abranpuko

The 100000 modeller, modder, painter, designer of ai traffic, professional or not, that helped fsx, p3d to be better, are ignored by Asobo. Wonderfull airports (money makers), empty ai traffic.

well... the air traffic os MSFS are generic model, not with real airliners paintings, but with generic colours. they dont take off. with luck, sometime, you see some ai plane taxiing. they say there is real ai traffic. but that is not real. so, generic on or off, for me, its the same.

they sold us realist ai traffic. we have paid for empty airports. thats show bussiness!

yes, its very sad. thats why we havent stope writing the same sentences every day since almost one year. Ai traffic is not well designed although it was sold in their slogans. I wrote to asobo asking help and just a little bit of interest, more than designing the LOWI airport for a hotfix. even if there is the thought that most of people doesnt mind about it, we are a big minority, a very big one. ONce there is traffic: all people want it. i hope asobo listen us. im not writing dramatically, Im writing asking for help to enjoy the good MSFS. lets go!

you have crowded skies and airports with 320, 321,318,319,343,346,734,735,736,737,738,739,757,767,md11,md82,e195,etc,etc,,,,? with many airliners? you are lucky. tell us your secret😎

well, there is not ai traffic. (although they sold us there was). i bought deluxe edition and i have wonderfull airports and clouds. Well said: wonderfull empty airports and empty skyes. 🙂

yes ... you definitely belong to the first type.😉

plus there is no real air traffic

We have to continue asking Asobo about the ai traffic they have promised in their slogans before we put the money to buy the product license. Now we have paid, the only thing we have is YEAR21-22 under investigation???? do you mean: almost two years to investigate something they have not given but sold us?

Hi there. I belong to the group that defends the realism of air traffic. Te sect of "realist airlines".😎 Asobo has in his hands a great simulator that, curiously, has put air traffic aside a bit. While airports are full of detail, and the clouds are incredibly similar to reality, we land on runways and fly in skies with no realistic models and airlines. Well, in skies rather: empty. There are two types of clients ... 1) "wow !!! I have a 747, I'm going to see what happens if I crash into that mountain! ". When they have already crashed 7 times, they leave the MSFS, but the money: has already been invested. 2) those of us who want to fly, take off and land well, in an environment that is as close to realism as possible. but realism cannot be realism if the planes around you and their airlines are missing. They also spend money, and after: more money. I love both types. I have been both. Who cares? Before the SU5, we could at least have fsx models without CTD. But after SU5: 1) we can't have ai traffic. Only a certain number of models. 2) we can convert those models to gltf. (well, we can but we have to study a lot) 3) They can't do that, because those model are third party addons. my final thought: Thanks to hundreds of thousands of curious, creative users and gamers, the fsx became a living paradise of living elements: airplanes, models, liveries, etc, etc ... All those people contributed to generate what is today the flight simulator. Not only the current entrepreneurs and developers, whom I thank for their work: but all of the above. Are we lovers of airports full of air traffic punished? Why don't they make the way a little easier? Do you have to ask the creators of these models for permission? Why would they say "no", if before, those same models were free for fsx and prepar3d? Those models belong to creators who have made their models for free. Some say yes, and others say no. Their reasons are sometimes fuzzy. Many times they don't even want to be paid. They just want to say no, or to be asked (user to user) to use them. In conclusion, this only happens when there are no other models created. As soon as this happens, the kingship becomes relative. As always, multiplicity generates the market and you can CHOOSE. We have also invested time and money in it. Graphics cards, computers, ideas, time, etc, etc ... It's amazing that all ai traffic models are useless after SU5, and that all those thousands of models have worked before with fsx and prepar3d. We are not asking for a miracle, just a gesture, a detail with a very large group that loves realism and invests a lot of money in it: us. when they say: third party addons: deep down they mean everyone. Let's not forget that a company works because many people want that product. And this product is the result of the illusion of many simmers who have been playing and flying with passion for more than 20 years. That is why MSFS, FSX and P3D belong to everyone. We do not need the opinion of those who say "no" to everything. The world is one of those who say "yes, lets try". I do this writing with a smile, encouraging people who, like me, contribute little or much to ALL simulators being better. Sometimes with knowledge, sometimes with a lot of creativity, sometimes with money, etc., etc. Can they come together and generate an interactive world where we can put in and take out thousands of models without being nervous about the simulator stopping?

Although MSFS is a good simulator, the team offered us a product with live ai traffic that, unfortunately, doesn't exist. Its been a year since then. I have never liked when someone sells me unfinished products. I can allow some hotfix, but not a hotfix every month. Who refund us the technical problem? If this was a real plane, we'd had crashed. (and not to desktop)

What ai traffic?

and some day, when the planet earth will have only vegetals and microorganisms, we will have ai traffic.

