January 13, 20215 yr 15 minutes ago, jpe828 said: Based on his own comments in his forum, they airplane is a write off... going to scrap. Not worth the repairs! That is said, there must be more damage than it appears Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
January 13, 20215 yr https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/246396 that's the accident. Karl i9-9900K@5,0 | 32GB 3200 | 2080TI | 4K 55" | MSFS | P3D V5
January 13, 20215 yr 13 minutes ago, leprechaunlive said: possibily a stupid question, but would you need to replace the engines even if the prop struck when the engines was off? There is no such thing as stupid questions ! The reason is why engine get compromised after prop strike is damage done to crankshaft. It's very hard to re-certified even after through repair. The airplane that I own had prop strike accident (many years before I purchased it) as a result engine that had been replaced . And the one I currently have is two years older than airplane according logs ! Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
January 13, 20215 yr That's a shame, but I am really glad they were able to walk away from the accident.
January 13, 20215 yr A gear up landing always is prop strike, isn't it? Karl i9-9900K@5,0 | 32GB 3200 | 2080TI | 4K 55" | MSFS | P3D V5
January 13, 20215 yr 29 minutes ago, kaha said: A gear up landing always is prop strike, isn't it? Karl Maybe not for a few planes like a AC50 twin commander. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
January 13, 20215 yr 13 hours ago, orchestra_nl said: So we simmers in general are not that bad, it's probably just thís forum😉 Well, it's just this (MSFS forum) where you get that. Not AVSIM in general. FYI, see below: Rhett 7800X3D ♣ 96 GB G.Skill Flare ♣ Gigabyte 4090 ♣ Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
January 14, 20215 yr Think it will be one their existing aircraft. I'm hoping for either the 182, Texan or Cherokee 180 to be the first out the door. If its a new model my hope is for a Spitfire MK IX.
January 14, 20215 yr Any warbird. Especially the Zero (unlikely for A2A to do another Zero, they did one for FS9 and it also worked in FSX). The Zero could out turn any other fighter down below 4000 feet or so. And was very stable and easy to fly and land. Which would make it perfect one seatter GA modern high speed plane, except that it had a 1500 Horsepower engine and guzzled gas. Which is not a big disadvantage in a flightsim. It's maneuverability and stability was out of this world. The Warhawk looked more cool (my avatar). 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
January 14, 20215 yr Author 1 hour ago, Naki18 said: Think it will be one their existing aircraft. I'm hoping for either the 182, Texan or Cherokee 180 to be the first out the door. If its a new model my hope is for a Spitfire MK IX. I think so too... and there is no Warbird yet for the sim. So they may want to steal first on that one.... I would love the Bo or Comanche but I doubt it. Never tried the T6 or the Cherokee... I would be happy with anything, but happier on the GA side.
January 14, 20215 yr Author Little update snippet from Scott today on the sim version.... I wonder if we might see something from A2A in the not too distant future! "Many will be shocked what they learn when they fly this plane, as these lessons are applicable to any high performance twin. So there is zero chance we will not be making the A2A Aerostar. It's very far along. I suppose a cool way to look at this is, A2A's job is to make N122PC live forever through Accu-Sim. It's even more important now, especially since these straight 600's are getting so rare."
January 14, 20215 yr Commercial Member 4 hours ago, Fielder said: Any warbird. Especially the Zero (unlikely for A2A to do another Zero, they did one for FS9 and it also worked in FSX). The Zero could out turn any other fighter down below 4000 feet or so. And was very stable and easy to fly and land. Which would make it perfect one seatter GA modern high speed plane, except that it had a 1500 Horsepower engine and guzzled gas. Which is not a big disadvantage in a flightsim. It's maneuverability and stability was out of this world. The Warhawk looked more cool (my avatar). Stay tuned today my friend 🙂
January 14, 20215 yr Author 42 minutes ago, leprechaunlive said: Stay tuned today my friend 🙂 You can't just drop that and leave!!
January 14, 20215 yr Commercial Member 1 hour ago, jpe828 said: You can't just drop that and leave!! Actually i can, and its even worst than that. 😄 5 minutes after that comment and maybe an hour from posting an official announcement, we got words than a dev is working on the same aircraft as us, so we'll have to stay in secrecy a while longer 😄 sooooorry 😛
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.