2 hours ago, LineDX said:

Fenix se basa en Prosim. Si consultan el sitio web de Prosim, podrán ver quiénes son y cuál es su base de clientes. Lo que hizo Fenix fue portar su trabajo a msfs bajo una licencia. Fenix no es un producto desde cero. ECAM y todo el contenido casi real de Fenix proviene de Prosim. Por lo tanto, comparar un software empresarial portado con uno escrito desde cero es injusto, en mi opinión. Los comentarios de Amir de Fenix sobre ini 350 me parecen muy poco profesionales. 

Hay mucho potencial de mejoras en el ini 350 en el futuro. 

Unprofessional ? I do not think so, it seems to me that it was a little light on all the smoke that was being generated around a350 as it is happening in the world of simulation for a few years.

 

4 hours ago, LineDX said:

Please check the vatism network and see the numbers. 

Regards 

I might as well check the weather report. What possible correlation is there between what people fly on vatsim and WASM issues? For all I know, half of them are having their aircraft freeze mid flight.

4 hours ago, LineDX said:

Fenix is based on prosim. If you check Prosim's website, you can see what they are and what their client base is. What Fenix did, is ported their work over to msfs under a license. Fenix is not a from the scratch product. ECAM and all the near real stuff in Fenix comes from prosim. So comparing a ported over enterprise level software to something written from scratch is unfair deal I think. The remarks Amir from Fenix made on ini 350, I find them very unprofessional. 

There is lots of potential for improvements in ini 350 in future ahead. 

Fenix has already taken away ProSim code. If you check the Discord Aamir already stated I can only confirm we aren't doing what ProSim did. So what you are saying is now not true.

• We’re so forked off from ProSim we can’t actually use their NEO stuff. 

 

And ya, totally easy to say "oh you just got ur ECAM from ProSim" but uhh, we've axed the ProSim ECAM in dev and are now running our own, complete solution. So, yeah, we've built an ECAM - and one that is more in depth than ProSim at this stage. So I know what it takes, and how it goes from ground up.

Edited March 13, 20251 yr by carlanthony24

5 hours ago, LineDX said:

Please check the vatism network and see the numbers. 

Regards 

Only other day I checked and someone on Vatsim also on Volanta was spinning in complete circle. So looking at Vatsim just for numbers proves nothing. Can you tell me how many are using Xplane or FSX for instance from it?

Edited March 13, 20251 yr by carlanthony24

FWIW, when I was en-route EGLL-KSAN yesterday for my VA I checked our live ACARS. Of the 47 flights in progress 22 (including mine) were using the Inibuilds A35K (we don't use the -900). 15 were on MSFS2020, 7 on MSFS2024.

I can assure you that none of us would be setting out on long-haul flights without time compression if we were expecting the flight to fail.
EGLL-KSAN was 11h03m, KSAN-EGLL today was 09h52m.

3 hours ago, Aglos77 said:

Unprofessional ? I do not think so, it seems to me that it was a little light on all the smoke that was being generated around a350 as it is happening in the world of simulation for a few years.

 

Being CEO of a competitor company it is indeed unprofessional. I am sure behind the scenes there might be some problems with Fenix which a normal simmer don't see. Scripted VS simulated engine start, normal simmer doesn't care.  How many times you see pmdg, majestic, fslabs pointing those out publicity.

Edited March 13, 20251 yr by LineDX

1 hour ago, carlanthony24 said:

Fenix has already taken away ProSim code. If you check the Discord Aamir already stated I can only confirm we aren't doing what ProSim did. So what you are saying is now not true.

• We’re so forked off from ProSim we can’t actually use their NEO stuff. 

 

And ya, totally easy to say "oh you just got ur ECAM from ProSim" but uhh, we've axed the ProSim ECAM in dev and are now running our own, complete solution. So, yeah, we've built an ECAM - and one that is more in depth than ProSim at this stage. So I know what it takes, and how it goes from ground up.

I do computer programming, once you have access to the source code(prosim), you use it, customize it and move away from it(Amir claim). 

Next time when you write your own there is no innovation. It's simply copy and paste someone else's ideas. To be honest I don't give Fenix any credit for that. 

Nice, updated to 1.03 and got my first WASM crash ever. Not really sure if they are capable of fixing their WASM stuff to be honest, they currently look like Asobo: not really knowing what is going on with their products, just as Asobo obviously doesnt really know what their own sim is doing... amateurs...

19 minutes ago, LineDX said:

Being CEO of a competitor company it is indeed unprofessional. I am sure behind the scenes there might be some problems with Fenix which a normal simmer don't see. Scripted VS simulated engine start, normal simmer doesn't care.  How many times you see pmdg, majestic, fslabs pointing those out publicity.

Maybe I mixed up something, but he said couple of times that his comments were done as a customer, and not as CEO of Fenix. He bought it and gave his honest opinion. I don't see a fault here.

8 minutes ago, LineDX said:

I do computer programming, once you have access to the source code(prosim), you use it, customize it and move away from it(Amir claim). 

Next time when you write your own there is no innovation. It's simply copy and paste someone else's ideas. To be honest I don't give Fenix any credit for that. 

Basically you don’t know anything got it.

2 minutes ago, AnkH said:

Nice, updated to 1.03 and got my first WASM crash ever. Not really sure if they are capable of fixing their WASM stuff to be honest, they currently look like Asobo: not really knowing what is going on with their products, just as Asobo obviously doesnt really know what their own sim is doing... amateurs...

One report is enough for me...

Just had my first WASM crash in the ini A320NEO. Only wanted to do a wind uplink.

51 minutes ago, carlanthony24 said:

Basically you don’t know anything got it.

K sir you know everything. Happy 

33 minutes ago, LineDX said:

K sir you know everything. Happy 

Well I just proved they don't have Old code from ProSim. Only you can't accept.

Edited March 13, 20251 yr by carlanthony24

...v1.0.3 is now > PMDG 777; tbh, a broken iniBuilds A350 still beats that Skizo product just by default! 😛