Hahahaha

Oh, im going to test it. Usually, when i use learner, every time a plane arrived on gate, the number of updates changed. The same when plane takes off. I have exactly the same pic than yours. So, that means, as you said, that i have quickly jumped to conclusions. Anyway, i arrived on LPFR and saw many parked planes. That means i had an updated lpfr yet. Thanks for the help!

hello. I have downloaded new version, and, in my case, the learner 4.0 for MSFS doesnt learn. i have tested it with LPFR airport since two hourse. 10 planes have landed and taken off but, although it says live: 3 (For example), the update is always on zero. waht have i made bad?

all that was coming from lorby was great! when i used prepar3d, my traffic worked perfectly with his app! i hope we can have soon more like that! thanks lorby because you are a great example of a creative and generous person! holds!

Yes, its because we dont call "ai traffic" to what you show in the time-lapse of your video. Ai traffic is 100 different ai models, and more than 1000 airliners, behaving from a goood taxi to a good approach. (at least) We dont want skies full of the same ai plane. Usually, what happens to me is that everytime i say we have no ai traffic, someone comes and says: yes, i have! And shows (not you), a terrible pic of generic model going nowhere. We are into the style of quality of fsx ai traffic behavior (as minimum) Sounds interesting xd. Hahaha i always imagine passengers behave like the planes they take.

hahahaha

Putting a note of humor on them, sometimes I think that if everything worked well, the forums would not be used as much. Hopefully we will fill the forums with positive comments with things that do work, because lately (these last ten years), ninety percent is negative. And not because these users are unfriendly, but because things are usually sold without finishing working quite well.

Its like renting a house to make a party and finding there is no people to celebrate it. Thats what i felt when i bought MSFS. Of course, a wonderfull home but an empty home. Very detailed airports, but empty jetways, sometimes with the same generic ai plane. Its like finding every five meters the same cloud in the sky. Moreover, unfortunately, the traffic suffers the same thing that happened in prepar3d: slow taxiing, disobedience of the order for landing and sometimes erroneous approaches. The problem is that, when we write what we feel about that, it sounds a bit unpleasant, because it seems like a gratuitous complaint that is generalized, making it understood that we think that the simulator is word not allowed. And it is the opposite: the simulator is fantastic, but it is sad, because there is no intelligent LIFE in it. It would be wonderful if developers opened the doors for free creatives to contribute what they have done with fsx: a wonderful world of designs and models for air traffic. It has always been shown that much life brings more life. Please don't shut your mouth, much less for fear of being banned. It is necessary for the products to grow, for users to write their reviews. examples: There are several msfs user profiles and we are all neurotic hahahaha. The user who uses it to crash the first week "let's see what happens" and then gets bored. The pilot who wants to do all the procedures. The one who loves the clouds and trees, the one who has orgasms with airports and their interiors and, of course, the one who loves having to wait for take off because they have a beautiful a340 from Iberia in the final phase of approach. the designers of tails, taxilines, etc… We are ALL beautiful and we keep these companies alive. If they take care of us, we will take care of their jobs.

yes. Its terrible. Airports are full of people that are waiting for boarding. People is angry. Before SU5, pilots were drunk, ai planes only made circles. its a crisis! 😱

hahahah y love her face. it reminds me carol burnett

Hi there. Is there a way that users who love variety and realism can get back to air traffic models, again compatible with MSFS? Before the last update, although with small errors, we could enjoy a wide variety, because we had converted those fsx models (only for own use) to work in MSFS. That is: Airbus, (300,310,319,320,321,330,340,350,380), boeing (732,733,734,735,736,737,738,739,744,748,742,743,752,753,762,763,764,772,773,788,789, CRJ7, CRJ9, CRJX, Embraers, MD11, MD82, atrs ...) After the last update, the airports are full of detail, and empty of variety of traffic. It is true that we can use generic air traffic that MSFS brings, but it is also true that we can use generic airports. However, those of us who choose to spend money on a detailed airport, we do not aspire (most) the bought ones to be empty or with strange behavior of their generic planes. In my case, I love injecting traffic that is in sync with real life. I can get and create my own repaints, but I can't create models. the models, from fsx, are already done: is there someone who can convert them? I know that the majority answer is "No", except for the one whose answer is "yes". These questions are directed to that second person. Optimistic. I am too. For those who are not informed, currently, air traffic models generate a CTD when loaded and exceed the figure of 13 or 14. Before SU4 this did not happen. MSFS, could you give us a hand and help us? After working hard all year to be able to pay for the product, the month of summer arrives and coincidentally, we cannot fill our airports. Your generic Air traffic doesn't work well either: planes don't take off and they go very slowly. I do not doubt the effectiveness of your work: I see it in the clouds and the performance. Can you give us a hand to those of us who like true-to-life air traffic? Thank you.

wow!!!