Chris, tks for the list. I wonder why they havent mentioned the SP on their general forum.

Because it's for folks who have the plane... It isn't listed on the Flight1 sales page yet - I expect it will be soon.DJ

what are the new features in the style menu. can the standby displays be changed to electronic versions on the non BBJs yet, and can Airstairs be added to Non BBJs yet?

Because it's for folks who have the plane... It isn't listed on the Flight1 sales page yet - I expect it will be soon.DJ

Yes, but there also a lot who bought the plane and returned it, waiting for the SP. Seems kinda 'offputting' they are not considering those people.

Yes, but there also a lot who bought the plane and returned it, waiting for the SP. Seems kinda 'offputting' they are not considering those people.

HelloWhy should they consider those who bought the plane then rejected it.Its easy, to get the SP1 just repurchase the product.I cannot see what you find offputting about that.

HelloWhy should they consider those who bought the plane then rejected it.Its easy, to get the SP1 just repurchase the product.I cannot see what you find offputting about that.

They 'rejected' it due to problems, and were/are waiting for news about the SP, to possibly re-purchase it. I was not advocating making it available, but at least a notice that it was released would be good marketing sense, unless they simply don't care about those particular customers.

They 'rejected' it due to problems, and were/are waiting for news about the SP, to possibly re-purchase it. I was not advocating making it available, but at least a notice that it was released would be good marketing sense, unless they simply don't care about those particular customers.

HelloNothing new here, the FSX version was available for purchase though the forum for existing FS9 users well before it showed up on the Flight1 site.Letting folk return the product for a refund is more than any other publisher would do, any obligations end there once Flight1 issue the refund.Seriously some folk will complain no matter how good the support is.Loyal customers get first go at the SP1, seems fair to me

Yes, but there also a lot who bought the plane and returned it, waiting for the SP. Seems kinda 'offputting' they are not considering those people.

All you have to do to get it is to buy the current version and register...DJ

HelloLoyal customers get first go at the SP1, seems fair to me

As it should be :-)

All you have to do to get it is to buy the current version and register...DJ

Well, if a company would not want to publish the changelog for their service pack I would be very, very skeptical of buying anything from them. A changelog should be publicly available to potential buyers, especially when the product is published by a company that has a money-back guarantee.

Well, if a company would not want to publish the changelog for their service pack I would be very, very skeptical of buying anything from them. A changelog should be publicly available to potential buyers, UNLESS the product is published by a company that has a money-back guarantee.

Fixed that for you.

Well, if a company would not want to publish the changelog for their service pack I would be very, very skeptical of buying anything from them. A changelog should be publicly available to potential buyers, especially when the product is published by a company that has a money-back guarantee.

HelloYou would be very very sceptical of buying from a company with a money back guarantee ?I really don't understand what people want from a developer these days.Anyone reading this forum will have noticed the amount of praise given to the support behind this product.They will also know about the 30 day money back guarantee.They will also know it is the best 737NG currently available for purchase.What is there to be sceptical about with that ?When the SP1 is rolled into the downloadable product then no doubt Flight1 will have the list of changes on the product page.It seems that some folk will find a way to be unhappy no matter what.

Althought I am not surprised, did I just read a post or two complaining that we are providing support for a product?Plain and simple... If you are registered member of the product, you will have access to registered support items such as service packs, information, previews, etc. The choice of making these available to the public is up to the developer/publisher. If you have a legitimate copy of the software and are registered in our forum area, you have full access to the information and files at hand.

Well, if a company would not want to publish the changelog for their service pack I would be very, very skeptical of buying anything from them. A changelog should be publicly available to potential buyers, especially when the product is published by a company that has a money-back guarantee.

I wouldn't be too sceptical - this company are far and away more forthcoming with support, information etc than any (any I mean any) other developers - including the BIG names. In fact, some of the big names could learn from them.DP

I wouldn't be too sceptical - this company are far and away more forthcoming with support, information etc than any (any I mean any) other developers - including the BIG names. In fact, some of the big names could learn from them.DP

Yes, I know that, I'm just commenting on a general basis. I would think that a company that doesnt want to release the changelog for a patch probably have something to hide for whatever reason, hence my skeptisism

Quick check: VC in Gatwick, 18->20fps improvement and mouse off screen 23->25fps improvement. Better than nothing.