Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

132 Excellent

About yanfeng12342000

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Recent Profile Visitors

1,251 profile views
  1. VR for me. Can't go back to 2D flying and other gaming.
  2. It depends. photogrammetry is good for some cities, and for airliners at least 2000 feet above the ground.
  3. I agree. I believe Bijan's trees have better shapes/models. They are also more consistent in regional outlooks while retaining natural transitions and varieties.
  4. Actually I like REX trees much more than default MSFS trees, which look OK from ground level, but can be a big eye sore looking down from the sky. The tree canopy is too rounded like mushrooms, or broccolis, just not real trees. It can be worse, as they often gave my goose bumps, thinking about diseased skin. You can see the pictures in this post: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/please-make-trees-look-less-rounded/498857 REX trees have much better shapes and don't look like mushrooms or broccolis. The reason why I like Bijan's trees more is because they have more varieties, just as Gsalden has said above. I like REX from FSX days. Really wish they can keep up the wonderful work and make it even better.
  5. I like the trees of Bijan more than Accuseason, but I am worried it seems to have stopped development.
  6. It had jittery every several seconds, but now it’s gone. Mine is 9900K + 3900, grahic high/ultra, DLSS balanced. Framerates around 34 over London. Quest 2 bandwidth maxed. SU 10 is godsend for VR. I am very happy.
  • Create New...