Bought it, and love it, initial slow first load as normal with WASM being compiled, But after that, it just loaded the same as other high fidelity aircraft.

36 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

So you not going to buy it because of no cabin for 2020 verion?

There is cabin for 2020 but as they called it "Lite" without electronic and crew rest compartments.

 

HOW ABOUT THE WEATHER "RADAR"? 

8 minutes ago, Vitold69 said:

There is cabin for 2020 but as they called it "Lite" without electronic and crew rest compartments.

 

HOW ABOUT THE WEATHER "RADAR"? 

So the 2020 version "does" have a cabin?  

49 minutes ago, lenny777 said:

Bought. Tried to start at Orbx NSZH airport with the 900 Cathay Livery - first time hung up at airport screen then next time crashed. I'm going to try at another airport RJAA and non Orbx. This is in MS/24

Then tried the 1000 Virgin Atlantic in RJAA crashed again when loading the airport screen. 

Tried again at LFBO with the 1000 this is a default airport. The two above where not. And it loaded. I'm going to try in another non-default airport of mine - PANC and see what happens. So I ended the flight at LFBO and it froze. Had to call up the Task Manager.

Decided to start at default airport with the 1000 at KSFO and loading screen at airport view crashed.

 

Tried again at KSFO with 1000 and this time loaded. Success rate for the simple load is iffy as far as I can see. No cabin loaded on this one.

Do you have SU1 Beta installed?

it is required for stability.

I’ll have to live vicariously through you all as ironically I’m waiting to board a flight on the A350’s much smaller cousin an A321.

I’ve got some YouTube previews downloaded though to watch on the flights out and back so I’m good to go Friday.  

Keep the first impressions coming!

Edited February 26, 20251 yr by regis9

3 minutes ago, psolk said:

So the 2020 version "does" have a cabin?  

no. There isnt. They have left over some Cabin Window "parts" only to setup for camera views. But no seats, no complete cabin "tube" (walls) and no windows everywhere. So imagine like a cabin, with removed 90% of all textures....and left some parts.

 

4 minutes ago, penta_a said:

Do you have SU1 Beta installed?

it is required for stability.

yes

Just now, mpo910 said:

no. There isnt. They have left over some Cabin Window "parts" only to setup for camera views. But no seats, no complete cabin "tube" (walls) and no windows everywhere. So imagine like a cabin, with removed 90% of all textures....and left some parts.

 

Thank you, there is so much misinformation "flying" around (pun intended)

£70 no thanks.

2 minutes ago, bhx22 said:

£70 no thanks.

I mean, I respect your opinion but what exactly did you expect? You get the A350-1000, -900 and later -900ULR for MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024. That's a pretty good price for a high end aircraft add on and in line with buying the full Fenix line up. One PMDG 777 variant alone sets you back not far off £70 alone...if you buy the -300ER, the F and soon the -200ER that's a lot more than £70...

7 minutes ago, bhx22 said:

£70 no thanks.

As I said once… barely enough for a decent family lunch.

It is priced correctly, even possibly slightly below the market price. 

Edited February 26, 20251 yr by Simon_C

cany anyone tell me if you can control heading, speed etc mapped to your joystick....I use the TCA airbus Joystick and have these assigined, as with the fenix you cant do this unless you use spad next.etc...anybody advise please??

anybody with some performance comparison? 

is the performance better then ini A300 premium in MSFS2024? 

in comparison to other high quality products? Fenix, RJ85/100, PMDG 777 etc? 

Thank's

There are always going to be people who want to tell the developers what they would be "willing" to pay and that making things cheaper would results in more sales but they fail to realize there are usually a number of metrics behind price including development and ongoing support costs which get diluted if you make a product too cheap and end up supporting a higher volume long term.  

Since everyone likes analogies here it's as useful as walking into a Porsche dealership and telling them their 911 TurboS is too expensive but you would buy it if they knocked 80% off the price LOL 

1 hour ago, speedyTC said:

Yet the asking price remains the same. Interesting.

Easy one to solve - buy 2024 and have the best of both.