Jump to content

HighTowers

Members
  • Content Count

    2,462
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,434 Excellent

1 Follower

About HighTowers

  • Rank
    Member - 2,000+

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo
    yvr26r

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    LSZH
  • Interests
    Flight simulators, Aviation, Computers, Electronics,

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    Other
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes

About Me

  • About Me
    Been flying PC flight simulation since Bruce Artwick days. . Worked for Canadian Airlines on the ramp 6 years at CYVR.
    I7-9700k 32gb 3600mhz DDR4 Gigabyte z390 Aorus Ultra Zotac RTX 2080TI AMP, Samsung 960 Pro 512gb
    Currently residing near LSZH

Recent Profile Visitors

4,971 profile views
  1. Its a real shame that MSFS is so restrictive to 3rd party especially the lack of fundamental wx radar in aircraft. I get the licensing and data restriction, but you would think there would be a solution that is amicable for both sides. Its a no go if your radar is not active. I would love to support AS but presets dont particularly interest me too much and like the live weather aspect. Think its best to wait to see what MSFS2024 brings.
  2. Wow impressive level of detail for systems fidelity. Love it. Really great work. Indeed the sounds were super sweet! Can't wait to fly this one too.
  3. I just ran the MS store, and it updated some xbox stuff, then clicked on profile to make sure all is good. Restarted PC, and no more "insert disc" error.
  4. In in on day one just like every other release since 1985. Although at that time I had to physically go to the store and wait in line. For the sake of reality, I am sure there will be teething problems, but I hope that devs have a long enough time before final release that they can have most of their products almost ready within weeks or a month or two of release. A reason this version was done, is the rewrite for things that are not really feasible right now. I expect it to be a pretty significant step forward. On the dream side of things, I would like to see a big surprise of a whole new simulation within the 'Flight simulation'' world. Like the ocean and lakes having a complex hydro dynamics for a realistic ship simulation. Ships are there now, but there really isnt a proper interaction with ships and boats. Of course this would have to run separate in the sim, and 'turn off' the flight sim world otherwise we might end up with 2 FPS. It would also mean another dedicated team, and thats just a whole lot more resources needed. Maybe flight sim 2032 would be more realistic. Then we will have both flight sim world, ship sim world and train sim world all in one interacting with each other lol.
  5. That’s was one impressive showcase video. More importantly, I’m astounded at the detail and quality. Lots of payware doesn’t even match this. This deserves a standing ovation for the work and dedication on this project. Can’t wait to fly it,! Thank you FBW team for setting such a high standard and great example of what can be done.
  6. Subscription model is for the birds. What a shame. Its a very nice simulation despite lacking harbor scenery. On the other hand , Navismaster is a modern version of Virtual Sailor NG. Still early Alpha, but the water and lighting looks pretty darn good for an Alpha. There is a free download and a Patreon version. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js8qNkEeBJA
  7. Looking really nice for long haul. Pleased the 77W is first too this time as well as gone are the rip off prices from P3D. More reasonable. Hoping for awesome startup sounds. Here the 77W starting up here all the time living near the airport.
  8. Very fair and great value now in a much simpler plan. Day one purchase for me.
  9. Definitely don’t want Google doing a flight sim. I can just see it now… a 5 sec ad pops up for ATC transmission, and 30 sec ad pop up for every takeoff and landing. YouTube is out of control with ads now.
  10. This thread amongst many others elsewhere is simply mind boggling. Not difficult to understand the very flexible range of options. Why there is this ruckus, is just the negativity that permeates everywhere and radiates to the next person. Years ago we all begged for better ATC, and complained the voices were extremely robotic. Now the ATC looks very promising and plausibly realistic, and you have choices for voice models. 1 of which is free. What is the problem? On top of that, control of AI traffic, with real-time voices. All sounds great to me. And no subscription.
  11. This looks awesome. Great video with no lipstick, just straight up transparency and big effort going into accuracy. Love the commitment to high fidelity here. Can't wait to fly this bird.
  12. Thumbs up from me too. Been trying out last few days. After experiencing this with overall fluidity, cant go back, and will have to tolerate the side effects of the camera panning jitter. The issue is the freesync monitor lowest refresh is 48hz to use freesync, although rarely got that much before in fps to match, but this mod helps keep that with enough overhead to be a whole lot more smoother. This is all off my now outdated 2080TI. Gave it a little more life, until stupid Nvidia stops being so greedy with outrageous pricing. Clearly not an issue for many , since the Navigraph survey has the 4090 as the top card in use by a long shot. Wow. @ nearly $2000/card.
  13. Wow great news to have much higher fidelity. I think alot of developers can reflect on the sampling from the Navigraph survey, with many seeking high level systems simulation, accuracy and quality. Its been a long long time since we had a very high level fidelity B757 in the simulation atmosphere in many years.
  14. Just to put this out there, forget where I read it, or heard it, but I dont think it necessarily works well just by turning it on. The whole point of AI deep learning, is the learning part. Perhaps this is a scenario where it must learn and recalibrate the more times its used. Turning it on and saying it doesnt work well doesnt teach it anything. Just a thought.
  15. Actually I dont own it, but been following development from the start, developer twitch streams, and all news regarding it. I do not have a high tolerance for complete garbage or even half baked aircraft. The other MD-11 out there is a piece of trash. TFDI are certainly going to work out whats not working right and its clear to me they are highly committed. Its these kind of super critique attitudes for developers that put a real concerted effort, that end up being a drag, depressing, certainly not encouraging for them. Its one thing to be critical, its another to provide constructive criticism that motivates them to get it working right.so if you have a group of early access users, then for sure you find a whole lot more bugs a whole lot more than a small dedicated beta team of 10 or 20. Anyone who figures that all these things can be fixed in a matter of weeks may need an adjustment in their thinking. We are here as a community to hopefully upbuild for great promising projects. Without it, we wouldnt have much properly done high fidelity aircraft.
×
×
  • Create New...