yanfeng12342000

I see, but most places don't have PG yet. And PG doesn't look good close up. Many people still prefer autogen, and really wish it could be better.

If that is not a bug, is there any addon or that can change the color of the buildings? Even better if building type can also be changed.

2024 beta 3. But I have checked with Youtube videos, and MSFS 2020 seems to be the same.

I have just found the roof colors of the custom buildings are mostly the same in different regions of the world. They are mostly white and light brown. I am very surprised I haven't noticed that before. Maybe it's because I mostly flew in mountain areas and photogrammetry cities in the past. I have tried a lot of different countries and cities. Norway, Switzerland, Australia, Shanghai ... they are all of the same color. Just try Venice with photogrammetry turned off, and you will see its roof color become white and light brown. Venice, can you believe that? Is there anything wrong with my setup, or is it also your case?

Can anyone with Crystal Super and 9800X3D and RTX5090 try VR Sim Flight Guy's configuration in the link above? I bought 9950X3D only for playing MSFS2024, and I'd definitely change it to 9800X3D if I can get 10 more fps.

VR Sim Flight Guy set most of his other graphic settings to medium or low, and his captured videos are very smooth, so I think that is possible. Can anyone try his configurations in the link above to give it a verification? I am really curious to know.

I have some doubts too, but his videos clearly shows 40 fps above new york and london. I just can't help being envious. 🙂

I will post on his discord to find out. Thanks for showing the way.

Hello I built a new machine with 9950X3D+RTX5090 mainly for Pimax Super and MSFS 2024. I saw VR Flight Sim Guy got 40 fps in New York ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjAdf-JbNYE&t=2s ) . He has a 9800X3D, and that is the only difference between our system. I setup my MSFS 2024 and Crystal Super exactly as his according to his setup video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPseAZDaxKQ ), but to my dismay I only got 30 fps at most at the same location (London City Airport and New York). I tried Process Lasso and forced MSFS2024 to run on the 3D V-cache cores. I also tried enabling turbo gaming mode in the BIOS, which basically turned off the non 3D V-cache cores and made 9950X3D into a 9800X3D with 200mhz more clocks. All in vain. I am still 10 fps less than VR Flight Sim Guy. Some other information. We both set the rendering quality of Crystal Super to high, which is 6240x6280 for one eye! That's crazy resolution, and it makes 5090 the bottleneck. My GPU load is 98%, while CPU load is only 20% - 35% most of the time. We both set the anti-alias to TAA in MSFS 2024. That is also big load on GPU. Can you shed some lights on what I have done wrong, and what else I can do to increase the fps? 10 fps in VR is not neligible, and I really need that, other than I have a theoretically better CPU than VR Flight Sim Guy yet I still got 10 fps less! Edit: Thank you guys for the help.I now just wonder if any of you have 9800X3D+5090 or 9950X3D + 5090, can you test this graphic configuration below, and get the results for comparison here? Thanks a lot!

Maybe graphic card is the bottle neck? What is your graphic card?

Great tips, thanks!

Thank you very much for the link. I have gone through it, and I am even more confused...😁

I am considering an upgrade from Intel 13900K as it's already struggling with RTX 5090. I know AMD is now the king for flight simulation, but I can't find any direct comparison between 9800X3D and 9950X3D. If money is not a problem, and used simply for flight simulation, which of the two will give the highest framerate?

That's a jump from rtx 4090 to 5090. Nice.

I know they are from the career mode, but I don't have time to play that mode. I just want to take some free flight for sightseeing. I can recognize the monument valley, Yosemite valley, and Uluru, and I'd especially like to know the locations of the following scenes: 1. Cypress trees. Might be somewhere in Italy? 2. An airstip surrounded by coconut trees. 3. A beautiful lake. 4. A high bridge, or Rome water ducts? Thanks in advance for your help!

Now that I have installed the new Nvidia driver and enabled the newest DLSS 4, is NVidia inspector still necessary for the new DLSS 4 to take effect?

It is so much better than MSFS 2020 in VR, especially in the cockpit. The light effect makes you really feel you are there. And the trees, grasses, clouds, rocks, water... looks much more real than MSFS 2020. I set ALVR Transcoding view Resolution to 1.2x, and emulated resolution to 1.3x. I think that's crazy high rendering resolution, but it runs quite smoothly with MSFS 2024 graphic qualtity options mostly set to middle, and use TAA 80%. I think the smoothness owes much to effective forveated rendering. My PC is 4090/13900K. Have any others tried MSFS 2024 wiith Vision Pro? Strongly recommend it if you also have a capable PC. And I'd really like to know about your ALVR settings.

I figured out the solution. Enter Steam VR setup, change the runtime from VDXR to openxr, and it's all set. PS: MSFS 2024 on Vision Pro is incredible.

Got it. Thank you so much!

How can I control the avatar to walk?

Is there any way to walk freely on the ground like in other games? I only know the camera and slew mode for viewing.

I have ALVR+Vision Pro worked perfectly with MSFS 2020, but it now shows "No headset is detected" when switching to VR with MSFS 2024. The combo is fine with other VR titles, and I have seen other people reporting success with ALVR + Vision Pro + MSFS 2024. I am going mad figuring it out. Can anyong shed any light on this? Thank you!

I agree. I believe Bijan's trees have better shapes/models. They are also more consistent in regional outlooks while retaining natural transitions and varieties.

Actually I like REX trees much more than default MSFS trees, which look OK from ground level, but can be a big eye sore looking down from the sky. The tree canopy is too rounded like mushrooms, or broccolis, just not real trees. It can be worse, as they often gave my goose bumps, thinking about diseased skin. You can see the pictures in this post: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/please-make-trees-look-less-rounded/498857 REX trees have much better shapes and don't look like mushrooms or broccolis. The reason why I like Bijan's trees more is because they have more varieties, just as Gsalden has said above. I like REX from FSX days. Really wish they can keep up the wonderful work and make it even better.

I like the trees of Bijan more than Accuseason, but I am worried it seems to have stopped development.