5 hours ago, 54u14m said:

AIG+PSXseeconTraffic+ADS-B Live Traffic

Ditto. 

20 hours ago, goodperson36 said:

Really quick wanting to buy AI Traffic packaged which one is better Flight1 Traffic live or justflight global traffic Thanks

How accurate on a rating of 1 to 5 do you want your traffic to be? 

AIGM-OCI free, great traffic, great developers.. PBR models.. And the developers now belong to P3D Beta group.. Meaning they will always stay ahead of the game vs any other AI tool..

😉

31 minutes ago, Rob_Ainscough said:

UTLive 2 ... no fuss, no mess ... install and go fly

Cheers, Rob.

EDIT: No PBR aircraft (which make a huge difference visually in P3D v4.x v5.x) out of the box but you should be able to use those provide for free (above per Raul).  Also no GA flights right now and will have to wait for UTL2 update.

With old schedules and airlines that don't exist anymore.   Pure eye candy, if that's what you want 

26 minutes ago, fluffyflops said:

With old schedules and airlines that don't exist anymore.

UTL v2 schedules are from mid 2019, so are as up to date as you'll be seeing as most devs aren't going to do Covid airline traffic (or lack thereof). UTL does however, need a lot of work from the user to reassign repaints to really make it shine.

8 hours ago, julietsierrappl said:

Do ATC programs likce p2atc or vox and others talk to and instruct other planes in ai packages or do they only know about you?

I´am using PF3 for ATC and it interacts very well with the AI-Traffis by UTL. You have nice ATC chatter with the correct names. (A Lufthansa AI plane comunicate as Lufthansa2224 i. ex.) I cna´t say about the others you counted.

ooops, sorry.....🤭

9 hours ago, julietsierrappl said:

Do ATC programs likce p2atc or vox and others talk to and instruct other planes in ai packages or do they only know about you?

p2atc has no AI comms & one uses the sim's traffic engine or others (eg UTL) to depict AI with no interface to one's aircraft.

VoxATC not only has AI comms matching the depicted but has its own traffic engine (using data compiled from bgl's .... AIFP, AIG, etc) to spawn & control that AI including interface with one's aircraft ....... airliners or GA. Vox does not work with UTL.

Edited November 8, 20205 yr by vadriver

9 hours ago, julietsierrappl said:

Do ATC programs likce p2atc or vox and others talk to and instruct other planes in ai packages or do they only know about you?

Radar Contact v4 does. In reality RC4 reacts to what the aircraft is doing rather than the other way. Each Ai has a status and it’s that which RC4 reads to issue the relevant instruction.

I am having great performance with UTLive2 Beta.  I am surprised that I am recommending it.  I have the entire airport loaded with default settings.  AIG is another one which is epic and free.  AIG usually will have the most accurate liveries. 

Best of all @simbol awesome FSReborn AI Pro works with these AI.  The lights are amazing!!!!

Edited November 8, 20205 yr by Skywolf

14 hours ago, BerndB said:

 Because the Traffic isn´t bgl-based it impresses me with it´s performance. If i´am at EDDF, or other highdense airports i can have all Gates full of Ai and even have trafficjam at the to-runway, without any noticable performance lack. 

Does this impact the ability of FSUIPC to limit AI?

 Injected vs BGL traffic has minimal gains at the most. I've measured over the years at various airports using clear skies/no weather and saved scenarios and never saw more than 2 fps if any at all and I think it more has to do with the how close as in varied LOD the particular AI were in relation to my traffic bubble at the time. Sometimes BGL traffic has better fps and sometimes injected traffic was better. 

 What it far more comes down to when people say that UTL has better fps over AIG is 100% due to the amount of traffic each display. For instance, I just loaded up at KCVG, and for testing I have both UTL and AIG traffic running at 100%. I also have assigned MANY of the UTL aircraft to use the AIG aircraft so I am getting much more traffic from UTL than from a vanilla install. At this particular time of day, UTL is injecting 42 aircraft into the sim where I am, whereas AIG is adding 148. So sure, UTL is going to be less of a burden on the system.

Edited November 9, 20205 yr by Dave_YVR

My experience with UTL

8 hours ago, Skywolf said:

Best of all @simbol awesome FSReborn AI Pro works with these AI.  The lights are amazing!!!!

...and so they do with UTL

2 hours ago, Dave_YVR said:

 What it far more comes down to when people say that UTL has better fps over AIG is 100% due to the amount of traffic each display. For instance, I just loaded up at KCVG, and for testing I have both UTL and AIG traffic running at 100%. I also have assigned MANY of the UTL aircraft to use the AIG aircraft so I am getting much more traffic from UTL than from a vanilla install. At this particular time of day, UTL is injecting 42 aircraft into the sim where I am, whereas AIG is adding 148. So sure, UTL is going to be less of a burden on the system.

For UTL it also depends on how many "repaints" you have added. In addition to models that come with UTL i have assigned all the AI´s from the FLAI package. I´ve turned the trafficdensitiy to 100 % and switched off the FPS control of UTL. The issue then was, that i hardly could find a free Gate when arriving at an airport. EDDH, EDDF, EDDM, all gates where busy. Though i have turned down the density to 85-90 %. Now i can find one or two free positions out of 10. 

UTL2 Beta is really nice and easy to use. Avoid Traffic Global, it has hardly any traffic on most airports except for the large ones and in the UK. It also appears to be still an early access version. They published the full release a month or so ago, but the file I can download from JustFlight is still named early access.

Peter