Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
flySWISS

GSX Pro - Top or Flop?

Recommended Posts

See my post here:

 

  • Like 1

Cheers, Søren Dissing

CPU: Intel i9-13900K @5.6-5.8 Ghz | Cooler: ASUS ROG RYUJIN III | GPU: ASUS Strix RTX4090 OC | MoBo: ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Hero | RAM: 64Gb DDR5 @5600 | SSDs: 1Tb Samsung M.2 980 PRO (Win11), 1Tb Samsung M.2 980 PRO (MSFS), | Case: ASUS ROG Helios 601 | Monitors: HP Reverb G2, 28" ASUS PB287Q 4K | Additional Hardware: TM TCA Captain's Edition, Tobii 5 | OS: Win 11 Pro 64 | Sim: MSFS | BA Virtual | PSXT, RealTraffic w/ AIG models

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jarmstro said:

It could well be that the CTDs have nothing whatsoever to do with GSX I just don't know. But it would be a very strange coincidence that on Friday with GSX installed I was getting frequent random CTDs, yesterday without it I had no problems whatsoever and today, having reinstalled it I was back to square one with a very annoying CTD.

Your CTDs could well be caused by GSX, but I do see a long thread on the MSFS forums where users are suddenly getting CTDs who never had them before, and many of those affected are on SU9 - not SU10 beta. It seemed to start around Aug 14th-15th.

New CTDs in the beta are one thing, but since SU9 has not been updated for weeks, I would assume this is caused by some kind of corruption in an incoming data stream - scenery or live weather or live traffic etc. A common characteristic of this particular CTD for many appears to be related to NTDLL with an error code 0xc0000374. Something to look for in the event viewer if you have a crash with GSX

  • Like 1

Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, JRBarrett said:

Your CTDs could well be caused by GSX, but I do see a long thread on the MSFS forums where users are suddenly getting CTDs who never had them before, and many of those affected are on SU9 - not SU10 beta. It seemed to start around Aug 14th-15th.

New CTDs in the beta are one thing, but since SU9 has not been updated for weeks, I would assume this is caused by some kind of corruption in an incoming data stream - scenery or live weather or live traffic etc. A common characteristic of this particular CTD for many appears to be related to NTDLL with an error code 0xc0000374. Something to look for in the event viewer if you have a crash with GSX

Yes I've also noted this. I really hope that it's actually not GSX and that an unfortunate coincidence has occurred. Time will tell. At present I, once again, have been crash free having uninstalled GSX.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, JRBarrett said:

Your CTDs could well be caused by GSX, but I do see a long thread on the MSFS forums where users are suddenly getting CTDs who never had them before, and many of those affected are on SU9 - not SU10 beta. It seemed to start around Aug 14th-15th.

Yep, add me to that list, and it was happening before GSX came out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a CTD having uninstalled GSX. I'm now thinking there is something amiss and the fact that GSX has just been released is a coincidence.

Edited by jarmstro
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, eslader said:

Yep, add me to that list, and it was happening before GSX came out. 

It is probably very unfortunate timing that GSX was released just when this new CTD problem arose in MSFS affecting many users in both SU10 beta and original SU9. It makes it difficult to separate CTDs caused specifically by GSX from CTDs that are unrelated.

If a CTD throws an error code of 0xc0000374 and referencing NTDLL, it is probably not GSX that caused it.

 

Edited by JRBarrett
  • Like 3

Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

part  2 of the  utube of the op post

 

  • Like 1

I7-800k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,    2  ssd 500gb 970 drive, gtx 1080ti Card,  RM850 power supply

 

Peter kelberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not getting this either and mind you, I've used GSX for P3D for years and years so I am very familiar with the product's in's and out's. Which is the best alternate pushback out there now for MSFS?


Eric 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, B777ER said:

I'm not getting this either and mind you, I've used GSX for P3D for years and years so I am very familiar with the product's in's and out's. Which is the best alternate pushback out there now for MSFS?

There's none even getting close to what GSX offers. Toolbar pushback has severe memory issues for months and is not been updated for months (abandoned?). FS2Crews Pushback Express is okay-ish, you manually move a shiny arrow to where you want your pushback to go (you cannot see the end position though, so it can crash you into a wall in certain cases). It does not really work with anything else than the 737 and the A320 because it does not understand how long your aircraft is. It will push the CRJ or CJ4 into the terminal or grass or another aircraft. But FS2Crews PBE would be the best of the worst, if you really don't want to get GSX. I was using it before GSX and as said it worked okayish if you don't mind the problems.

Edited by Fiorentoni
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RALF9636 said:

These posts here saved me 30 € and probably hours of hassle. 

Reading on the FSDT website says a demo version is available for all their software. If I decide to try GSX I'd go that route first.

  • Like 1

-J

13700KF | RTX 4090 @ 4K | 32GB DDR5 | 2 x 1TB SSDs | 1TB M.2 NVMe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, B777ER said:

I'm not getting this either and mind you, I've used GSX for P3D for years and years so I am very familiar with the product's in's and out's. Which is the best alternate pushback out there now for MSFS?

FS2 Crew pushback was recently updated, and works great now. 

  • Like 1

 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800 FSLTL , TrackIR ,  Avliasoft EFB2  ,  ATC  by PF3  ,

A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS, ACTIVE Sky FS,  PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320, Milviz C 310

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic & thread is a good example of why we wanted MSFS to be a fully working sim instead of a platform for 3rd party developers.

My conclusion is that MSFS is just another FSX/P3D & XPlane.

What we wanted to avoid is now a reality because ASOBO chose to focus on enhancing the scenery instead of focusing on the important core sim features we've clamored for since the day the sim released.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

A pilot is always learning and I LOVE to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How unfortunate for GSX to release coincidentally at the exact moment MSFS SU9 users started to get a spat of CTD's. Lots of people who never bought GSX are getting CTD's. The other forums are full of complaints right now.

  • Upvote 2

Take-offs are optional, landings are mandatory.
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
To make a small fortune in aviation you must start with a large fortune.

There's nothing less important than the runway behind you and the altitude above you.
It's better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air, than in the air wishing you were on the ground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, DJJose said:

This topic & thread is a good example of why we wanted MSFS to be a fully working sim instead of a platform for 3rd party developers.

My conclusion is that MSFS is just another FSX/P3D & XPlane.

What we wanted to avoid is now a reality because ASOBO chose to focus on enhancing the scenery instead of focusing on the important core sim features we've clamored for since the day the sim released.

Yeah well it was unrealistic MSFS would bring everything people want from a flight sim out-of-the-box. Whoever thought this was pretty naive. It's logical (business-wise) that Asobo/MS go for the lowest common denominator in the most cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...