Tino

Yup, 100% agree. I've been saying this for over a year now. It's a great program and making it subscription only, will allow it to be self sustaining.

From what I've read, PBR will be introduced with the A321 first, then other aircraft as updates. A321 Climb performance can be quite good, actually. Depending on a lot of factors.

Gotchya! I will have to take a look before purchasing. Thanks for the heads up!

Are you talking systems or modeling? I think the modeling and interior look fantastic and with PBR implemented, it looks nothing like anything from the FSX days.... Are you sure you are watching the correct video? lol

I second this!

I still remember that April Fools joke Aerosoft pulled many years ago. Somthing along the lines of the "Jet A" USB stick. Immerse yourself with the smell of JET-A while you fly. 🤣 Sadly, I would of purchased one lol....

Shhh! Some people on here might get triggered to know that certain dev's were working with them all along and will deny that fact for eternity. 🙂

The A320 alone is $200 CAD

I never stated I had a copy of the NDA. My point is, all information that Simbol is spreading should be considered "speculation" and not "fact" until he is able to prove from factual sources. I could easily say I'm also under NDA and do the same thing. I'll keep standing thanks.

Please show me 1 other developer who said they are actively working under NDA with MS. I would love to see that. I never said that an airplane by PMDG or others would be prepped in 8 months. Show me where I stated that? I said they could be actively working with Asobo \ MS. Doesn't mean they are working on a product for MS2020 release. High level dev's could be working with them on SDK's, Solutions, Development of certain area's for future integration. Who knows. You sure don't. That's why its called speculation. LOL Yup, many developers will need to learn. I never said they wouldn't, but I can guarantee some products will be out a lot sooner than 2023. lol

Do you see other developers saying they are under the FS2020 NDA? No. It's for a reason. Everything is speculation until proven. You are stating "facts" and asking people to believe you, when there's no way for people to confirm or backup your claims. Not sure why I'd have to go to the mods for that.

You would be breaching the NDA by simply stating that fact. No idea what your intentions are, but please do not spread speculation as "facts".

You love spreading false information, don't you? At least state it as speculation. Did you really just pull 2023 out of thin air? lol.

I'll try digging a little deeper and see what I find. Will report back. Thank you!

@kiek Have you seen this issue before with FSP models?

Sorry to bring this thread up again. It seems that my FSPXAI models all taxi out with reversers and spoilers deployed. Is there a way to fix this? I'm currently running v16.8 Thank you.

Ok, thank you. Will do option #1. Cheers,

My apologies. I must of read that incorrectly. How about the other items? Is that something you could possibly look into? Thank you.

Good morning, I was going to comment on the last topic about the E175, since some of the type codes are missing which creates issues with matching the correct model. There are two versions on the E175: E75L (LR version which incorporates the New Winglets). E75S (The regular non-LR version with the Old Winglets). Also, AILG switches E170 type code to E175. This shouldn't happen since E170 is the correct type code. For example: My JAL E170's are showing up as different aircraft since the type code gets changed automatically by the program. Is there a possibility to include this fix in the next update? Thanks for your time.

Show me Pyongyang, North Korea, or rural parts of China. That should be a good test.

This is nothing new in the development world. Dev's need to evolve with technologies. Some can't control the outcome of that. At least an SDK will be provided. I agree, it's the unfortunate side of developing products for any platform, really. It's been the same story for every release of a new flight sim. Developers adapt and bring forth their knowledge to make something great for a new platform.

I've seen some comments over the past 24 hours that indicate they are either frustrated, nervous, jealous or that a new sim might make them obsolete. Or a combination of all those items 😎

Just because it shows they made games for younger kids does not mean they can't focus on other technologies. Some of which, are "proof of concepts". These concepts get eaten up from other development studios and various companies if the technology suits their needs. (Exactly what happened in Microsoft's case). The concept was brought forward and this is the result. I can tell you from experience that having all your eggs in one basket is considered suicide in the development industry.

Actually, I found an easier way to obtain lots of liveries with FSPXAI and FAIB models. I use AIGAIM-OCI to install flight plans\models\repaints. After everything is installed, you can edit the atc_model= under the "general" section of each AI aircraft and ensure the correct ICAO codes are used. Then, I use AIGenerator to create the list. Much more simple if you want to utilize the paywayre models without spending crazy about of hours. 😎

I am also seeing this but it's due to RealTraffic. I'm still on a older version PSX. This month will be my last subscription to Real Traffic until it gets fixed. Unfortunately, so many issues with it these days. It no longer has the immersion it used too. Found the email for RealTaffic, I will be sending an email later today: contact@inside.net