Speedbird 52
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Speedbird 52
-
-
Hello, for an issue like this I think PMDG should help you. But PMDG DID officially end support a while ago. Kashif EizdiHello everyone, I realize the title may anger a lot of you, but that was not the point. After reading some comments on a comparison video, I just felt the need to post this. Take a look at the comments on this comparison of PMDGs old 747, and iflys new 747. I was shocked to find people stubbornly defending PMDGs 10 year old product! Actually saying that it is superior to a 2014 product of quite high quality! Many of them insisted that the PMDG 747 had higher quality systems, and some even tried to say that the exterior modeling and VC was better! When they likely had never bought the product or even seen a good video of it! Why? Simply because it is PMDG. Now, PMDG obviously make extremely good products, but do you really think that a product that old will still be "the best"? Their response to my explanation of the products age: "Wait for the V2, it will be out in a few months!" Well, it has been two years, and where is the V2? NOWHERE! Because PMDG are taking their time to make a good product for us to enjoy! Correct me if I am wrong, but in 2014, PMDG were still working on the modeling! Had someone bought the ifly 747 when it was released (albeit with its numerous shortcomings and bugs...), they would have gotten their moneys worth by now, even if they did choose to buy PMDGs (quite possibly) "better" version. But its not only PMDG that has ######, ifly has their fair share too! When I posted several notable issues with the ifly 747 that I had observed from videos, I was called a "troll"! I could go on and on with examples, but I will leave it here. So what are your thoughts? Do we need to be more open as a community to other products? Or am I blatantly lying? One thing I do not want is to start a flamewar, so please lets have a constructive discussion, about this topic.To be honest, I don't like either. They both look bad, they both have issues. One is buggy, the other is too limited. Now if only there were to be a new 76/57...Hello everyone, I have seriously been considering purchasing a yearlong subscription to navigraph for charts, as it is nice to have information such as MDA, DH, and Acceleration/Deceleration heights. However, I am struggling to justify it. Right now, I can quite easily find free charts for most airports, yet I seldom touch them. I fly mostly heavy metal, and these planes come with everything I could need! I get the route on the display and fly it. It is quite rare that I ever need to look at a chart and I have never even touched an enroute chart. So what are your opinions on this? Is it worth it? And how will I use the charts?Hello everyone, I am planning to do a new Windows install, but I want to do it on a brand new hard drive. What hard drive do you recommend for FSX? I know SSDs have faster loading, but I do not know much else. Anything is appreciated!That was cruel Kashif EizdiDon't watch any of this guys videos. What he did was record FSX or P3D, and then edit it. He brands all of them as Flight Simulator (insert current year here). He also completely ripped off an idea from another well respected member of the flight sim community, JRSchipol, with his pathetic version called "remember".Hello everyone, for fun I have failied not one, but two engines on my NGX. However, I am left with no way of flying the plane! All the hydraulics are dead. How do I fly the plane in this state? Kashif EizdiTFDI are making a 717 Kashif EizdiA 747 classic would be amazing! Honestly though, I think that is in Captain Sims and Milwiz ball park...While with some tweeks the Level D is flyable, it is very old as of now. And after being spoiled by PMDG with their newer stuff, I cannot bear to fly anything of less quality! The FF stuff quite frankly looks worse then the Level D in my eyes. Coolsky have an MD 80 that looks amazing as well... Kashif Eizdi Judging from plans of a map built into the nav display, and the fairly extensive systems I would say it is a balance between the Aerosoft bus and PMDG level. I would say maybe ifly level complexity? In all honesty, while a lot of us can appreciate PMDG level detail, most of us cannot use all of the features in PMDG products... Kashif EizdiHonestly, I am 100% against this idea. Quality Wings have a very nice one in the works, and it is sure to be out soon. Meanwhile, there is not a single decent 757/767 available anywhere on any platform! If you were to ask me, the 75/67 is what PMDG should work on. It would be very profitable, as the 757 and 767 are very common aircraft. The 787 is only JUST starting to take the 767s jobs, and airlines are struggling to replace the 757. Kashif EizdiHey guys, when used in FSX cinematic or viewed from an exterior view, your effects are amazing! But as someone who fly's mostly in the VC, what will I notice?But-bu who will bring me my cup of tea?Download recently made AFCADs for all the airports you fly to. These simply update runways, navaids, and taxiways to match new charts and nav data. Kashif EizdiI know right? Such a good deal! Kashif EizdiQuite a lot, a whole new systems simulation brought on par with the T7, MUCH better visuals, more options to better simulate different variants, and maybe more! Kashif EizdiThe hype is real! Gonna buy it now!
