

yanfeng12342000
Members-
Posts
248 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Reputation
135 ExcellentProfile Information
-
Gender
Male
Flight Sim Profile
-
Commercial Member
No
-
Online Flight Organization Membership
none
-
Virtual Airlines
No
Recent Profile Visitors
1,700 profile views
-
Hello I built a new machine with 9950X3D+RTX5090 mainly for Pimax Super and MSFS 2024. I saw VR Flight Sim Guy got 40 fps in New York ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjAdf-JbNYE&t=2s ) . He has a 9800X3D, and that is the only difference between our system. I setup my MSFS 2024 and Crystal Super exactly as his according to his setup video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPseAZDaxKQ ), but to my dismay I only got 30 fps at most at the same location (London City Airport and New York). I tried Process Lasso and forced MSFS2024 to run on the 3D V-cache cores. I also tried enabling turbo gaming mode in the BIOS, which basically turned off the non 3D V-cache cores and made 9950X3D into a 9800X3D with 200mhz more clocks. All in vain. I am still 10 fps less than VR Flight Sim Guy. Some other information. We both set the rendering quality of Crystal Super to high, which is 6240x6280 for one eye! That's crazy resolution, and it makes 5090 the bottleneck. My GPU load is 98%, while CPU load is only 20% - 35% most of the time. We both set the anti-alias to TAA in MSFS 2024. That is also big load on GPU. Can you shed some lights on what I have done wrong, and what else I can do to increase the fps? 10 fps in VR is not neligible, and I really need that, other than I have a theoretically better CPU than VR Flight Sim Guy yet I still got 10 fps less! Edit: Thank you guys for the help.I now just wonder if any of you have 9800X3D+5090 or 9950X3D + 5090, can you test this graphic configuration below, and get the results for comparison here? Thanks a lot!
-
I am considering an upgrade from Intel 13900K as it's already struggling with RTX 5090. I know AMD is now the king for flight simulation, but I can't find any direct comparison between 9800X3D and 9950X3D. If money is not a problem, and used simply for flight simulation, which of the two will give the highest framerate?
-
Sim Update 2 Beta Released
yanfeng12342000 replied to MarcG's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020/2024)
That's a jump from rtx 4090 to 5090. Nice. -
I know they are from the career mode, but I don't have time to play that mode. I just want to take some free flight for sightseeing. I can recognize the monument valley, Yosemite valley, and Uluru, and I'd especially like to know the locations of the following scenes: 1. Cypress trees. Might be somewhere in Italy? 2. An airstip surrounded by coconut trees. 3. A beautiful lake. 4. A high bridge, or Rome water ducts? Thanks in advance for your help!
-
DLSS 4 Definitive guide.
yanfeng12342000 replied to Ianrivaldosmith's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020/2024)
Now that I have installed the new Nvidia driver and enabled the newest DLSS 4, is NVidia inspector still necessary for the new DLSS 4 to take effect? -
It is so much better than MSFS 2020 in VR, especially in the cockpit. The light effect makes you really feel you are there. And the trees, grasses, clouds, rocks, water... looks much more real than MSFS 2020. I set ALVR Transcoding view Resolution to 1.2x, and emulated resolution to 1.3x. I think that's crazy high rendering resolution, but it runs quite smoothly with MSFS 2024 graphic qualtity options mostly set to middle, and use TAA 80%. I think the smoothness owes much to effective forveated rendering. My PC is 4090/13900K. Have any others tried MSFS 2024 wiith Vision Pro? Strongly recommend it if you also have a capable PC. And I'd really like to know about your ALVR settings.