After having to read through your many posts going on and on about b****y autogen houses I really don't give a ********** anymore. Please SHUT UP about them or go and plague some other forum.

+1000000000000000000000000000000And you don't know how hard I laughed after I saw that Matthew quoted your post and replied with the "" emoticon. :(

+1I wish that Matthew guy would just shut up.

After having to read through your many posts going on and on about b****y autogen houses I really don't give a ********** anymore. Please SHUT UP about them or go and plague some other forum.

He is just passionate about it.

He is just passionate about it.

Yes, but he complained and complained and stated his opinion way more than enough times...so much that some wanted to go, "SLAP!"

Exactly, he's passionate about it just like others are passionate about believing that Flight can't be FSX reworked.See the problems is not really the oversized houses we are used to see in FSX but the problem is the oversized houses in Flight....déja vue again....will MS get them to be the right size in time for the release of Flight (including the trees)...maybe and maybe not but for some peoples their dreams of seeing something brand new not related to FSX what so ever out of the box are shattered by seeing the same problems, bugs, or what ever you want to call that when we point them out to them, but no matter what for some peoples MS can't do any wrong.We can disagree with somebody's point of vue and we can get tired of reading about it....fair enough so why don't we just stop reading about somebody's post we don't agree with or get tired of.

There's no need to be offensive (even when using asterisks) when one does not agree with a particular line of posts.If you are not interested in what a given set of posts have to say, then simply ignore those posts and learn to move on.Cheers,- jahman.

I'm with MatthewS on this. :(

I'm with MatthewS on this. :(

Oh no, you're not going to repeat that 47 times as well in this thread :( Hope not.

I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but has anyone else noticed the oversized autogen houses?Regards, Mike Mann

I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but has anyone else noticed the oversized autogen houses?Regards, Mike Mann

??? naaaa they look perfect side by side with trees.......

I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but has anyone else noticed the oversized autogen houses?Regards, Mike Mann

I'm glad SOMEONE'S mentioned it! It's been bothering me for the past 5 years. So who do we speak to about this little problem ?:(

I don't know how people can look at these screenshots and become overwhelmed with jubilation. Yes, it looks better--hard not to beat. But as of now, and be honest with yourself, MS Flight looks like a mod. You know a game is not much of a change when you're forced to create comparative screenshots to notice improvements, especially versus one made in 2006. This is what you call an upgrade from a game made five years ago? In the span of those five years, there's been a gigantic progression of graphics/tech. For example: Battlefield 2142 (2006) vs. Bad Company 2 (2010) or Battlefield 3 (Q4 2011) and Call of Duty 3 (2006) vs. Modern Warfare 2 (2009) (unfortunately) or Black Ops (2010). But before I get raged and trolled out of this forums for simple skepticism (I will anyways, just know that I don't care), I will note a couple things:1. The game is still early in its development.2. Because this is a simulator, and to satisfy their goal of a larger target audience, the graphics need to be more accommodative. Comparing them to games like BF and COD, that thrive off attracting graphics-junkies like myself, may be a little unfair. Although--as I mentioned--the game is still early in its development, these screenshots most likely provide an accurate view of the final product. To which I say I'm not impressed; I expected more, not crazy Battlefield 3 more, but just more than this. You can be happy that the game looks a little better but, get real, stop acting like the messiah is coming. Graphics are average at best.

I don't know how people can look at these screenshots and become overwhelmed with jubilation. Yes, it looks better--hard not to beat. But as of now, and be honest with yourself, MS Flight looks like a mod. You know a game is not much of a change when you're forced to create comparative screenshots to notice improvements, especially versus one made in 2006. This is what you call an upgrade from a game made five years ago? In the span of those five years, there's been a gigantic progression of graphics/tech. For example: Battlefield 2142 (2006) vs. Bad Company 2 (2010) or Battlefield 3 (Q4 2011) and Call of Duty 3 (2006) vs. Modern Warfare 2 (2009) (unfortunately) or Black Ops (2010). But before I get raged and trolled out of this forums for simple skepticism (I will anyways, just know that I don't care), I will note a couple things:1. The game is still early in its development.2. Because this is a simulator, and to satisfy their goal of a larger target audience, the graphics need to be more accommodative. Comparing them to games like BF and COD, that thrive off attracting graphics-junkies like myself, may be a little unfair. Although--as I mentioned--the game is still early in its development, these screenshots most likely provide an accurate view of the final product. To which I say I'm not impressed; I expected more, not crazy Battlefield 3 more, but just more than this. You can be happy that the game looks a little better but, get real, stop acting like the messiah is coming. Graphics are average at best.

finally, a new twist with the same end conclusion.(imho) just an honest opinion here folks.sorry MS. "I" see nothing so far from the "Flight" screenies to get overly excited about. not that much different than what we already have with FSX.give us "Flight" with double or triple the FSX performance With add-ons like the PMDG747X and i'll be impressed. unfortunately, i don't see that happening. because, my guess is that your still using that same Old, Slow, Out-dated, Archaic rendering engine with "Flight" that you've been using with the FS franchise pretty much from the beginning. and, If that's the case then that makes "Flight" that much more ho-hum for Me.happy flyin, FM

finally, a new twist with the same end conclusion.(imho) just an honest opinion here folks.sorry MS. "I" see nothing so far from the "Flight" screenies to get overly excited about. not that much different than what we already have with FSX.give us "Flight" with double or triple the FSX performance With add-ons like the PMDG747X and i'll be impressed. unfortunately, i don't see that happening. because, my guess is that your still using that same Old, Slow, Out-dated, Archaic rendering engine with "Flight" that you've been using with the FS franchise pretty much from the beginning. and, If that's the case then that makes "Flight" that much more ho-hum for Me.happy flyin, FM

Take a look at the tree shadows, aircraft self shadows, realistic lighting, soft building shadows, volumetric-looking clouds, Rex-quality water, Orbx quality Hawaii scenery, and new sky textures. Looks nothing like FSX. And it probably has outstanding performance as MS says it will. Impressed now? Honestly, after looking at the screens of Flight, then looking at FSX, I want to throw up because of how bad FSX looks. :biggrin:And remember, the FSX engine is fine. It's not outdated. It just has a lot of bugs. Remove the bugs, add good performance, a big graphical improvement like we have mostly seen with Flight, and you have a winner.

Take a look at the tree shadows, aircraft self shadows, realistic lighting, soft building shadows, volumetric-looking clouds, Rex-quality water, Orbx quality Hawaii scenery, and new sky textures. Looks nothing like FSX. And it probably has outstanding performance as MS says it will. Impressed now? Honestly, after looking at the screens of Flight, then looking at FSX, I want to throw up because of how bad FSX looks. :biggrin:And remember, the FSX engine is fine. It just has a lot of bugs. Remove the bugs, add good performance, a big graphical improvement like we have mostly seen with Flight, and you have a winner.

LOL I've been telling you that since the beginning..... hey! it's never to late to prove me right......:( :( I'm just playing with you....