And I can't believe it these guys get hate from the other sources like you would not believe it. They need to Prove themselves soon or because no one outside of their Alpha team or the dev's believe a word they say.

33 minutes ago, jbdbow1970 said:

And I can't believe it these guys get hate from the other sources like you would not believe it. They need to Prove themselves soon or because no one outside of their Alpha team or the dev's believe a word they say.

I hope they do as they seem fit and dont care what other sources, who are just scared they lose sales, say.

 

7 hours ago, Ixoye said:

I have never seen any aircraft with this level of complexity, are this the new high-end standard, beyond PMDG?

Lot of people speak highly of the ToLiss Airbuses on XP. V1 (Youtuber) said that the FSLabs is currently doing the most complete job of simulating an Airbus. When he was reviewing the Fenix it sounded like he expects this to be even one notch above.

8 hours ago, Chock said:

They never work either.

Actually it would be even more authentic if when it pulled on stand, a rampie plugged the FEP in, signalled the cockpit by thumping the underside of the fuselage then running out twenty feet to the side and giving the plug in signal, then the co-pilot looks up at the overhead and gives a thumbs-down, then the process is repeated five or six times, with someone also running the the control box and swiping their ID badge on it several times to no avail until someone pulls on stand five minutes later with a GPU, then plugs that in instead when they realise that the FEP is broken. Then that plug also falls out, hits some rampie on the head and then a load of swearing is heard before the crew decide to give up and use the APU instead, but because the FEP was technically still running because nobody turned it off, the airline still gets charged ninety quid for using it. They could call it their Authentic GSE Mode.

Been there, done that, have multiple t-shirts.

I wonder how long until we get a release date…I need to give them my money asap 

It's good to see new 3pd airliner makers entering the market. Even if this plane turns out as just "ok" its good to see. 

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that the developer behind this aircraft is the same person that developed the FlightFactor A320U for X-Plane 11. Back then, also alot of grand things were promised and it was claimed by him and FlightFactor that it would be better than the FSLabs A320 and all kinds of promises were made. In the end it was so nowhere near as advanced as the FSLabs A320 and development came to a halt as soon as the wave of initial sales after its release was over. Now years later, angry customers are left with an unfinished product and missing features that were promised by the developer. so please don't just believe everything that is claimed, don't buy when this comes out but wait to see if it really lives up to all the promises that are being made.

 

It would be my plane for my training. Btw great video!

1 hour ago, dmitryc said:

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that the developer behind this aircraft is the same person that developed the FlightFactor A320U for X-Plane 11. Back then, also alot of grand things were promised and it was claimed by him and FlightFactor that it would be better than the FSLabs A320 and all kinds of promises were made. In the end it was so nowhere near as advanced as the FSLabs A320 and development came to a halt as soon as the wave of initial sales after its release was over. Now years later, angry customers are left with an unfinished product and missing features that were promised by the developer. so please don't just believe everything that is claimed, don't buy when this comes out but wait to see if it really lives up to all the promises that are being made.

 

Where is this reliable source?

Give reference please?

I purchased FF A320U while it was still in beta.

I would say the Fenix A320 at the Alpha stage is already more feature-completed than the current FF A320U.

FF A320 didn't even model the alternative law nor direct law back when it was released as beta.

 

1 hour ago, dmitryc said:

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that the developer behind this aircraft is the same person that developed the FlightFactor A320U for X-Plane 11. Back then, also alot of grand things were promised and it was claimed by him and FlightFactor that it would be better than the FSLabs A320 and all kinds of promises were made. In the end it was so nowhere near as advanced as the FSLabs A320 and development came to a halt as soon as the wave of initial sales after its release was over. Now years later, angry customers are left with an unfinished product and missing features that were promised by the developer. so please don't just believe everything that is claimed, don't buy when this comes out but wait to see if it really lives up to all the promises that are being made.

 

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

1 hour ago, dmitryc said:

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that the developer behind this aircraft is the same person that developed the FlightFactor A320U for X-Plane 11. Back then, also alot of grand things were promised and it was claimed by him and FlightFactor that it would be better than the FSLabs A320 and all kinds of promises were made. In the end it was so nowhere near as advanced as the FSLabs A320 and development came to a halt as soon as the wave of initial sales after its release was over. Now years later, angry customers are left with an unfinished product and missing features that were promised by the developer. so please don't just believe everything that is claimed, don't buy when this comes out but wait to see if it really lives up to all the promises that are being made.

 

Okay... in your first post at avsim you think I´m going to believe in your "reliable source"?

It seems more concern of competitors for the high level that is being presented by Fenix.

Edited July 26, 20214 yr by leonbr

1 hour ago, leonbr said:

Okay... in your first post at avsim you think I´m going to believe in your "reliable source"?

 

Yeah red flags waiving when someone makes an account just to smear another addon developer.

7 hours ago, dmitryc said:

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that the developer behind this aircraft is the same person that developed the FlightFactor A320U for X-Plane 11. Back then, also alot of grand things were promised and it was claimed by him and FlightFactor that it would be better than the FSLabs A320 and all kinds of promises were made. In the end it was so nowhere near as advanced as the FSLabs A320 and development came to a halt as soon as the wave of initial sales after its release was over. Now years later, angry customers are left with an unfinished product and missing features that were promised by the developer. so please don't just believe everything that is claimed, don't buy when this comes out but wait to see if it really lives up to all the promises that are being made.

 

Hi.

I own the company. You're welcome to have a look at our companies house information (all company information in the United Kingdom is public and free to view, we're registered as FenixSim Ltd.) - and I've never had anything to do with FlightFactor, unequivocally. 

The fact this is your one, and only, post on AVSIM leads me to believe we've done a decent job with our marketing and some of our competitors are perhaps a little worried 😉

Have a lovely evening!

8 hours ago, dmitryc said:

privet,

just a word of caution. I know from reliable source that

 

This wording is similar to the email that Austin Meyer published suggesting MS / Asobo were copying XPlane’s BET.

Not that I want to plant any seeds of suspicion in anyone’s mind or anything…