https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=655e5869bd234d5f1ac1f43d

load of garbage , someone was high on drugs

Edited November 23, 20232 yr by jason74

3 hours ago, jason74 said:

load of garbage , someone was high on drugs

I think this guy was higher!

hkgracingking

an hour ago

satellites are IMPOSSIBLE there have never been ONE PHOTO OF ONE EVER. it is impossible to have a vacuum next to our atmosphere and before you brainwashed sheep start SCREAMING GRAVITY (a fantasy even NEWTON didnt believe in) I want you to PROVE IN ANY SCENARIO that a vacuum can exist next to our atmosphere - not on a blackboard in a real life experiment

This is the forum where all the aliens and UFO craps goes right?

As ridiculous as this sounds....I think the medium is the message in this case. It sounds stupid because of where it's posted (and the comments around it).

There has been quite a bit of level-headed discussion of the original videos by VFX experts, Computer techs .....people familiar with satellite systems, and the terminals used to access them etc etc.

Oddly enough, the two videos have yet to be properly debunked IMO. And by properly, I mean beyond "This one frame of the video kind of looks like a pre-made VFX image from a game back in the day, so it must be faked". 

If you set aside the knee-jerk conclusion that it must be CGI, and actually look at the analysis (of the original videos) that has been done by folks who know what they're talking about (SME's in their respective fields), you end up with more questions than answers.

I'm not convinced it's real, but if it's CGI, it's really, really well done.

Too many little details, from the differential framerate in the mouse cursor matching the real Citrix terminals used to access satellite feeds, ID of the (relay) satellites involved from their positions at the time, proper (front and back) lighting on the clouds from the flash at the end of the video, the coordinates at the bottom of the video, the way the clouds move, the fact that the original video is actually stereoscopic, positive ID of the type of drone and sensors in the second video, the type and combination of IR / Thermal overlay used....the timing of the release of the original videos......it just goes on and on.

Perhaps a combination of real footage, with CGI added on top?  It's really weird, and there don't seem to be any explanations that make much sense (on either side of the fence)

 

DB

 

 

2nd video:

http://web.archive.org/web/20180928055014/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShapuD290K0

1st video:

http://web.archive.org/web/20170908100102/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLBfzrGGQY

 

 

26 minutes ago, Fielder said:

2nd video:

http://web.archive.org/web/20180928055014/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShapuD290K0

1st video:

http://web.archive.org/web/20170908100102/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLBfzrGGQY

 

 

The original post of the first video was a dual-view (stereoscopic), and the information at the bottom was easier to see (though partially cutoff)......coordinates around the Nicobar Islands and "NROL-22" which is an NRO satellite, that allegedly relayed the signal from whichever unit(s) recorded the video.

In any case....it makes sense that somebody (NGA...NRO...take your pick) is watching virtually every square inch of this planet 24/7. Remember, even before the incredibly capable Hubble Telescope was launched, the US military had multiple similarly-sized units in orbit looking down instead of up..... That was 33 years ago and they've been quite busy since.

DB

Two things here.

Frstly the fact there hasn’t been a definitive answer as to what happened to the aircraft after all this time or a crash site or debris field ever  discovered, would strongly suggest this isn’t a “ normal” air crash, there’s something else at play, whatever that may be.

Secondly, those pesky Foo Fighters that buzz around aircraft and take some strange interest in aviation are 100% real.

Wether the two things are related as suggested here ? Who knows

Here are the three things that are compelling here for me:

1. The silhouette of the aircraft in the infrared certainly is a 777.

2. The event in the infrared video where the plan disappears is a black flash, which I believe would indicate extreme cold not a hot explosion and its gone in a flash!

3. Nobody seems to be able to falsify the authenticity of the video.

I'd like to know what the odds of a fake video fooling forensic scrutiny are. I'm imagining very low.

My standard for determining is a video is fake is how impossible the content is.

i.e. I see it, but I don't believe it!🤣

whats next?

ET sank the Titanic ?

What a load of horse s#!7.

Some people need to pay for a partner for a few hours than video editing software

 

 

 

Since I live in the Middle of Middle Earth I know exactly where it is, about 35 miles South East of Hobbiton at the bottom of Green Lake 

5 hours ago, FBW737 said:

2. The event in the infrared video where the plan disappears is a black flash, which I believe would indicate extreme cold not a hot explosion and its gone in a flash!

I see only a white flash. Where do you see a black flash?

8 hours ago, jeansy said:

whats next?

ET sank the Titanic ?

I think you could be onto something here.

I suggest launching a website with largely irrelevant pictures and videos of the Queen Mary, icebergs, and an orchestra and start asking for donations. 

It seems to work for a lot of people.... 

9 hours ago, dmwalker said:

I see only a white flash. Where do you see a black flash?

I see it.

17 hours ago, jon b said:

Frstly the fact there hasn’t been a definitive answer as to what happened to the aircraft after all this time or a crash site or debris field ever  discovered

Not a debris “field” but debris from the aircraft were found over a year after the disappearance. They washed up on beaches in the western Indian Ocean. One item was the right wing flaperon that was positively identified as coming from MH 370 by the serial number of the part.

This would indicate that the aircraft broke up - either in flight, or upon impact with the ocean. It did not “vanish into the void” in a big flash.

Edited November 24, 20232 yr by JRBarrett