2 hours ago, romaf12008 said:

Why is there no smoke when landing from under the landing gear? MSFS2020

saw that too after landing and parked at the gate, obviously smoke from the brakes

9 minutes ago, Simon_C said:

 

Btw... apparently Fenix did want to create A350, but cancelled it, once they realized ini was creating one and were more ahead than Fenix.

Shure, why should they if one is out,

maybe they go than to another projekt ?

And why more System depht, the plane is already heavy on performance and i assume more depht gets the plane more heavy in fluid and performance so not all things are working like pople may think..

cheers 😉

8 minutes ago, pmplayer said:

Shure, why should they if one is out,

maybe they go than to another projekt ?

And why more System depht, the plane is already heavy on performance and i assume more depht gets the plane more heavy in fluid and performance so not all things are working like pople may think..

cheers 😉

They already confirmed they are working on some other things for the A320 row, and that there is a new long-term project which has not been revealed.

Why more system depth? Because we simmers like it like that? More heavy? I don't see FSLabs or Fenix being heavy on the performance, just because they have more systems depth. I don't believe that correct abnormal operations, more or even all ECAM messages, would cost much more performance. And if it meant making textures for numbers instead of stickers, and thus getting more system depth and correct system interaction, I would take that any day over nicer stickers and engraved buttons.

EDIT: honestly, do you think casual and xbox simmers will care about stickers and engraved buttons? Those are the ones bringing the money.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Simon_C

Does anyone run it with specs roughly as inibuilds shows them as required, i.e. with a 2080 card or similar? If so, it would be nice to hear how it performs on such a rig. Thanks. 

42 minutes ago, flight_joke said:

Found a bug within 5 minutes, clicking on "sync company flight plan" on the init page in the FMS instantly freezes the sim (fs2024). Another carefully tested add on for us beta testers...

You use the Navigraph Airac? 

If so deactivate it an try again. 

11 minutes ago, Farlis said:

You use the Navigraph Airac? 

If so deactivate it an try again. 

Um yeah, why would I do that? They explicitly noted as compatible with Navigraph. Tested day before release. With Navigraph.

Sorry, my understanding here is short.

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Simon_C

1 minute ago, Simon_C said:

Um yeah, why would I do that? They explicitly noted as compatible with Navigraph. Tested day before release. With Navigraph.

Sorry, my understanding here is short.

Just do it. 

The Navigraph Airac for the base sim Navigation Database causes a WASM crash in the A350 that needs fixing. 

So use the default instead. 

You can still use the Navigraph Database for the aircraft. 

So what you are talking about is deactivating Navigraph for the MSFS2024 itself, but not for or in the aircraft itself?

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Simon_C

13 minutes ago, Simon_C said:

So what you are talking about is deactivating Navigraph for the MSFS2024 itself, but not for or in the aircraft itself?

Yes, exactly. 🙂

I read about this Bug and was not affected because I already deactivated the Navigraph data beforehand, because I kept running into issues with missing airways when programming routes in the default Garmins that have to do with the data not being correctly read by the sim. 

Edited February 27, 20251 yr by Farlis

Glad I hold off, not going to uninstall Navigraph for the sake of one single addon to work. Usually, Navigraph fixes those things pretty fast, no?

1 minute ago, AnkH said:

Glad I hold off, not going to uninstall Navigraph for the sake of one single addon to work. Usually, Navigraph fixes those things pretty fast, no?

You don't really need the base sim Navigraph data. 

The Lido data is good enogh

And most add on airliners like the Fenix, PMDG come with their own database anyway. 

25 minutes ago, Farlis said:

You don't really need the base sim Navigraph data.

but he's paying for it 😄

8 hours ago, YukonPete said:

I can't use it in 2024. It freezes up within 10 seconds of loading.

Are you using the Nvidia App?  This happened to me with the A380 and the App was the issue.

16 minutes ago, EGLD said:

but he's paying for it 😄

And the charts. Much more worth than the simple Airac. 

2 hours ago, Simon_C said:

 honestly, do you think casual and xbox simmers will care about stickers and engraved buttons? Those are the ones bringing the money.

"Xbox simmers" will not be "bringing the money" to MSFS 2024 while there is no Marketplace.
There is nothing at all wrong with those who do not share a passion for "systems depth". 
Anyone can take whatever they want out of a simulation, there is no right and wrong and certainly
there is no better or worse.
That's why developers, who mostly realise this, usually include a load and go option for those who do
not necessarily wish to jump through the real world hoops that are needed to fly a real one, while including
as many metres of systems depth as they can for those who do.
It's called catering for all tastes.