Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest

Excessive VAS usage in P3D V3.4 triggered by OPTIMIZE_PARTS

Recommended Posts

I'll try to run the test tomorrow and have some numbers to add.


CASE: Louqe S1 MKIII CPU: AMD R5 7600X RAM: 32GB DDR5 5600 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS DX11 · Windows 11

Share this post


Link to post
Guest

Thanks again everyone for all the input.

 

Cheers, Rob.

Share this post


Link to post

Here my findings at stand 5 at ESSA in the NGX following the steps outlined in post #18.

 

1405952 with OP set to 1 (FPS 55)

1426304 with OP set to 0 (FPS 47)

 

As you can see an improvement looking at VAS but not by much where the FPS instead dropped by a more significant amount of 8 FPS.

 

One thing I was thinking. Could the change in VAS behavior looking at 3.3 vs 3.4 has anything to do with the technique P3D used to release VAS memory during a flight?

 

Reason I came to think of this is I don't really see that much of a difference in VAS when just checking a specific situation like this one standing at a gate after starting P3D. The difference I've seen seems to be more after doing some flying where P3D both loaded the scenery at my origin as well as loading different scenery and weather along the flight and then finally loading the scenery at my destination.

 

Would have been interesting to do this same comparison between 3.3 and 3.4 after doing a full flight in the same conditions.

Edited by WebMaximus

Richard Åsberg

Share this post


Link to post

Hope that there's a hotfix coming out for this problem.


Angus Rowlands: i7 8700 RTX Asus Strix 2080, 16 GB RAM

Share this post


Link to post

What problem? So far we seem to see a trade for a relatively small amount of VAS for a significant performance improvement. That doesn't strike me as unreasonable.

  • Upvote 2

13900K@5.8GHz - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR  HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)

Share this post


Link to post

Optimize part=0 : Flytampa EKCH VAS= 1541804 FPS= 47 Aircraft PMDG 737-700
Optimize part=1 : Flytampa EKCH VAS= 1529040 FPS= 57 Aircraft PMDG 737-700


 

André
 

Share this post


Link to post

Optimize part=0 : Flytampa EKCH VAS= 1541804 FPS= 47 Aircraft PMDG 737-700

Optimize part=1 : Flytampa EKCH VAS= 1529040 FPS= 57 Aircraft PMDG 737-700

 

Very similar to my findings both looking at VAS and FPS.


Richard Åsberg

Share this post


Link to post

The tradeoff between FPS and VAS for me is leaning towards leaving OP=1 on. The sim takes a big performance hit without it. FSUIPC will at least allow me to pick up where I left off in case of an OOM. 


Let me guess.... you want 64bit. 

Josh Daniels-Johannson

Share this post


Link to post

Ditto ;-)


Best regards,
David Roch

AMD Ryzen 5950X //  Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME //  32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR4 4000 MHz CL17 //  ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC Edition //  2x SSD 1Tb Corsair MP600 PCI-E4 NVM //  Corsair 1600W PSU & Samsung Odyssey Arc 55" curved monitor
Thrustmaster Controllers: TCA Yoke Pack Boeing Edition + TCA Captain Pack Airbus Edition + Pendular Rudder.

 

Share this post


Link to post

This entire discussion shows that no matter what they say, in the end it comes down to the simple fact, that with current add-ons on the market and used in combination with each other, the only definite solution is to develop a 64-bit Platform.

As much as P3D has improved with releasing VAS, something FSX never did, it is still vulnerable to the memory overload.

 

I really look forward to a time, when VAS discussions will no longer happen.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post

This entire discussion shows that no matter what they say, in the end it comes down to the simple fact, that with current add-ons on the market and used in combination with each other, the only definite solution is to develop a 64-bit Platform.

As much as P3D has improved with releasing VAS, something FSX never did, it is still vulnerable to the memory overload.

 

I really look forward to a time, when VAS discussions will no longer happen.

I am with you Karsten (btw. cool Name ) But i promise you the next discussion flood after having 64bit platform with "what scenery is 64bit compatible and what tweaking can be done to make it compatible"

 

Not sure if that will be less painful discussion.

 

Cheers, Carsten

  • Upvote 1

Carsten U

Share this post


Link to post

i ve just started a flight between nantes LFRS and athenes LGAV with pmdg 737, with a was @ 1250mb, now and after 20minutes of flight vas is @951 mb

 

optimize part =0, shader are rebuild


Frédéric Giraud

Share this post


Link to post

i ve just started a flight between nantes LFRS and athenes LGAV with pmdg 737, with a was @ 1250mb, now and after 20minutes of flight vas is @951 mb

optimize part =0, shader are rebuild

And what was vas usage with optimize parts=1 at that stage of the flight ?


Carsten U

Share this post


Link to post

since version 3.4 is out, the max time spend to fly is 1H45, and when i land vas show 700mb with OP=1

 

i am actually above the sea to athenes 2H15 flight, and vas is 989mb always with OP=0


Frédéric Giraud

Share this post


Link to post

Does anyone happen to have a good saved flight plan they can link for download (something with gps autopilot path laid out for testing this) / and/or recommended aircraft to test?  That way each test can be exactly the same for the most part?

 

I assume most are using fsuipc with 024C and Type =32 sent to title window or console window perhaps (or log file)?


MSI z690-a Unify; 1000 watt evga SuperNova Platinum; 12900kf at 1.255 adaptive LLC6, auto avx, auto Pcore, E-4.0ghz, Ring-4.1ghz, PL 241watt (Cine96c, games 83c case side On); DDR5 Gskill F5-6400J3239G16GA2-TZ5RS  at 6400mhz autovolt, Kraken x73 360mm; Thermaltake v51 Case; Gigabyte 4090 OC;  VR-Varjo Aero;  AstronomicallySpeaking:

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...