simbol

Takeoff distance of 3,209 feet (978 meters) and a landing distance of 2,220 feet (677 meters), this is on ISA Conditions...

I never promise dates, never will.. I promise quality.. that I can put on the line. Best, R.

The music was composed specifically for me by NEPTUNAL AUDIO DESIGN in Sweden, alongside with many other tracks that will be used later to continue showcasing each individual parts of the deep simulation and systems of the product. They starting creating the music since June 2025, all accordingly to how I asked to be done and be designed for everything I need. You will not find this song anywhere else online, is exclusive to FSReborn, and we hold the unique rights to use it, we will also publish it to Spotify once we release the aircraft so people can enjoy all the tracks we designing. The lady voice you hear in the trailer is a real voice over actress, her name is Heather, and we worked together also to bring the experience for this "Teaser" trailer, and the objective of this video, was to: 1) Give the public an overview of "progress" of the project using a different format than posting just pictures in clay, or with fancy shoots with effects, etc. You saw it now flying and having all lighting effects in place, textures, views, etc. and a simulated Electrical Failure. This can be achieved via "Cinematic shots", is a small video, not a full Review or Tutorial where you would have up to 20 minutes to talk to people telling them everything about the aircraft. 2) To challenge the users and set the tone of my plans, because let's face it, you all got used now to "Boring" executive jets, they just fly A to B, they do nothing else than following a magenta line.. you buy these products and after a week, you are bored of them.. don you? if anybody owns my previous release (FSR500) after seeing that trailer and listening to what Heather says, they would pick up the message.. You cannot showcase sounds in a teaser trailer and also try to show the visuals, there is not enough time, the attention spam of viewers for videos is in average 30 to 45 seconds, doing a video to showcase just the sounds to introduce a product, requires much more time and people already been interested in the product in the 1st place. At Dublin, I did a presentation of about 25 minutes to each group and I performed around 7 to 8 presentations that day, even so, I could only show case around 30% of the features that comes with this product. So to showcase publicly all the systems, is a big challenge, and this will be the mission of Streamers, Reviewers, etc. therefore that will come later, if you curios, we recorded the sounds from the real aircraft, I had to pay the premium hours like I was someone renting the plane to fly it out.. and Echo19 took the recording and implemented the sounds with me and my testers and we continuing to provide feedback. I understand the market is quite saturated, and people are "Jaded" with the constants releases of products full of problems, developers ignoring them, things that do not work and developers that lack interaction with the community. However I think I been doing the opposite for many years now, I love attention to details, including any "Music" I want to use, I wouldn't use Royalty Free music for a teaser trailer where I want to captivate the amount of work and details we putting into the product, it has been 3 years in development so far, hours and hours of work. I hope you guys enjoyed the progress update, I am planning to do a follow up stream with TwoToneMurphy this week, join my discord server or his to follow up so you all can ask question you might have, after this, I will go back to my cave, and you might not hear anything else, until we ready to release. Best, Raul

For the ones that were at my presentation in Dublin, thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to show case this to you close and personal, it was an honour to have you with me and I hope I made your day a bit special. For the rest expressing here your support, thank you so much, hearing your feedback and excitement is really great and rewarding. I posted more teasers on my discord server, wanted to upload pictures here, but i am unable now that imgur have been banned in the UK, Avsim will need to update the way we share pictures now, since this is going to be quite difficult for some EU countries. In any case, I just got home, tomorrow code resumes, back to grind, this aircraft is very special in my heart, if you own any of my aircrafts, you should know what to expect, in hence the tease on the video.. do you think you can fly a private jet? Maybe, but this will be a FSReborn one! You better follow QRH, POH, Aircraft Operations Manual, and maintain your aircraft accordingly.. otherwise, it might punish you.. Enough of boring Jets in the market! Welcome to the FSReborn experience. Best, Raul

Yes, I know about the standby.. I faced some difficulties with this: A) MSFS 2020 did not have any documentation in avionics framework at the time of development, remember this started back in 2021, not now or few months back. So back then it was very hard to make avionics for MSFS, at the same time, the G1000 from WT was just coming out, also not supporting plugins or anything like these days.. this forced me to FORK the G1000 unit to implement the EIS and code everything manually (there was not even documentation of how to use NODE.JS or React for this!). When I started FSR500, the standby instrument was actually an Aspen unit, I started developing this and found how difficult doing avionics is for MSFS without proper documentation and framework in place was, I had to abandon it due two how 1st, how difficult it would be to do the full aspen unit, then I found memory issues (see B) and then Piper abandon the use of the Aspen unit in favour of the GI-275. It is important to explain that to write a full Aspen unit or GI-275 from scratch, would have taken me years.. something I could not afford for a GA Project, as opposed to what most people think, GA Aircraft projects don't sell in massive numbers, like airliners do, the number of copies we sell from small aircrafts are quite low in relation to something like an 737, etc. It is the reason you see most of GA 3rd party Aircraft developers being a team of 1 person, we cannot just afford to have 3 to 5 developers in a GA Project as it means, nobody will be able to have a reasonable profit at all. You will notice also, GA aircraft developers that are conformed by larger teams, became 1st party devs instead.. this is probably what helps then to grow. So B) MSFS 2020 memory management by the time of release (SU8) was pretty bad, and when memory runs out, all the avionics go BLACK, this is called ABOs( Avionics Black Outs) Due to MSFS Shutting down all the HTML / JS Gauges in order to free memory and avoid a CTD. This meant, if I put yet another instrument to this aircraft (PFD, MFD, PFD, EFB and Standby) The ram will starve faster, causing all avionics to cease to function, including the EFB. For this reason, I decided to put it on hold, and release 1st focusing since we has deep system simulations which compensate, in my view (right or wrong) the standby instrument is there just for really emergencies and since you had 2xPFD + 1 MFD the trade off for all the problems describe above was not justifiable at that time. Now with MSFS 2024 and MSFS 2020 new GDU updates and new MSFS Framework for avionics, things are different, but this is now almost 4 years later since the technology has moved on, quite frankly, I suspect Microsoft is developing more instruments and a WT GI-275 avionic might come soon into the space, so I am waiting instead of wasting resources, and as soon as it is available, then I will push the update and implement it, most likely with the schedule FREE upgrade to MSFS 2024 native after phenom 300E is released. We developers face challenges with technology sometimes, and we have to take decisions to make the project successful and move forward, You start doing an aircraft and as time moves forward, your entire space changes, SU1, SU2, SU3, SUx, etc. gets released and you have to re-write the code many times while providing support also for other things you released, so bottom line, sometimes we have to draw a line and set a limit to what has to be developed in order to push out a product out of the front door. I would suggest to some of you to apply to be beta testers for some 3rd party devs, it would give you all an insight of what goes behind the scenes, it will change the way you review products, in both ways, as you will be more demanding with your reviews but also, more understanding in regards to what limitations exist within each flight simulation platform. I thank you for posting your feedback in a positive manner and for supporting my products these years. Best, Raul

