying certain PG-areas. So far, the LA area has been the worst. Approach Asobo's KLAX from the east, it's a word not allowed stutterfest. AutoFPS cannot save the day. Even with a TLOD of 100, there are severe stutters. Also - 99% of the 24GB VRAM available on my 4090 was being used at times. 

Yeah, I hope they get this sorted out soon.

  • Author

London Heathrow, PG enabled, default Asobo handcrafted (or is it bespoke?). Very good performance overflying the city center at 3000ft then on approach to rwy 27R. At least until 4nm final - then a stutterfest. So I'm guessing there's performance issues with Asobo's EGLL as well. 

For some reason I got stutters taking off from LFAC in France, which is not a very dense area. Strange!

At least London's PG seems better optimized than LA. 

EDIT: I'm not doing any CapFrameX tests here. Just using MSI Afterburner sensors + RTSS overlay to monitor the frame time graph for spikes. In this particular flight, there were quite a few spikes overflying London, but not too bad in terms of stutters. 

Edited by Cpt_Piett

7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5

  • Author

Sorry for the post spam. I tried London again after disabling handcrafted EGLL. Approach from the east was a stutterfest as I got close to the airport. But strangely not so much over the CBD. So it might be that London PG is not as bad as LA. But I suspect that PG is the culprit here. Next: ILS approach 27L/R with PG disabled. 

It'll be interesting to hear if other people are having issues with Asobo handcrafted airports and PG - it doesn't look very good so far in my testing!

EDIT: VRAM was almost fully used when overflying PG-London. This might be a trend - even a 4090 w/ 24GB cannot handle huge metropolitan PG-areas. 

EDIT2: Performance is much better without PG and Asobo-EGLL. Next: Asobo EDDF vs Aerosoft EDDF - without PG (don't even know if Frankfurt has PG). 

Edited by Cpt_Piett

7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5

29 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said:

This might be a trend - even a 4090 w/ 24GB cannot handle huge metropolitan PG-areas. 

That is just bonkers.

  • Author
1 hour ago, Cpt_Piett said:

Next: Asobo EDDF vs Aerosoft EDDF - without PG (don't even know if Frankfurt has PG). 

Aerosoft performs a bit worse than Asobo handcrafted EDDF. Not much of a difference though. No VRAM overflow (PG disabled)- seems that this happens in those huge metro PG-areas e.g. London and LA. I suspect something weird is happening with MSFS2024 PG and some handcrafted airports 🧐

Edited by Cpt_Piett

7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5

I personally am doing much better than 2020, 2020 was killing me in the main thread.

My computer is very modest i7 11700, 3060ti and 16 GB of RAM. The key as I said in another thread I think is to have a fast and stable connection and logically the server responds well.

Your conclusion in accord with mine Agios77. Your computer specs also similar to mine.

On 12/30/2024 at 1:21 PM, Sethos said:

So at least on a 9800X3D, I wouldn't suggest enabling Game Mode. 

I've been thinking of building a new setup with a 9800X3D - I'm an intel guy but not from what I've read lately AMD is way to go for many reasons now

I have intel I9 10900k - water cooled - 64 GIG of ram - Asus RTX 4080 Supper OC - 48" Samsung OLED - its working well but would I notice a huge difference with that AMD chip ? bunch of money so thought I ask - thanks 

Edited by Richard Sennett

Rich Sennett

               

Just read this over at MSFS Forums

Nothings ever easy with Flightsim - chase chase the prefect experience

X3D chips are useless in this game since the game is using cores,not cache

Edited by Richard Sennett

Rich Sennett

               

35 minutes ago, Richard Sennett said:

Just read this over at MSFS Forums

Nothings ever easy with Flightsim - chase chase the prefect experience

X3D chips are useless in this game since the game is using cores,not cache

I have a 4090 with a 7950X3D and 64 gigs of ram, I've had it for a while now. I'm lucky enough to upgrade whenever I please. I've been building and upgrading for FS since the early 90's

 

I have no thoughts about upgrading at this point. For me FPS is a non issue in FS2020 or 2024. For me its all about microstutters while using my TRackIR, which isn't that much of an issue either.

 

I'm a happy camper, a lot happier than the usual with my rig and a new release of MSFS

Floyd Stolle

www.stollco.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.