I used the piper layout configurator back in 2021 when I started the aircraft development (the layout still exist today in 2025), the interior on this aircraft comes with multiple choices of glare shields, all of them looking clean, modern and sleek, I decided to use the Geneva layout because I liked it: So is not a missed detail that the glare shield should be black, is just a choice I made. There are plenty of MODs in flightsim.to where you can change it to black and other creative options texture artists came with.. m500 - Explore - Flightsim.to And yes, perhaps I missed your point entirely because the way you phrased things, is not what people say, it is how people say it sometimes, calling someone project basement like budget and a developer egocentric is not perhaps the best way to start an interaction to convey feedback. This is one of the reasons most 3rd party developers are starting to cut off their public relationships with customers and their interactions, a lot of users tent to forget we are humans like they are, and just fail to express their feedback in a positive manner where both parties can exchange ideas and reach understandings regarding products development, limitations and many other subjects, instead everything leads to a Mexican stand off because we are all failing to communicate effectively. I hope one day you meet me in person and I can change your view that I am egocentric, I must admit, that comment really hurt me. Best of day to you, Raul

It is how the real aircraft is inside.. I understand if it is not apealing for you, everyone has different taste, etc. but honeslty, we did it exaclty as the airplane is, this shots are from real M500: I think most people are expecting to see and old and weared aircraft, but in reality the M Class are very new type of aircrafts, and they keep themselves very well since is not an aircraft that would be used for Passengers transportation (like PC-12, otters, etc), is more like an aircraft you keep as a owner and as such, you would treat it very well. The M500 should not to be confused with the old Meridians class, where some of them were converted to a tuborprop version, those are pretty old, also have older avionics, etc. and would present more wear and tear. Thanks for the feedback. Raul

A M E N on the Dirty 30! and props on a lovely flight through The Loop! I’ve been letting that one bake thru Alpha, but I thought it was really good (as an Alpha) even right out of the gate. I have to check it out again soon. only thing I don’t like about it is how different the Lockheed cockpit flow is from everything else. But that’s a “me” problem 🤪 Only thing that would make me happier is if Raul dropped an FSR 700 Fury on us 😎 Edited August 2 by UrgentSiesta The Fury is too new to gather data at the moment, aircraft manufacturers don't really give you much data as opossed to what most people think. You need pilots of the type or flying schools that can provide you with meaningful information. So we have to let the aviation market mature a bit longer before being able to gather the data for the 700. R.

Well, do you know most 3rd party developers actually work from home, and yes some in basements? What's wrong with that? Now my office home is actually in the second floor, and I have 2 laptops, 3 PCs, 2 screens, several joysticks, throttles, mouses, keyboards, 1 Xbox-S and 1 Xbox-X. If making a turboprop with that equipment, the help of 2 Brazilian pilots that fly the real aircraft 3 times a week, 1 flying school of the type, get recording data directly from Garmin g1000 for systems data and simulations, charting a real M500 for 1 day to record the sounds and invest 18 moths of development on it is a basement budget, then great, it did the job. Is so easy to judge people, all I care is putting a smile to customers with the experience of my products, if 1 person does, job done. I don't need to lease a building with 3 floors to achieve that, instead I can use that money to build more products and better products for customers that appreciate the end results. Best, Raul

KEY STEP - ONLY USE "SEND TO ATC" in the EFB to send the plan to the plane in the main map - nothing else. Verify you see the blue line generate on the world map in the background. Then load the plane, fly now button. This worked for all of us.. under SU2. Best, Raul

Ok so we tested and managed to get any flight plan as long as they are way point to way point, because by design the G3X only accept flight plans like that without an external navigator. Once we loaded a livery with a GTN (a navigator) the G3X is capable of doing IFR rules and loaded fine any flight plan that had routes, so as far we can test, everything was working as per G3X design. This was tested by couple of testers and a customer in our discord channel, all of us in SU2. If you have the TDS, you need a mod from us, and you can use the TDS and your G3X will behave much more professional, so totally worth doing. Best, Raul

Lol for that we have to do a full 2024 project m8. 1st I will release Phenom 300E.

Something changed recently, probably an update via back end servers in 2024 and we never got a changelog. Looking to see how to fix it from my side, you know my support is the best, once I get the fix I will push it, give me some time please as I need to push to MSFS 2020 MP, test, confirm, publish and then asobo ports it to MSFS 2024 in the back end. Last round of updates took 4 working days.. but I also need some time to find the cause, fix it and publish. R.

Thank you I will attempt to do this

Cheers I will do so when I get home on Sunday. R.